Hearing many reports of children/adults who've been LFD+ve and PCR -ve for SARS-CoV-2. Given current prevalence the probability of having infection if an LFD test is positive is extremely high - e.g. 97% for adolescents. 🧵

theguardian.com/world/2021/oct…
The calculations above outline the overall positive predictive value (chance of actually having infection if one is positive) at a prevalence of 7% (based on ONS prevalence in secondary school children). This shows that with a positive test, probability of infection is 97%
For groups (e.g. adults) where prevalence is lower (~1%), the positive predictive value (PPV) drops but is still pretty high, at 83%. The exact PPV will depend on prevalence of infection which will differ by region and age group, but is generally high at the current time.
In symptomatic people, or contacts of a case, this probability is even higher with a +ve LFD. It's important to understand that govt policy that those who are LFD+ve & PCR-ve don't need to isolate was based on low prevalence scenarios where positive predictive value was lower.
So please do isolate if you have a +ve LFD & if you can, even if PCR -ve. You are likely to be infected, and be able to transmit to others. +ve LFDs and -ve PCRs can happen for different reasons, including quality of swab, type of swab, technical issues.
The govt should revise it's policy to bring it in line with current prevalence - which makes a policy that asks people with +ve LFDs to go back into work or schools based on -ve PCRs flawed, and likely to worsen spread.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Deepti Gurdasani

Deepti Gurdasani Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @dgurdasani1

14 Oct
We're letting kids down badly. Infection rates in primary and secondary school age children continue to rise, and are the highest across all age groups. Worryingly now there are also rises in all other age groups. Rates >1100/100,000 in 10-19 yr olds & 600/100,000 in 5-9 yrs 🧵 Image
>140,000 10-19 yr olds with *confirmed infection* (likely many more infected) in the past two weeks alone. These kids could've been vaccinated rather than exposed to the risk of long COVID, and serious illness. Image
This should be a scandal but DfE, govt don't seem to care about what is mass infection in children - very clearly related to school opening, and spread from lack of mitigations in schools. Remember that we no longer have contact tracing and quarantine of contacts in schools.
Read 6 tweets
13 Oct
I have to say I'm a bit disappointed by this piece platforming @mugecevik who says:
"Foremost, respect other academicians and scientists"
This is how she's respected me, and other scientists 🧵 Image
This was the thread she said was 'cherry picking' to 'tell any story' and an example of 'how not to do scicomm'. You can decide yourself if that comment was fair or respectful:
She also made baseless allegations against other colleagues, complaining to their employers without any basis- is this respect for other academics?

Read 5 tweets
10 Oct
I recently did an interview where I was asked to give my opinion on recent changes in UK border policy as an expert. After I did this, the two hosts discussed me, suggesting that I was out of touch, & didn't understand that we need to 'accept' risk.
🧵 on 'accepting' risks.
My opinion was clearly out of vogue in the UK, despite being in line with scientific consensus, because the UK has it's own consensus- not based on science. And scientists can either fall in line with it, or be seen as 'alarmists', out of touch with media/public sentiment.
This is a key reason I don't do media anymore. I've realised that when I'm invited for interviews, it's not because people want my expert opinion. It's because they want a fall guy to present as fringe and extreme, to normalise the dystopia that we live in.
Read 19 tweets
2 Oct
Not vaccinating children with vaccines that have been safely given to >14 million children is *not cautious*, when the alternate is infection. This is the real impact of delay- children dying from a preventable illness while waiting to get vaccinated.

thesun.co.uk/news/16308491/…
It's frankly so disappointing to see journalists justifying and rationalising the unjustifiable without challenge. You are also responsible for the impact on children- the preventable deaths, hospitalisations, long COVID, orphaning of children, mass educational disruption.
It might be time to take a long hard look in the mirror and think about how you've been part of the machine that let this happen. To children. Children shouldn't die of illnesses we can prevent. If you can't see that, then you probably shouldn't be reporting on this.
Read 4 tweets
2 Oct
COVID-related myocarditis can be severe and tragically even fatal (unlike vaccine-related myocarditis which is typically rare and mild and hasn't cause any fatalities so far). Children do get seriously ill with COVID- here's a really heartbreaking story.

thesun.co.uk/news/16308491/…
I'm shocked at how long it's taken to decide to vaccinate adolescents & provide them access to vaccines in England. Given the mass infection children are being subjected to due to lack of mitigations in schools, this is urgent. Why isn't the govt taking protecting kids seriously?
These deaths in children are preventable. Why on earth aren't we preventing them? Yes, children don't die as often as adults, but why would we let *any* children die, when protecting them involves such basic measures (vaccines, mitigations) that so many other countries have done?
Read 6 tweets
1 Oct
What is happening with infection in children in Wales? Infection appears to be skyrocketing, with *very large* outbreaks in schools. In the past 3 weeks there have been *131* schools with 20+ COVID-19 cases, and many more with very significant outbreaks. 🧵
Infection rates in school age children are through the roof, and still rising. In adolescents, these seem to have hit 3% *3000/100,000* per week. That's 3% of adolescents & 1.5% of primary school age children being infected *every single week*, and increasing.
It's clear that numbers of identified cases in school age children and staff are higher than they've been during any point in the pandemic, at least since last summer when testing was expanded to everyone.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(