Doctors used to say kids don’t need anaesthetic or painkillers… because they did not recognise pain in very young children.
Kids do need protection from COVID-19. The very young may take years to be able to tell us what is happening.
If a child is younger but developmentally capable to wear a mask, I think it should be gently encouraged.
If developmental delay becomes apparent, you can refer to a specialist and work on the problem to help catch up. There are many ways to prevent it too. Clear masks, daily reading time etc.
What we don’t know how to treat, and might not be able to reverse, is the developmental issues caused by COVID-19 meningitis and encephalitis in children, as well as the autoimmune issues afterwards.
Hence, on a balance of risks, it may be better to lean more towards risking the thing we can treat, than the thing we don’t know anything much about.
Over time, there is a chance I may be wrong on this, but I am not alone in this view. CDC and AAP both advise this way.
The point being… just because we think little kids do better with COVID-19, doesn’t necessarily mean we know that all will be well.
Diagnosis has always been harder in kids, even after they can speak in sentences.
We should give them a chance to avoid COVID-19.
There are some people that genuinely believe that catching COVID-19 in early childhood may be beneficial in the long term.
My understanding so far leads me to believe that this is a risk that is not worth taking.->
Vaccines, when available, are much less likely to cause the same level of superantigen stimulation, T cell indiscriminate activation, T cell loss. ->
What this translates to is a poorly regulated immune system in the long term. Attacking things it shouldn’t, unable to attack things it should.
SARS2 itself is not a great immunity therapy in my opinion.
The level of protection provided by natural infection is not looking very durable either.
Basically you pay premium price with your immune systems cells, and get very little reward with actual immunity against the disease.
In conclusion, vaccines when available are better than disease, very little advantage immunity wise to catching the disease, and if little kids can wear a mask safely, I think they should be allowed and gently encouraged to do so.
We have to weather the storm for a while yet.
Vaccines for very young children (less than 5) are not available or tested yet, if they are safe they would be desirable. If no safe vaccines can be found, then it is better to shelter children from COVID-19 until they can be vaccinated as best at possible.->
That means everyone else getting vaccinated, community masks, and ventilation to try to protect as many little eggs as possible and get them to an age where they can be vaccinated safely.
Correction, I think one vaccine has been used in children above three, but I can’t remember which one…
Should also add “don’t put masks on kids less than 2 yrs old”… they can over heat easily and may not know how to remove them.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
CDC defines influenza as an epidemic disease. Even though it has been around for ages, and is never truly gone from the earth, it comes and goes in waves. COVID-19 will likely be similar.
Endemic illness stays at a constant level roughly.
I don’t think you can just decide to call something endemic at an arbitrary point in time… it has to show some characteristics of steady rate of disease.
I hope we don’t chose to allow COVID-19 to be at very high endemic levels, or have large epidemics. Would be better if it was sporadic outbreaks. Much safer.
All I have to say to this incredibly monstrous strategy is… the UK is actually just making more straw to burn.
A significantly weakened herd will be fighting the flu/rsv/rhinovirus etc this year.
Why would you try to protect a health system, instead of protecting people when you could do both by keeping case numbers low and incentivising vaccination?
Even taking testing difficulties into account, the whole world is slowly reducing COVID-19 cases.
Australia however wants to follow the example of the hardest hit countries in the world.
Why?
More examples of the many countries around the world that are slowly vaccinating, ventilating, and wearing masks by and large.
All doing their best to control disease.
There is a fiction going around that there is no point controlling disease in places like Australia because other countries can’t/won’t control disease.
It’s not 100% true. With far less resources, many countries are controlling disease.
What can I say to make the world wake up to the danger of COVID-19?
What can I say to help people to understand that infecting kids is not OK?
Dementia
Left bodies
Parkinson’s like movement disorders.
Memory problems with loss similar to lead poisoning.
Switching on the immune system in bad ways so it harms you (autoimmune disorders).
->
Attacking T cells and any CD45 expressing cell making future immunity a problem. (T cells that might have protected from cancer and other infections.)
Damaging the heart.
Damaging the blood vessels.
If your child's classroom does not have a CO2 monitor to prove ventilation is adequate, or an adequately sized HEPA filter to ensure clean air, your child is not in a safe classroom.
If there is one child in your class that is unmasked, and that child gets infected, all others, including teachers, are at increased risk of high dose inoculation. Your child's mask may not be enough to protect them.
It's every person for themselves now.
What a spectacular mess. Unprepared. Unsafe. Financial support withdrawal means kids will be forced into unsafe classrooms in NSW. The youngest cohort unvaccinated.