This is just one unhinged draconian soundbite after another. Ending freedom to protest. Increasing prohibition on drugs, because that's worked so well. None of what she is suggesting is going to make Britain "safer" #CPC21
Jesus, the smirk when saying "ended free movement". Not sure I'd boast about "building back better" and recruiting "skilled migrants" right now to tbh @pritipatel
"Where there is a door there must be a doorkeeper". Give me strength. 98% of those crossing the channel seek asylum so the "majority are economic migrants" line is pure bs
You know why people can appeal? It's because the Home Office cocks up so much on first application. That's why so many appeals are successful, because they are legitimate claims.
If anyone is doing a drinking game for when Patel says "Economic migrants" good luck and God bless your liver
Worth remembering that the government's own impact assessment showed that Patel's new plan for immigration would benefit traffickers, have little no effect on asylum numbers and would increase discrimination. #CPC21
It is not illegal to seek asylum and an asylum seeker is protected against penalisation for their manner of entry by international law. Criminalising people for manner of entry is illegal, plain a simple.
Oh ffs. Asylum seekers/refugees are statistically the least likely group to be a terrorist. Not hard to see why when they have to cross borders and face more checks than other groups.
Oh brilliant, "the military". yeah because a gunship is really what is needed. By the way, again, pushbacks as proposed here are illegal and cost lives.
"Damage to the labour market". F**k me, they could at least be consistent. You can't claim that you need immigration in one breath and then claim they are destroying the labour market
Of course she goes off one about deportations. All of this is bollock though. Her plans aren't just illegal, they actually harm the UK, particularly on the global stage. This isn't a speech. It's a batshit crazy rant.
Okay, quick fact check: Smuggler and traffickers are different things, minor but kind of important. By making it harder to seek asylum you actually force people into the hands of traffickers, who often don't say where they are taking people.
Criminalising asylum seekers for their manner of entry will likewise play to traffickers, because they have an added threat, turning people into authorities, to use to control their victims.
As the government's own impact study showed, closing routes just forces people to make longer and more dangerous ones, again with the need for gangs to facilitate them, expect the gangs charge more for doing so.
This is where the difference between smugglers and traffickers plays a part. Smugglers are transactional, taking payment for facilitating crossings. As prices go up it makes it unaffordable, which forces people to use traffickers, who exploit people after the journey.
As for pusbacks, not only do they violate multiple international laws, crossing into another countries waters could constitute an act of war. They are unrealistic, don't work, and, as seen elsewhere, cost lives when attempted.
Yeah, I'm sure Patel's #CPC21 speech went down well with her base, but nothing she said will do anything other than put more lives at risk. It's a tiny fraction of asylum seekers who cross the channel in the grand scheme, but those who do may have good reason.
Last year France was found guilty of violating refugee rights, and asylum seekers and NGO personnel are routinely attacked by police there. Similar issues occur across Europe. You can't decide that somewhere is safe for someone else.
That's before the not insubstantial matter that you can't just drop someone off in a country which hasn't accepted them, and as France et al have already said no you can't just "send people back".
The serious irony of @pritipatel's #CPC21 speech is that despite her whole "I support law and order" spiel, she is the one advocating for massive and fundamental breaches of multiple laws, in a manner which destroys lives.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Daniel Sohege 🧡

Daniel Sohege 🧡 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @stand_for_all

7 Oct
Thread: Okay, there is a very clear principle in international law called "non-refoulement", which is in theory meant to prevent people being sent back to unsafe countries, you know, like Afghanistan. 1/ independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-n…
Here's the thing, principle and practice in international law don't always marry up as nicely as may be hoped, which is why EU tends to get away with sending asylum seekers back to Libya, where it's well documented they risk being killed or tortured. 2/
So in reality government is unlikely to face substantial legal interference beyond what they are already used to, hence why Patel is happy to keep pushing the "activist lawyers" line, because any legal challenge strengthens their case with their base. 3/ dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8…
Read 16 tweets
7 Oct
Less than a week ago French authorities were shooting asylum seekers in a dinghy with rubber bullets. HRW has now released further degrading treatment against refugees by them. Croatian authorities are beating them and throwing them back across the border. 1/
Greece is conducting pushback operations putting their lives at risk. Italy just prosecuted one of its own mayor's for providing assistance to refugees. Spain forces many to sleep rough. Germany had more than 1,600 attacks against them last year. 2/
And on and on it goes, and on top of all this the EU sends refugees back to Libya where they are known to be kidnapped, sold into slavery, tortured and murdered. You know what, I'm thinking there's some good reasons why asylum seekers may not stay in these "safe countries". 3/
Read 5 tweets
5 Oct
It is genuinely hard to see how some of the @Conservatives defending things coming out of #cpc21 can claim to have any semblance of a commitment to "conservativism". Funnily enough, this isn't a "get" at Conservatives though. Some of the biggest issues are apolitical. 1/
When you see the language and attacks from likes of Raab and Patel though, and the cheers which they received, you have to wonder what happened to some of the old school, small state, individual liberties, Conservatives. 2/
I grew up in a household of them. My mum used to collect Margaret Thatcher memorabilia. Pretty much my first memories are of sitting watching her in Council Meetings, where she was a Conservative Councillor. Before she died she was about to run for Parliament. 3/
Read 25 tweets
28 Sep
Slightly concerned by the language here. There's a lot going on, but mainly, I'm curious how if they arrived yesterday they've been properly assessed as to eligibility already. "Economic migrants" has also become quite a loaded term which is used by too many to deny protection 1/
In the current globally hostile environment, I would also worry about the phrasing of "asylum management and legal migration pathways". The issue here is how these phrases are picked up on in order to further deny asylum applications from those entering via irregular methods. 2/
I am not blind to the issues which UNHCR has to deal with, including needing to maintain relations with States who may not wish to accept asylum seekers, but choice of words needs to be made with an eye to how they are used in wider context to deny protection for so many. 3/
Read 8 tweets
28 Sep
It is great that more people, particularly women, are able to get an autism diagnosis these days. It was far too stigmatized for far too long. It's still not exactly easy as an adult though #r4today, and it can be incredibly intrusive and distressing when you are diagnosed. 1/
Personally I'm pleased I did get diagnosed and have found it has helped me understand who I am better. For years after being diagnosed though I hid it from myself as much as anyone else. Until then I had always thought if I tried just a little harder to fit in it would happen. 2/
Should be highly interesting to look at the study by University if Exeter, but I am concerned that some reporting on it, such as the negative framing here, is going to fuel claims that "you can't be autistic" if you can communicate or maintain a relationship etc. 3/ Image
Read 9 tweets
25 Sep
And minute UK did carry out pushbacks it would be bogged down in never ending litigation. Even Immigration Services Union admits tactics are "unusable". Just PR meat to the base while waiting for numbers to drop, as they always do around this time of year.
thetimes.co.uk/article/f16895…
Here's the thing, yes they've been up on previous years, mainly due to other routes still being more limited, but Channel crossings are basically seasonal. They always increase around this point as people try and make journey before weather turns and it become far too dangerous.
Home Office aren't stupid, they know there is about to be the annual winter drop in crossings. They also know minute they conduct illegal pushbacks they open a can of worms they really don't want to. Hopefully they're playing for time until asylum seekers leave the front pages.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(