Today's Times frontpage is reporting govt plans to (consult on & then maybe) include heat & transport fuel in the UK's emissions trading scheme

A few thoughts

1/

thetimes.co.uk/article/gas-an…
We currently only pay for CO2 emissions from electricity generation & industry

This is…bonkers

Domestic gas use gets an effective *subsidy* of ~£100/tCO2

(Air travel is even worse – and look at road vs rail!)

HT @EnergySysCat, scribbles are mine

2/

es.catapult.org.uk/comment/carbon…
So as a matter of principle, it would make sense to have a CO2 price on gas and (all!) transport fuels

(Economists often bang on about harmonised economy-wide carbon pricing for optimum "efficiency")

✅Polluter pays
✅Shift fiscal incentives towards electricity

But…

3/
As @EnergySysCat chief exec says "a carbon tax is not the silver bullet" and "imposing a pure carbon tax is fraught with compromises and political revolt…Gilet Jaunes a l’Angleterre, anyone?"

4/

es.catapult.org.uk/comment/carbon…
Check out @timbolord thread for more on what else would need to change if gas / transport are to face a carbon price, crucially including policy to support vulnerable households and ministers publicly making the case for change

5/

I'll just end by saying that the Times story is obviously based on leaked info, which may be selective & may not reflect govt plans in the round

Not only that, but any big changes of this sort would be subject to public consultation

Let's see what is actually proposed

6/ends
One last thing to add!

@RichHallCA had a thoughtful blog yesterday on the question of whether and how to shift climate & social policy costs off electricity bills, paying for them via gas bills or taxes. Def worth a read.

7/6

wearecitizensadvice.org.uk/an-electrifyin…
OK OK, there's more

The EU is currently going through the same discussions about whether to expand CO2 pricing to heat + transport

8/

reuters.com/business/susta…
Leaked draft EUETS reform proposals would expand coverage to shipping fuel but heat + transport would be dealt with under a separate scheme, with revenues used to support vulnerable households

9/

reuters.com/business/susta…
Despite proposed efforts to manage impacts of CO2 pricing on heat + transport at EU level, the idea has still faced criticism for being "unfair and ineffective"

(NB part of this critique is nullified by the idea of a separate ETS for heat/transport)

10/

montelnews.com/en/news/119439…
New study from @CambridgeEcon (funded by ECF – full disclosure, ECF funds CB too) suggests including heat/transport in the EUETS would have limited impact on CO2, but high social cost

11/

europeanclimate.org/resources/impa…
Finally, Germany has already introduced carbon pricing for heat and transport under a national ETS

Handy primers here:

pinsentmasons.com/out-law/analys…

cleanenergywire.org/factsheets/ger…

12/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Simon Evans

Simon Evans Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DrSimEvans

24 May
In its WEO 2008 the IEA "reference scenario" suggested coal power would reach 12,000TWh by 2020

In reality, coal was 25% lower (-3,000TWh, equiv of overall EU demand)

Solar output was 8x higher than expected
Wind nearly twice as high

What else was different?

1/

HT @KetanJ0
Gas, hydro, wind and solar all significantly outperformed the IEA's reference scenario expectations from 2008, whereas nuclear and coal were lower

Demand overall was lower than expected, too

2/
There are at least two ways to read this

A) yah boo, the IEA got it wrong on renewables (again)
B) the world implemented a lot of new climate policy since 2008, beyond the static view of the 2008 "reference scenario" (pic)

…but really it's (C), a mixture of both

3/
Read 6 tweets
18 May
THREAD

So many remarkable things in today's @IEA net-zero by 2050 report. Here are a few:

⛏️ immediate end to new fossil fuel extraction
🏭 unabated fossil energy plummets

-98% coal
-91% oil
-88% gas

🌞 solar becomes largest energy source

1/

carbonbrief.org/iea-renewables…
IEA boss Fatih Birol calls the net-zero scenario "the energy future we all need to focus on"

Not hard to see why:

🌡️ avoids 1.5C
⚡️ universal energy access
😷 2m fewer premature pollution deaths
💵 increases global GDP

2/

carbonbrief.org/iea-renewables…
There's one big problem…

The world's currently on track for 2.7C (STEPS)
Even all the net-zero goals mean 2.1C (APC)

…leaving a 22GtCO2 ambition gap in 2050 to stay below 1.5C (NZE)

"[the] gap between rhetoric and action needs to close"

3/

carbonbrief.org/iea-renewables…
Read 8 tweets
23 Apr
The UK govt has formally issued draft legislation, making its 78% by 2035 climate goal into law

legislation.gov.uk/ukdsi/2021/978…
It does not (yet) legislate to include international aviation and shipping in the budget, but additional regulations on that will follow

legislation.gov.uk/ukdsi/2021/978…
for reference, here's Article 30 of the Climate Change Act under which international aviation and shipping will be included

legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2008/27/…
Read 9 tweets
23 Apr
How big are the new climate pledges from the US, UK, EU, Canada & Japan?

I reckon they could cut emissions in 2030 by roughly an extra 2bn tonnes of CO2e

That's quite a lot…

…but still tiny compared with the 12-32GtCO2e "emissions gap" to 1.5 or 2C

carbonbrief.org/unep-net-zero-…
This is very much a back-of-the-envelope number and depends what you assume would have happened, before the new pledges.

We can expect to see more sophisticated estimates from @climateactiontr & @UNEP
@climateactiontr @UNEP Also – this assumes the new ambitions are turned into reality

That's very much a big "if"
Read 4 tweets
22 Apr
We've now had four big new climate goals announced

UK -68% below 1990
EU -55% below 1990
US -52% below 2005
JP -46% below 2013

Who is most ambitious?

Depends on the baseline…

1990 UK>EU>US>JP
2005 UK>US>EU>JP
2013 UK>US>EU>JP
2018 US>UK>EU>JP
For those that prefer ugly spreadsheet tables…
Read 4 tweets
29 Mar
The world's electricity over the past 30yrs:

1990 🏭🏭🏭🏭🏭🏭💦💦☢️☢️ (64% fossil)
2000 🏭🏭🏭🏭🏭🏭💦💦☢️☢️
2010 🏭🏭🏭🏭🏭🏭🏭💦💦☢️
2020 🏭🏭🏭🏭🏭🏭💦💦☢️🌄 (61%)

😭😭😭

Plus ça change? 🧵

(Data: BP / @EmberClimate)
Here's the same data in chart form…

Fossil fuels supplied 64% of the world's electricity in 1990 and that fell by just 3 percentage points over the following three decades to 2020 (61%)
But let's take a peak underneath the bonnet…

To begin, let's make this *even more depressing* by looking at amounts as well as percentages

Because fossil electricity supplies have *more than doubled* since 1990 – and that what matters for CO2

(even tho gas better than coal)
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(