'Patel will say: “Today I can announce I will increase the maximum penalties for disrupting a motorway; criminalise interference with key infrastructures such as roads, railways and our free press ....' theguardian.com/politics/2021/…
This is an illustration how dishonest not only the UK government is over their position on the climate crisis, but governments all around the world. These things getting special protection are all key components, which have driven and enabled the climate and ecological crisis.
Patel talks about the laughably and inappropriately named "free press". This is essentially a billionaire propaganda outfit, which promotes climate change denial, and supports the Conservative Party. That fails to hold this government to account. It is anything but free.
This is simply turning the police into a private security force to protect damaging vested interests destroying the Earth's life support systems, and the propagandists facilitating it.
However, far worse than this, it makes environmentalists and concerned scientists falsely look like radical ideologues, simply they are trying to present the case based on science, about this crisis, which the media is failing to inform the public about.
Vested interests, billionaires and the politicians in their pocket abuse their power and wealth, to falsely present themselves as voices of moderation, and those arguing from the science, as extremists.
What is happening is this government, other governments, vested interests and the fossil fuel industry, want to present fake "net zero by 2050" as a solution, and are desperately trying to stop those in the know from pointing out to the public that they are being conned.
Having already stitched up the media, the government wants control of all means which informed people can use to inform the public of the huge danger they are in, and how serious the climate and ecological emergency is, and what a threat it is to the people.
There wouldn't be any need for NVDA, if governments simply heeded the scientific advice, and took appropriate action to avoid a completely avoidable ecological catastrophe, which will destroy over half the life on Earth and make much of our planet uninhabitable.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is why the Net Zero by 2050 policy being promoted by governments is fake.
"The fossil fuel industry benefits from subsidies of $11m every minute, according to analysis by the International Monetary Fund." theguardian.com/environment/20…
Whilst governments falsely claim to be "battling" the climate crisis with their #BlahBlahBlah, they are in fact massively supporting the fossil fuel industry and fossil fuel use with public money i.e. doing the exact opposite of what they claim to be doing.
This is very serious deceit. The vast majority know little about the climate crisis. They trust their governments to address it, and trust their media to inform them about it, and to inform them if their government is not doing what they claim.
The big question is this, why do so many world leaders, very rich people, celebrities and major Conservative Party donors appear in these leaked Pandora papers? theguardian.com/news/2021/oct/…
These people are already incredibly rich, pay a smaller percentage in tax than the relatively low paid. So they hardly have any need to engage in schemes like this to evade a bit more tax. If they are a leader of a country, they are expecting their lowly paid citizens to pay tax.
@GeorgeMonbiot Also, every ecosystem in the world and its biodiversity is primarily adapted to climate i.e. it's a major axis of that n-dimensional hypervolume. Meaning all species will become unadapted to the niche they currently occupy.
@GeorgeMonbiot As the climate shifts and every species becomes unadapted to the niche they currently occupy, some will be able to adapt to new niches, but many won't. Hence the mechanism by which many species will cease to exist and become extinct.
@GeorgeMonbiot A n-dimensional hypervolume niche is far too complex for anyone to understand, even partially. So the actual impacts of that climate shift and which species survive, which go into major decline, and which go extinct will be impossible to predict.
My points about wealth and carbon and consumption footprints are not ideological.
'Private jet providers are experiencing “unprecedented demand” from wealthy customers seeking to avoid the “mosh pit” of commercial flights ...' theguardian.com/world/2021/sep…
"Private jets emit about 20 times more carbon dioxide per passenger mile than commercial flights, according to industry data."
This pattern is crystal clear.
"It says the world's wealthiest 1% produce double the combined carbon emissions of the poorest 50%, according to the UN." bbc.co.uk/news/science-e…
You see, if you do not see the world in the terms George describes, and hardly any does, then this is a basic thinking error. From birth we have been taught entirely false ideas about the world in which we live, and these falsehoods persist at the highest levels in academia.
Why isn't academia worried that most accounts of the world and whole academic fields are based on profoundly and demonstrable false views of the world we live in? Science supports the systems view and the interconnection of everything.
Nothing so far supports the mistaken view of the world being composed of separate objects with no connection to anything else. All the evidence is for whole system interconnection. Yet the fallacious world view, still predominates. Why?
This is probably the most important newspaper article ever written, and every person in the world needs to properly understand what George has said here and in his thread. I can attest to the accuracy of everything George says. My own short thread below.
I've been trying to get this across for decades, there there is no climate crisis, just an ecological emergency, and that the climate crisis is just one small component of this, albeit a profoundly important component. The biggest ever mistake was dealing with climate separately.
It will be noted at the 1992 Rio Earth Summit, that all these crises were dealt with as a whole. That the climate crisis only get separated from the rest of ecological crisis after this summit. un.org/en/conferences…