There’s something special about manufacturing. It taps into all of your human capital. Compare it to tourism. Your people oriented people work the hotels and restaurants. You get a small construction industry, a bit of marketing but that’s it.
2/n
Whereas for manufacturing, your people oriented people do sales, some people can work the plants, you can have designers, managers (yes you get these with tourism too), software, and construction. All your human capital gets tapped.
3/n
If you have a software nation a lot of your people can’t participate. The guy who assembled chassis at GM has zero place in Facebook.
Further, rapid development in a non-manufacturing field in a country can rob that country of developing a manufacturing industry.
4/n
Baumol’s cost disease, aka you can’t find good managers for your manufacturing plant because they all work at hotels in Phuket, and currency inflows from resource extraction aka Dutch disease make your exports noncompetitive.
5/n
This seems to be what is happening in Thailand (tourism), India (BPO and software), and the Philippines (BPO).
These countries, despite being first rate in their fields can’t tap into their whole human capital base.
Victims of their own success
6/6
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Huge bear market in office RE (adjusted for inflation and covered land plays) coming.
It’s not even arguable otherwise. Let’s move on. We’re done.
What is interesting is the follow on effects!
1/2
- less commuting will hurt non-destinational retail eg “never mind picking that up on the way back from work.”
- what happens to downtown office cores?
- what do we do with these buildings?
- do homes need to be redesigned bigger?
What else? It’s pretty interesting!
2/3
Just so we’re clear, I am not saying no one will go to an office. I am saying a many fewer people will. I don’t know what the percentage is but the fewer people go to the office the less of a benefit you get from going yourself so WFH has a negative network effect.
3/3
Most people didn't understand my point (which was not well articulated) and thought that I was suggesting that spending over $1mm/year was not extravagant.
Economies and diseconomies of scale in management.
0 Employees.
With no one to manage, there is no one with whom to communicate. You will never be more efficient.
1/n
1 employee.
You now must communicate what, how, and why to the employee you manage. Efficiency falls from this communication. However, accountability is high because everything that happens in the department can be attributed to the one person.
2/n
2 employees.
Huge dropoff in efficiency, because, not only do the two employees need to communicate between themselves and you, but you need to know who is responsible for what. You must observe closely to reward fairly or no one will work hard.
I tweeted about how much it costs to live in Manhattan and in between threats to guillotine me (someone even suggested a wood-chipper!) someone posted an interesting graph from the Fed showing wealth by percentile group.
Throw a little bullwhip inventory effect, price reflexivity, fomo, human psychology, and tons of debt in there.
And I don’t see how this doesn’t lead to a subprime like economic crisis.
2/2
Bonus: What’s crazy about this is that you also have shortages and government issues like infrastructure and the debt ceiling (did this get fixed?) that I didn’t even mention.
I just don’t see how we get through this without a blow up 🤷♂️