Let me engage in the "EU-vs-US-at-the-same-scale" comparison in a slightly different manner, hopefully more informative about the different trajectories car-dominated planning took in the postwar years

Because the problem is not only how many freeways the US built, but how 🧵 ImageImageImageImage
A premise: Italy engaged in one of the most extensive freeway building program in Europe starting from the 1950s. The 1955 so-called "Romita Plan" for the development of a nation-wide motorway network actually slightly predates the Federal Aid Highway Act of 1956 ImageImageImageImage
The single main difference is maybe less in the quantity and rapidity of the development, but how it was developed: the Italian one, was essentially intended as an intercity network that barely brushed past cities quite far from the core. A few examples >>
Florence vs Hartford, similarly sized metro areas (800k)
In Florence, the A1 ring is on avg. 5-7 km from the city center. In Hartford is actually through the city center Image
Milan and Boston, similar in population. In Milan, the "Tangenziale Est" is at most 5km from then Duomo. In Boston, I93 run at 150m from the Faneuil Hall Image
Turin and Providence, both having a metro population around 1.5 million. Average distance of Turin's Tangenziale from the Center: 8-9 km. Providence...well, you know: right in the middle. Image
Final example: Rome vs Philly (Philly metro is larger though, 5 vs 4 million). The G.R.A. ring motorway in Rome is between 7-11 km from the center. In Philly the freeway cross through the center. Image
The rational for the development of Italian motorways was mainly for intercity traffic. Rings and "tangenziali" (i.e. tangential roads, a common feature in Italy), actually came later as by-passes/ connections between freeways terminating at the edge of the then built-up area
Of course the size of those infrastructure is also quite different on both sides of the continent. But it is how they relate to the city that really makes the difference, not only the fact that the US has more of them or larger ones
That said, the history is a bit more complex, as there are forms of grade separated double-carriageways arterials/urban fast roads in Italy that are sort of mini or light urban freeway, see for example the uncomplete "tangenziale Est" and the "Circovallazione Interna" of Rome.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Marco Chitti

Marco Chitti Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ChittiMarco

10 Oct
A reminder that in the 1960s the dominance of the private automobile was still considered an inevitable destiny for cities worldwide: the urban freeway and renewal program for Providence is uncritically presented in a 1964 issue of the Italian journal "Urbanistica" ImageImageImageImage
Not to say that this was the only dominant idea among planner circles, but it was generally acknowledged as a mainstream idea that cities needed to make room for more cars, whatever it costs. But to what extent adapt the city to the car was the matter of intense debates.
In fact, the sane journal published a very critical review of the impact of the freeway-sation of urban boulevards in Rome, that involved grade-separared intersections and extensive tree cutting to accommodate more traffic lanes. ImageImageImage
Read 4 tweets
9 Oct
Exploring Pointe Saint-Charles. Quite a different urban landscape from the ones people associate with Montréal. This area was developed before the age of plexes.
So it's dominated by various types of "single family "Maisonnettes de ville" and multy-family "maison de faubourg" ImageImageImageImage
And, of course, Montréal's parallel world: the ruelles. ImageImageImageImage
Bonus pic: the new but underused Exo commuter train's Operation and Maintenance facility at Pointe St-Charles. Image
Read 5 tweets
21 Sep
1/ Let's play a little game for this post-election day.

What if we superpose the major planned or under construction transit projects in the Greater Montréal to the provincial and federal electoral maps?

An entertaining thread (with some political insights)
2/ Let's start with the REM, the Réseau Express Métropolitain, that we can possibly call the REL - Réseau Express Liberal-o-tain, as it is designed to hit perfectly a full jackpot of Liberal strongholds both at provincial and federal level
3/ The REM de l'Est, a creature of the current government, hits the sparsely populated but CAQ/BQ dominated East Island tip. It's somehow a REM-d'la-CAQ, especially the eastern leg.
The reason it brush past some Québec Solidaire circonscriptions is just b/c they are on the way.
Read 8 tweets
26 Aug
One of the various criticism against the REM is the fact that it will take over the Mont-Royal tunnel, the only route that allows through running via the Gare Centrale, notably for ViaRail High Frequency Train.

I think this criticism is not completely fair. I'll tell you why.
A premise: I've criticized the REM project at length on what I think are several shortcomings in the planning and implementation phases, but I don't want to be hostile to the project aprioristically and just relate taken-for-granted opinions.
Let's imagine that Montréal, instead of doing the REM, took the RER GO approach: transform its infrequent commuter rail network in a modern, electrified, frequent S-Bahn. Let's just forget for a second all the issues with CP,CN, the bridges etc.
Read 18 tweets
26 Aug
A couple of consideration about transit spending for operation in Italy, following @yfreemark 's piece about the US

In Italy, public subsidies amounts to € 6.6 bn annually (2017), but mostly comes from the "federal":
Central govt -> € 4.8 bn (72%)
Local govt -> € 1.8 bn (28%)
That covered some 2 bn in vehicle*km of service (incl. bus/tram/metro/train/ferry), for 5.2 billion passengers, for a total costs (subsidy+fares) of € 11 bn divided as 7 bn for urban transit (4€/vehicle*km) and 4 bn for rail (15.5€/train*km), the rest for ferry
note that that data is uncomplete, though. It covers only the regions with "ordinary statute" and not the four regions with autonomous statute and the two autonomous provinces, that encompass a little less than 1/6 of the population
Read 11 tweets
25 Aug
Should I work, or should I tell y'all the story of that weird giant roundabout and of the forever-soon-to-be-opened rail line that cross it ?
Or maybe we can talk about the even bigger one, 6km in radius, a little bit to the West, circling around Bitonto...
Ok, that's the wikipedia article (Italian only): it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strada_Po…

it's called the "Polygonal Road" and was built in the postwar years (46-48) for what looks like weird reasons in a country that was in rubbles...
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(