John Eastman literally said that Pence should gavel in Trump for a second term as President. 
https://twitter.com/theammind/status/1447553489857662979
Then there would be "howls" from Democrats who, foolishly, might insist that the winner should be President.
Pence then moves it to the House, who also elects Trump.
Pence then moves it to the House, who also elects Trump.
Assuming THIS somehow doesn't work then you just filibuster making Biden President and somehow insist that a bunch of random people who are friends with Republican state reps somehow decide who is President.
So, contrary to the Claremont Institute, Eastman was telling Pence to throw out the results of the election.
The Claremont Institute says that the Federalist Society is now "censoring" John Eastman by not inviting him to speak.
In that vein, would ask that the Claremont Institute stop censoring me and allow me to write a response on their website.
In that vein, would ask that the Claremont Institute stop censoring me and allow me to write a response on their website.
Plus, as George Conway points out, Mike Pence seems to agree with everyone else's analysis. Eastman was asking him to assert unilateral power to decide the election.
https://twitter.com/gtconway3d/status/1447638655925882886
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
