Huge bear market in office RE (adjusted for inflation and covered land plays) coming.

It’s not even arguable otherwise. Let’s move on. We’re done.

What is interesting is the follow on effects!

1/2
- less commuting will hurt non-destinational retail eg “never mind picking that up on the way back from work.”
- what happens to downtown office cores?
- what do we do with these buildings?
- do homes need to be redesigned bigger?

What else? It’s pretty interesting!

2/3
Just so we’re clear, I am not saying no one will go to an office. I am saying a many fewer people will. I don’t know what the percentage is but the fewer people go to the office the less of a benefit you get from going yourself so WFH has a negative network effect.

3/3
Bonus tweet: many companies will switch to 1-2 days a week at the office and by office I mean it will be coworking or something. None of this of course applies to people who manufacture or use machines etc. This applies to the whitecollarbois.

/end

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Molson Hart

Molson Hart Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Molson_Hart

13 Oct
Can a country become sustainably rich without a sizable manufacturing base?

Ways to get rich:

- resource extraction
- tourism
- financial services
- service outsourcing
- software
- manufacturing
- something else I’m missing?

1/n
There’s something special about manufacturing. It taps into all of your human capital. Compare it to tourism. Your people oriented people work the hotels and restaurants. You get a small construction industry, a bit of marketing but that’s it.

2/n
Whereas for manufacturing, your people oriented people do sales, some people can work the plants, you can have designers, managers (yes you get these with tourism too), software, and construction. All your human capital gets tapped.

3/n
Read 6 tweets
8 Oct
The worst experience I've ever had on Twitter!

A lot of people have been asking me what happened, so here's a 🧵of how fucked up Twitter can get, not only for you, but for your family.
It all started at dinner when I decided to calculate the living expenses of someone I know.

I was amazed at how high they were considering how poorly he lived for what he was spending.

I thought to myself, "hmm this is interesting, I'll tweet it."

It went viral.

Most people didn't understand my point (which was not well articulated) and thought that I was suggesting that spending over $1mm/year was not extravagant.

And the guillotines came out.
Read 20 tweets
7 Oct
Economies and diseconomies of scale in management.

0 Employees.

With no one to manage, there is no one with whom to communicate. You will never be more efficient.

1/n
1 employee.

You now must communicate what, how, and why to the employee you manage. Efficiency falls from this communication. However, accountability is high because everything that happens in the department can be attributed to the one person.

2/n
2 employees.

Huge dropoff in efficiency, because, not only do the two employees need to communicate between themselves and you, but you need to know who is responsible for what. You must observe closely to reward fairly or no one will work hard.

3/n
Read 7 tweets
3 Oct
I tweeted about how much it costs to live in Manhattan and in between threats to guillotine me (someone even suggested a wood-chipper!) someone posted an interesting graph from the Fed showing wealth by percentile group.

It's pretty wild.

1/n

federalreserve.gov/releases/z1/da…
1989's Top 1% Share of Wealth: 23.6%
2021: 32.3%

1989's 90-99% Percentile Share of Wealth: 37.3%
2021: 37.7%

1989's 50-90% Percentile Share of Wealth: 35.5%
2021: 27.8%

1989's 0-50% Percentile Share of Wealth: 3.7%
2021: 2.3%

2/n
The most commonly cited solution to this problem is to "tax the rich" but since 1989 we've done that while the wealth share got worse.

Top tax rate went from 28% to 37%.

Not an apples to apples comparison because of inflation but rates also went down for low earners.

3/n
Read 7 tweets
2 Oct
The US consumer good economy in a nutshell right now:

Corporate handouts: EIDL, PPP, ERC, and 2020’s earnings money

VS

Supply chain: rapidly accelerating costs across the board

VS

Consumer savings: UI, stimulus money, child tax credits, and rising wages

What happens?

1/2
Throw a little bullwhip inventory effect, price reflexivity, fomo, human psychology, and tons of debt in there.

And I don’t see how this doesn’t lead to a subprime like economic crisis.

2/2
Bonus: What’s crazy about this is that you also have shortages and government issues like infrastructure and the debt ceiling (did this get fixed?) that I didn’t even mention.

I just don’t see how we get through this without a blow up 🤷‍♂️
Read 4 tweets
1 Oct
Covid lockdowns and supply chain disruptions in Vietnam, as told by e-mails.

E-mail 1: July 8, 2021.

Expected resumption date July 26, 2021

1/n
E-mail 2: July 19, 2021

Expected resumption date: August 2, 2021

2/n
E-mail 3: August 2, 2021

Expected resumption date: August 14, 2021

3/n
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(