Very thoughtful analysis here on one of the drivers of current natural gas volatility (namely, the increasingly global nature of nat gas markets). A few comments for those who don't want to read the full article.. naturalgasintel.com/lng-growth-sai…
1/ For those who know nothing about natural gas markets other than your monthly bill imagine that you're a cucumber farmer. You can sell cukes for $2/lb at the farmers market in Wheaton or $3/lb at the farmers market in Glen Ellyn. Where do you go?
2/ Not a trick question. Obviously Glen Ellyn. Now imagine that you're a natural gas producer and gas sells for $3/MMBtu at the Henry Hub in Louisiana or $8 at a hub in France. Where would you sell?
3/ Or, if you're not feeling very international, would you rather sell where there is a glut of gas in Louisiana or where there is an excess of demand in Chicago?
4/ The answer is the same as the cucumber farmer, except that for natural gas you can't just throw a couple bushels in your trunk and drive your gas to another market. You need pipelines and (if it's international) liquification stations and ships.
5/ For most of our history, US markets have been largely isolated from other countries, other than a bit of cross border flow into Mexico and Canada. We've also had historically cheap gas relative to European markets.
6/ And so lots of gas producers have (understanably) pushed to build LNG export terminals so that they could access those higher price markets.
7/ As those terminals have been built, markets have done what markets do. Cheaper gas going into higher price market drive down prices in those markets. Tighter supply in markets (like the US) have put upward pressure on price and volatility.
8/ We're still a long way from fully international markets. And there are other factors affecting gas prices as well (less snowpack = lower hydro output is a big one, so climate change is a big driver here).
9/ But important to understand that market players ALWAYS want to sell into higher price markets, and when they succeed the expensive markets get cheaper and the cheaper ones get more expensive. Keep watching this space. /fin

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sean Casten

Sean Casten Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SeanCasten

8 Oct
Good news from today's report is the unemployment rate is down to 4.8%. Bad news is workforce participation is still stuck at 61.6%, and still substantially limited by access to childcare. We fix this with the Build Back Better Act, childcare tax credits and 2 yrs of free pre-K
Three charts to see this. First, total employment. Workforce participation rate highlighted. bls.gov/news.release/e…
Second, same data but only for men of child-producing age. 70% workforce participation and rising. Pretty good!
Read 12 tweets
7 Oct
Safe to say you can count @ewarren and I among the 94% who are confident that climate risk is not fully priced into our equity markets. finance.yahoo.com/news/financial…
50% of all the CO2 we have ever emitted AS A SPECIES has been released since 1991. The rate of change to our climate system is accelerating. This past summer of wildfires and flooding is not the new normal. The rate of change is the new normal.
Markets are bad at pricing in non-linear rates of change for the same reason our brains are bad at non-linear rates of change. Say 2, 4, and our brain instinctively expects 6, not 8.
Read 11 tweets
6 Oct
To my Senate colleagues trying to whittle down the BBB and specifically to weaken the climate provisions. This is the time for leadership. The world needs the US to lead. All eyes are on Congress. If leadership is too hard for you, get out of the way.
1/ When I was in Madrid for COP-25, a European parliamentarian pulled me aside to say "when the US doesn't lead, bad things happen." They need us. We need to go to Glasgow in a position to lead.
2/ Those Europeans knew that Kyoto didn't pass because Bill Clinton couldn't get the US Senate on board.
Read 9 tweets
6 Oct
I'm sorry that the DOJ had to do this, but am pleased they are stepping up to quell the hatred, threatened and in some cases actual violence against our educators and students. nytimes.com/2021/10/05/us/…
As I said last Memorial Day, there is a tension at the heart of representative democracy between those who believe government should represent their interests and those who believe it should represent the interests of the majority, even if at odds with their personal views
Our democracy has survived thanks to the heroes who always defended it. But we have always faced internal threats from those who not only insisted their views must prevail, but resorted to violence when public will moved against them.
Read 6 tweets
5 Oct
This goes to the core of the rot in the elected @GOP. Some are bad people but many simply lack the leadership skills to do right when it matters.

In either case, they cannot be trusted with the responsibility of public office.

Coulda-woulda-shoulda doesn't walk the dog.
Case in point. This is a man who's only skill is securing permission slips prior to action. It is the opposite of leadership.
washingtonpost.com/politics/pence…
Case in point #2. Nikki Haley, a student of the GOP base who will change her position with every puff of wind rather than articulate a coherent and consistent moral base from which she will lead. wsj.com/articles/nikki…
Read 4 tweets
3 Oct
A brief thread to try and demystify the infrastructure convo in Washington, and hopefully correct some misconceptions:
1/ First, the price is not the story. Our House rules require us to pay for any added costs, which we have done. You may object to the substance or object to the way we paid for them, but there is no basis to say "I like $3.5T better than $1.5 or $10.5" in a vacuum.
2/ Also the cost is over 10 years. $3.5T is $350B/year against a ~$5T/yr federal budget and a $20T/yr economy.
Read 21 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(