This is, I think, the best discourse I've seen on the whole Bad Art Friend deal. Worth reading if your soul craves discussions on drama rottenindenmark.org/2021/10/10/ide…
I think one other point that I'd make about Kolker's original piece, is that interviewing only friends of one 'side' was just bad journalism. They defend their friend, and all you see is justifications for objectively bad behaviour that they also participated in
I mean, this whole fragment struck me as bizarre. The entire thing is a friend defending her buddy, but the actual context - that her friend wrote an openly bullying story that she then tried to monetize - is just brushed off 
And then this paragraph. In context, this is straightforwardly untrue - the story is demonstrably about Dorland, was used to demean her behind her back, and was edited *just enough* when this came to light
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
