Delhi High Court is hearing a plea seeking a declaration that the #PMCares Fund classifies as "State" under Article 12 of the Constitution.

@PMOIndia @narendramodi
Sr. Adv. Shyam Divan appearing for the petitioner Samyak Gangwal: There is an attempt to portray the fund as being part of the Government of India.

#PMCares
Divan: If the fund is not State under Art.12 it should be restrained from using the prefix "PM", and the centre should not extend secretarial support to the fund.

#PMCares @PMOIndia @narendramodi
Divan: Using the PM's name in the fund itself makes it a government fund, let me get to that. The PM himself is the settler in this Trust and a "Deed of Trust" has been executed by the PM in "public interest".

@PMOIndia @narendramodi
Divan: This institution building is of a "permanent character."
Pointing out that the amount collected in the fund can also be used for schemes by the Prime Minister for calamities, natural disasters, Divan says a public purpose of the "widest objective".

#PMCares @PMOIndia @narendramodi
Court adjourns the matter for post lunch.
Bench reassembles.
Divan: They say that this Trust is not created by or under the Constitution of India or by or under any law of the Parliament.
Divan: They say no judicial review, basically, but judicial review is a part of the basic structure and therefore this self declaration cannot stand.
Divan: A Trust cannot say "I am not the state" and merely because it says so, it can't be that nobody can examine it.

#PMCares @narendramodi @PMOIndia
Divan: I don't think even the courts can set up a Trust like this and say that look the 5-senior most judges will be the ex-officio members but the Trust won't be "State".

#PMCares @narendramodi @PMOIndia
Divan: This is an extra-ordinarily unhealthy precedent.

#PMCares @narendramodi @PMOIndia
Divan reads out clause which says that @PMOIndia will provide secretarial support to the Trust.

Divan: The moment you use the words ex-officio it means that they will be dominant - 4 are ex-officio, including the Prime Minister.
Divan: In light of a Constitutional Bench judgment there is no way that this can not come under the definition of State.
Divan: Cl.14 says the Trustees are bound to maintain documents, regulations, accounts of books. Audits are done by someone appointed by the Trustee, if it is a state the audits have to be done in a different manner.
Divan: The use of the emblem with the #PMCares Fund is very important because it gives the fund an official sanction and faith is placed on the emblem.

@PMOIndia @narendramodi
Divan: I'm referring to a decision of the court -

HC: No Sir, we are not having the judgment.

Divan: Then I'll come back to it later. The message I've received is Compilation 2 is served.
HC: You may refer the compilation.

Divan: Alright, if we're pleased to go to Pg 173, the judgment of Pradeep Kumar Biswas is there.
Divan: Your Lordships, so this is a constitutional bench judgment of 7 judges.

#PMCares @PMOIndia
Divan reads through various other judgments.

HC: Let me note down, you are going so fast, we are not stenographers.

Divan: I'm so sorry.

HC: You're going nicely but we have to also note down.

#CourtroomExchange @shreyagarwal_12

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with LawBeat

LawBeat Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @LawBeatInd

7 Oct
Delhi High Court is hearing a plea pointing out the poor condition of the LNJP Hospital, New Delhi stating that dead bodies are lying in the same ward for 5, 10, 20 hours and they are not releasing them. Image
Petitioner's counsel: There are 3 people on the same bed.

"It is high time that your hospitals gear up", Delhi High Court tells @AamAadmiParty led Delhi Govt.
HC: Who are you?

Petitioner: My Lords, I was being treated at the hospital.

HC: And are you treated?

Petitioner: Yes, my Lords.

HC: Mr. Aggarwal (for Delhi Govt) is smiling. You've been treated by LNJP, hope you're thankful for that.
Read 14 tweets
7 Oct
[Cordelia Cruise Drugs Case] Delhi High Court Delhi based event organizer Arjun Jain who has moved court aggrieved by media reports from @IndiaToday over his alleged involvement in the case despite no summons having been issued to him by the @narcoticsbureau Image
Adv Nisha Bhambhani appears for respondents, begins addressing the Court.

Adv Adit S Pujari appearing for Arjun Jain, interjects.

HC: Mr. Pujari you have to learn some.. she's not arguing the case.
Court tells the parties that if anything is to be filed they may do so in the next half an hour so the court can hear the matter after lunch.

@CordeliaCruises @narcoticsbureau
Read 5 tweets
7 Oct
SupremeCourt to hear plea filed by BJP MP @Swamy39 seeking direction to frame guidelines to prevent huge Non- Performing Assets in Banking Sector. Image
Swamy: Your lordships had made an observation about the need to consider ways to deal with large size NPA

Justice DYC: This is basically a legislative juridiction.

Swamy: Form a committee a present a report
Justice Nath: RBI and ministries have been framing guidelines from time to time.

Swamy: It doesn’t bar the court from considering this matter.
Read 7 tweets
7 Oct
#SupremeCourt to hear over the issue of sentence in a matter where Rajeev Dahiya had been held guilty of Contempt of Court in a plea for non-payment of cost of Rs. 25 Lakh in PIL filed by Suraz India Trust who was later banned from filing PILs for life.
Rajiv Daiya appearing in person submitted that Milords I have submitted another unconditional apology.

Justice Kaul- Earlier also we said that there is no necessity.

Daiya: I had no other intention.
Justice Kaul said, it's your way of raising issue then you make alligations.

Daiya- Milords, This is my true Apology.

Court said, How many times this will occur it is not pleasure of ours to convict somebody.
Read 6 tweets
7 Oct
SupremeCourt to hear plea challenging the amended reservation(s) policy by the Government of India to provide 27% reservation for OBCs and 10% reservation for (EWS) in AIQ scheme for undergraduate and postgraduate medical/dental courses from current academic year 2021-22 onwards. Image
Natraj, ASG preliminary objection: All the issues are a subject matter of petitions pending before a larger bench. There is also a misjoinder of parties like States, they are not before the court since its AIQ seats
Natraj: DOPT and Social justice department are not made parties.
Read 43 tweets
7 Oct
#SupremeCourt to continue hearing Jarnail Singh, a matter it had decided in 2018, wherein a constitution bench held that the issue relating to reservation in promotion has already been decided in Nagraj’s matter and needs no reconsideration.
#Reservation
#JarnailSingh Image
Senior Advocate Gopal Sankaranarayanan continues hearing

Court said, Mr Sankaranarayanan, AG Argued in the Jarnail Singh reservation on the basis of population, then what can we do, we cannot go against Jarnail Singh.
Sankaranarayanan- Milords on the basis of representation in the houses reservation of Anglo's has been done away with and the SC/ST continues.
That is why 334 provided a timeline. There has to be some sort of timeline with reference to reservation also.
Read 19 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(