It's always so interesting reading worshipful interviews with Trump. Because he can't really stay on topic, there's a lot of talk about the things he owns and very little in the way of direct quotes.
"We discussed" this. Or he "rattled off" that. But few quotes.
What was in the "detailed" list of irregularities?
What was Trump's excellent advice for how to strengthen the GOP during the midterms? What were the arcane rules he was noting!?
You could have literally just written "he said a bunch of smart stuff."
I especially love the part where Hemingway, anticipating that people will think her interviews suck, says she's just not the sort of interviewer who expects people to answer her questions.
Instead they can just talk to her about whatever and she'll write it up glowingly.
Some weird glossy prose about how rich everyone is, followed by a weird downplaying of the fraud claims. "There's no proof of fraud but there was INTERFERENCE."
Which is to say, people wrote and said mean things about Trump. Which is a KIND of fraud I guess.
The "President's rhetoric" (again no direct quotes) but here, she says "he knows" what happened was unconstitutional, and then says that what happened was "arguably" unconstitutional.
Of course, waiting until after the election to challenge the rules didn't help.
When talking about Ben Sasse criticizing Trump, Hemingway uses some language familiar to anyone who's read the Constitution's treason clause.
You have to love that the man called COVID a hoax and then had this response after his own bout with it.
A classic ending to the piece, in which she provides a small advertisement for how great Mar-a-Lago is and is compensated by a "free" meal.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Some idiot commented on Stefanik's weight under a news story about her. He has like 20 followers.
Rare to see someone so prominent lean into a rando so thoroughly.
People being unfairly shunned has probably always been an issue. But I think we can admit that people aren't really troubled by the concept of shunning so much as people they agree with getting shunned.
A Harvard professor requests to speak to a lawyer. He's interrupted by an FBI agent, who claims he "doesn't play tricks." Then goes to the oldest trick in the book.
A court ruled that this invocation wasn't clear enough. But it sure looks like the officer understood it to be an invocation of the right.
Still, courts don't like suppressing evidence.
Long story short, never talk to the police without a lawyer present. It doesn't work for regular people. It doesn't work for lawyers. It doesn't work for Harvard nanotechnology professors.
Then there would be "howls" from Democrats who, foolishly, might insist that the winner should be President.
Pence then moves it to the House, who also elects Trump.
Assuming THIS somehow doesn't work then you just filibuster making Biden President and somehow insist that a bunch of random people who are friends with Republican state reps somehow decide who is President.
Here's the story of another 15 year old who died while exercising on a hot day. But there's no vaccination angle so obviously no one is going to talk about it.
When I left my job as a Paulding Public Defender, I wrote a post on the defense attorney list-serv looking for a replacement, saying that Dick Donovan, the previous DA, was incompetent and you'd win a bunch of cases.
Turns out he had honorary access to the list-serv. /1
My now former boss was calling and yelling at me to apologize, trying to smooth all this over. It struck me as a bit of an overreaction, but I had to talk to my boss at my new job about it when I joined.
/2
Dick Donovan has since been placed on leave for lying about sexually harassing an employee, requiring a $300,000 payment from the county.