@GeorgeMonbiot Also, every ecosystem in the world and its biodiversity is primarily adapted to climate i.e. it's a major axis of that n-dimensional hypervolume. Meaning all species will become unadapted to the niche they currently occupy.
@GeorgeMonbiot As the climate shifts and every species becomes unadapted to the niche they currently occupy, some will be able to adapt to new niches, but many won't. Hence the mechanism by which many species will cease to exist and become extinct.
@GeorgeMonbiot A n-dimensional hypervolume niche is far too complex for anyone to understand, even partially. So the actual impacts of that climate shift and which species survive, which go into major decline, and which go extinct will be impossible to predict.
@GeorgeMonbiot Species have something of an ability to adapt for small variations in the climate, because the patterns of weather, and therefore local short term climate varies from year to year.
@GeorgeMonbiot However, over time these variations are usually evened out, but in a rapidly shifting climate being warmed by human carbon emissions there will be a trend of change, which are beyond the limits of what many species adapted to their current niches can cope with.
@GeorgeMonbiot This won't happen all at the same time, but it will effect nearly all species on Earth, all biodiversity, therefore drastically altering the n-dimensional hypervolume that the human species and its economy and food supply occupy.
@GeorgeMonbiot Humans and their economy, their autecology, rely on a myriad of what they call "ecosystem services", actually fairly normal deep interconnections which all species have with the ecosystem they live in. These interconnections are part of that n-dimensional hypervolume niche.
@GeorgeMonbiot Humans and their technology have something of an ability to adapt, by destroying more of that biodiversity and other natural systems, but soon their own economy and the niche it occupies, will get badly squeezed, until it collapses and changes.
@GeorgeMonbiot I've repeatedly tried to point out, that it is the ecological impacts of climate breakdown that are the biggest danger to the human population and its food supply, not the big physical changes we tend to think about.
@GeorgeMonbiot Despite the illusion, or should it be delusion, that we are apart from the rest of nature, we are as reliant on our niche and myriad relationships with other species as any other species. Not understanding something is not the same as that niche and interconnections not existing.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Stephen Barlow

Stephen Barlow Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SteB777

6 Oct
This is why the Net Zero by 2050 policy being promoted by governments is fake.

"The fossil fuel industry benefits from subsidies of $11m every minute, according to analysis by the International Monetary Fund."
theguardian.com/environment/20…
Whilst governments falsely claim to be "battling" the climate crisis with their #BlahBlahBlah, they are in fact massively supporting the fossil fuel industry and fossil fuel use with public money i.e. doing the exact opposite of what they claim to be doing.
This is very serious deceit. The vast majority know little about the climate crisis. They trust their governments to address it, and trust their media to inform them about it, and to inform them if their government is not doing what they claim.
Read 25 tweets
5 Oct
'Patel will say: “Today I can announce I will increase the maximum penalties for disrupting a motorway; criminalise interference with key infrastructures such as roads, railways and our free press ....'
theguardian.com/politics/2021/…
This is an illustration how dishonest not only the UK government is over their position on the climate crisis, but governments all around the world. These things getting special protection are all key components, which have driven and enabled the climate and ecological crisis.
Patel talks about the laughably and inappropriately named "free press". This is essentially a billionaire propaganda outfit, which promotes climate change denial, and supports the Conservative Party. That fails to hold this government to account. It is anything but free.
Read 9 tweets
4 Oct
"Several world leaders have denied any wrongdoing after a huge leak of documents revealed the secret financial dealings of the global elite."

Well they would do, wouldn't they.
independent.co.uk/news/world/pan…
The big question is this, why do so many world leaders, very rich people, celebrities and major Conservative Party donors appear in these leaked Pandora papers?
theguardian.com/news/2021/oct/…
These people are already incredibly rich, pay a smaller percentage in tax than the relatively low paid. So they hardly have any need to engage in schemes like this to evade a bit more tax. If they are a leader of a country, they are expecting their lowly paid citizens to pay tax.
Read 7 tweets
30 Sep
My points about wealth and carbon and consumption footprints are not ideological.

'Private jet providers are experiencing “unprecedented demand” from wealthy customers seeking to avoid the “mosh pit” of commercial flights ...'
theguardian.com/world/2021/sep…
"Private jets emit about 20 times more carbon dioxide per passenger mile than commercial flights, according to industry data."
This pattern is crystal clear.

"It says the world's wealthiest 1% produce double the combined carbon emissions of the poorest 50%, according to the UN."
bbc.co.uk/news/science-e…
Read 14 tweets
29 Sep
You see, if you do not see the world in the terms George describes, and hardly any does, then this is a basic thinking error. From birth we have been taught entirely false ideas about the world in which we live, and these falsehoods persist at the highest levels in academia.
Why isn't academia worried that most accounts of the world and whole academic fields are based on profoundly and demonstrable false views of the world we live in? Science supports the systems view and the interconnection of everything.
Nothing so far supports the mistaken view of the world being composed of separate objects with no connection to anything else. All the evidence is for whole system interconnection. Yet the fallacious world view, still predominates. Why?
Read 9 tweets
29 Sep
This is probably the most important newspaper article ever written, and every person in the world needs to properly understand what George has said here and in his thread. I can attest to the accuracy of everything George says. My own short thread below.
I've been trying to get this across for decades, there there is no climate crisis, just an ecological emergency, and that the climate crisis is just one small component of this, albeit a profoundly important component. The biggest ever mistake was dealing with climate separately.
It will be noted at the 1992 Rio Earth Summit, that all these crises were dealt with as a whole. That the climate crisis only get separated from the rest of ecological crisis after this summit.
un.org/en/conferences…
Read 23 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(