Super excited to finally share this updated analysis on the countries most responsible for climate change, now including all sources of CO2:

US 509GtCO2
CN 284
RU 172
BR 113
ID 103
DE 88
IN 86
UK 74
JP 68
CA 65

1/n

carbonbrief.org/analysis-which…
We first published analysis of cumulative historical CO2 in 2019 & I've been talking / thinking about it ever since

Our new article (by me) + animation by @tomoprater tries to answer all the questions we've had over the years – please do read

2/

carbonbrief.org/analysis-which…
We've made 4 big additions:

📅fully updated through 2021
🌲CO2 from land-use change & forestry
🚢analysis of consumption emissions
👪analysis of cumulative CO2 per capita

3/

carbonbrief.org/analysis-which…
Since 1850, humans have collectively pumped more than 2,500GtCO2 into the atmosphere

2/3 from burning fossil fuels
1/3 from land-use change & forestry

That's directly linked to the 1.2C of warming to date

4/

carbonbrief.org/analysis-which…
So we've used up 86% of the carbon budget for a 50-50 chance of staying below 1.5C – or 89% of the budget for a 2/3 probability

There's just 10 / 7 years of budget left (😱)

carbonbrief.org/analysis-which…
Who got us into this mess? That question is at the heart of climate justice debates

Top 20 countries for cumulative CO2 since 1850 is topped by the US (20%) & China (11%)

Also v striking to see 🇧🇷🇮🇩 on the list thanks to deforestation…

6/

carbonbrief.org/analysis-which…
We also looked at consumption-based emissions accounting of CO2 in traded goods

I was surprised how little difference this made

It adds 0.3 percentage points share of cumulative total to US & JP, 0.2 for UK & DE; 1.1 points less for CN

7/

carbonbrief.org/analysis-which…
Then we looked at cumulative CO2 per capita…

It massively changes the rankings but breaks the direct link to current warming

And the results depend strongly on methodology

For me, it raises more Qs than it answers, but v interesting all the same

8/

carbonbrief.org/analysis-which…
For me personally – as a massive geek – the story of the data itself is fascinating

🤓🤓🤓

I hope, like me, you enjoy learning about what it is & where it comes from – I learned so much while researching this article

9/

carbonbrief.org/analysis-which…
I'd like to conclude by thanking a long list of ppl that helped with this analysis

Julia Pongratz
Gregg Marland
CDIAC
@Skee_WHRC
@robbie_andrew
@Peters_Glen
@PFriedling
@redouad
@OurWorldInData
@Carbon_Monitor

10/

carbonbrief.org/analysis-which…
Finally, thanks to @dpcarrington for some great coverage of our analysis at @guardianeco

theguardian.com/environment/20…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Simon Evans

Simon Evans Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DrSimEvans

21 Jul
How lobbying works Pt 994

Heat & transport are the "two key sectors which appear to have the strongest potential for hydrogen"

Really?

So says Council for Science & Technology, chaired by @uksciencechief to advise UK PM

And who *really* says that?

1/

assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…
The line comes from a letter to @beisgovuk secretary of state @KwasiKwarteng, PM & other senior ministers

The letter is billed as advice on decarbonising homes & the development of a hydrogen economy

It's signed by Patrick Vallance @uksciencechief

2/

assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…
But who actually wrote the advice?

"We would like to thank Dervilla Mitchell (Director of Arup) and Paul Stein (Chief Technology Officer, Rolls-Royce plc) for leading the briefing sessions and development of this advice."

3/

assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…
Read 11 tweets
6 Jul
Major new @OBR_UK report today on "fiscal risks" to UK has a big chapter on net-zero

OBR estimates net cost of net-zero by 2050 at £321bn

Crucially: "Unmitigated climate change would ultimately have catastrophic economic & fiscal consequences"

THREAD

obr.uk/frr/fiscal-ris…
The OBR identifies three "potentially catastrophic" sources of fiscal risk to the UK

These are the pandemic, unmitigated climate change & public sector debt

("the fiscal costs of reducing net emissions to zero…could be significant but not exceptional")

obr.uk/frr/fiscal-ris…
On net-zero, the @OBR_UK chapter is a really detailed and nuanced look at the costs, benefits and risks of (not) acting on climate change, over 69 dense pages

I'd encourage you to read it

obr.uk/frr/fiscal-ris…
Read 17 tweets
2 Jul
Today's Times frontpage is reporting govt plans to (consult on & then maybe) include heat & transport fuel in the UK's emissions trading scheme

A few thoughts

1/

thetimes.co.uk/article/gas-an…
We currently only pay for CO2 emissions from electricity generation & industry

This is…bonkers

Domestic gas use gets an effective *subsidy* of ~£100/tCO2

(Air travel is even worse – and look at road vs rail!)

HT @EnergySysCat, scribbles are mine

2/

es.catapult.org.uk/comment/carbon…
So as a matter of principle, it would make sense to have a CO2 price on gas and (all!) transport fuels

(Economists often bang on about harmonised economy-wide carbon pricing for optimum "efficiency")

✅Polluter pays
✅Shift fiscal incentives towards electricity

But…

3/
Read 12 tweets
24 May
In its WEO 2008 the IEA "reference scenario" suggested coal power would reach 12,000TWh by 2020

In reality, coal was 25% lower (-3,000TWh, equiv of overall EU demand)

Solar output was 8x higher than expected
Wind nearly twice as high

What else was different?

1/

HT @KetanJ0
Gas, hydro, wind and solar all significantly outperformed the IEA's reference scenario expectations from 2008, whereas nuclear and coal were lower

Demand overall was lower than expected, too

2/
There are at least two ways to read this

A) yah boo, the IEA got it wrong on renewables (again)
B) the world implemented a lot of new climate policy since 2008, beyond the static view of the 2008 "reference scenario" (pic)

…but really it's (C), a mixture of both

3/
Read 6 tweets
18 May
THREAD

So many remarkable things in today's @IEA net-zero by 2050 report. Here are a few:

⛏️ immediate end to new fossil fuel extraction
🏭 unabated fossil energy plummets

-98% coal
-91% oil
-88% gas

🌞 solar becomes largest energy source

1/

carbonbrief.org/iea-renewables…
IEA boss Fatih Birol calls the net-zero scenario "the energy future we all need to focus on"

Not hard to see why:

🌡️ avoids 1.5C
⚡️ universal energy access
😷 2m fewer premature pollution deaths
💵 increases global GDP

2/

carbonbrief.org/iea-renewables…
There's one big problem…

The world's currently on track for 2.7C (STEPS)
Even all the net-zero goals mean 2.1C (APC)

…leaving a 22GtCO2 ambition gap in 2050 to stay below 1.5C (NZE)

"[the] gap between rhetoric and action needs to close"

3/

carbonbrief.org/iea-renewables…
Read 8 tweets
23 Apr
The UK govt has formally issued draft legislation, making its 78% by 2035 climate goal into law

legislation.gov.uk/ukdsi/2021/978…
It does not (yet) legislate to include international aviation and shipping in the budget, but additional regulations on that will follow

legislation.gov.uk/ukdsi/2021/978…
for reference, here's Article 30 of the Climate Change Act under which international aviation and shipping will be included

legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2008/27/…
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(