1/10
Chinese and foreign analysts who have made similar claims over the years as this Xinhua Commentary never distinguish between types of "bearish" views. But their approach, if taken seriously, would actually makes things worse for China.

news.cn/english/2021-1…
2/10
While I agree that those who have predicted imminent political, financial or social collapses have gotten it wrong — mainly because they failed to understand the structure of the Chinese financial system — for well over a decade the most sophisticated critique was not...
3/10
that China was about to collapse (which was always very unlikely) but rather that the Chinese economy was locked into an unsustainable process, and that the longer it took to adjust, the longer and more difficult the adjustment would be.
4/10
This is a very different prediction. In the past — e.g. the SOE reforms of the 1990s, the banking crisis of the 2000s, SARS in 2003, the collapse of China's trade surplus in 2009, COVID, etc. — whenever China faced a problem that threatened the pace of its economic...
5/10
growth, Beijing always responded by accelerating debt creation and pumping up property and infrastructure investment by enough to maintain targeted GDP growth rates. It didn't adjust, in other words, but rather goosed growth by exacerbating the underlying imbalances.
6/10
That is why it had always been "successful" in seeing off a crisis. But when the main problem threatening further growth becomes soaring debt and the sheer amount of non-productive investment in property and infrastructure, it is...
7/10
obvious, or should be, that accelerating debt creation and pumping up property and infrastructure investment can no longer be a sustainable solution. All this can do is worsen the underlying imbalances and raise further the future cost of adjustment.
8/10
Anyone with some basic knowledge of economic history will have seen this many times before. As rapid unbalanced growth continues over time, two things always seem to happen. First, vested interests (and political apologists) will insist that this case is...
9/10
unlike previous cases, and the fact that the process has gone on for so long proves that it isn't unsustainable. And second, as the process continues, the imbalances become greater and the ultimate resolution more difficult and costly.
10/10
The point here isn't that there is nothing Beijing can do to reduce the adjustment cost. It is that it can only do so with a radical transformation of its growth model. Pretending otherwise, as this Xinhua article does, simply reinforces the historical pattern.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Michael Pettis

Michael Pettis Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @michaelxpettis

10 Oct
1/7
Very interesting article. A series of Chinese studies may be discovering something about the high-speed rail system that France had already learned: rather than boost the economies of secondary cities, being connected...

scmp.com/news/china/sci… via @SCMPNews
2/7
to the HSR may actually reduce economic activity and encourage a brain drain. Even patent applications in secondary cities have dropped significantly, according to one study, after the city was connected to a high-speed line.
3/7
If this is true, it undermines the claim that even if much of the HSR is not economically viable today, it will generate enough growth in the less economically advanced areas to become viable in the future. The value of HSR is more likely to decline than to increase.
Read 11 tweets
8 Oct
1/8
In 2006-07 I published an article in the now-defunct (and lamented) FEER about prices of Chinese banks stocks, which at the time were trading at 3-4 times book value.

http://200.144.254.127:8080/english/archives/oldsiteinenglish/articlesbooks/pettischinasvolatility.pdf
2/8
This was much higher than the major international banks, and while that was widely interpreted by analysts (and senior Chinese bankers) as evidence of the high quality of Chinese banks, I argued instead that these high prices told us something very different.
3/8
If you analyzed prices within a classic option framework, it was clear that most of the value in Chinese bank-stock prices represented time value, and not intrinsic value, and so mainly reflected very high growth expectations and the volatility around those expectations.
Read 9 tweets
7 Oct
1/7
We have to be very careful about this type of incremental thinking. An advisor to the PBoC argues that “providing migrant workers in Chinese cities with full access to local government services would boost their consumption by as much as 30 per cent.”
scmp.com/economy/china-…
2/7
While this might technically be true, it doesn’t necessarily follow that overall consumption would rise. In fact it is unlikely. Granting migrant workers the same legal status as local residents and giving them the same access to health, education and the social safety net...
3/7
will certainly cause them to consume more, by indirectly raising their incomes, but it effectively does so by transferring income from some other sector of the economy, and it matters a great deal which sector it is that funds the transfers.
Read 7 tweets
30 Sep
1/8
Under the principle that "houses are for living in, not for speculation," according to a meeting held jointly by the PBoC the CBIRC, "housing should never be used as a short-term stimulus for economic growth".

news.cn/english/2021-0…
2/8
This seems to me to be a very clear statement that while in the past property investment has contributed a great deal to economic activity, and thus to China's reported GDP, the regulators do not believe that it has contributed an equivalent amount...
3/8
to China's real economy – or else why distinguish between its short-term stimulative impact and its longer-term impact? This simply reinforces Xi Jinping's recent distinction between "fictional" growth and "genuine" growth.
Read 8 tweets
30 Sep
1/6
“China currently doesn’t need to conduct asset purchases,” Yi Gang, governor of the People’s Bank of China (PBOC), wrote in the September issue of Financial Research on Tuesday.
scmp.com/economy/china-… via @scmpnews
2/6
“Conditions allow this because the country’s potential economic growth potential is expected to stay between 5 and 6 per cent, and the yield curve can be maintained at a normal upward slope.”
3/6
This is an interesting point. I would argue (and so would an increasing number of Chinese and foreign analysts, it seems) that China can only maintain 5-6% growth rates as long as monetary policy accommodates explosive growth in debt.
Read 6 tweets
30 Sep
1/10
Regulators seem to be increasing inspection of the activities of onshore FX traders, according to this article, forcing them to cut back on derivative products, to tighten bid-offer spreads and to reduce trading volume.

reuters.com/world/china/ex…
2/10
As I have long argued, all the over-excited talk about the RMB becoming a major global currency is regularly undermined by regulatory actions aimed at protecting the Chinese economy from the costs and risks associated with major global currencies, and this is...
3/10
perhaps just one more example. Beijing seems especially worried about the vulnerabilities created by the recent opening-up of its financial markets to foreign investors, and is worried that changes in US monetary policies could be disruptive domestically.
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(