The issue of Savarkar's "mercy petitions" is so overblown. While Gandhi/Nehru got cushy jails, since they were no real threat, Savarkar got Kaala Paani, hard labor and torture, because he had rattled the Empire
What one writes after years of torture to get out is immaterial.
Meanwhile, there is immense record of Gandhi's active subservience to and collaboration with the British Empire, from his time in South Africa to recruitment of Indians to fight for the British in World War I (and later).
Here he pledges "unconditional service" to the Empire.
In the time period when Savarkar was forming revolutionary societies to fight for complete independence, Gandhi was pledging "unflinching devotion to duty and extreme eagerness to serve our
Sovereign" to "prove Indian Loyalty" to the British.
While "Ahimsa" was preached to prevent any attacks on the British Empire to whom he was loyal, and to undermine the revolutionary movement in India, he was fully in favor of bearing arms in *aid* of the Empire, actively recruiting soldiers for WW I.
His moral gymnastics justified that "serving in the (British) army would develop courageousness in the ordinary Indian"... while undermining Indian revolutionaries who were exhibiting that courage *against* the Empire. Even those who took his "ahimsa" seriously questioned this BS
Even in World War II, India was declared at War by the Viceroy without consulting any Indians. While some in the Congress objected to this, Gandhi and Nehru were the prime collaborators with the British position. And thus rewarded.
"Ahimsa" was not a fraud. It was the best way to aid the Empire. The role was to keep Indians pacified, to completely stop the revolutionary activities which were troubling the British, and to turn Indian suffering into a "high moral principle."
Good article on the relationship and respect that Subhash Chandra Bose had for Savarkar and also Savarkar's influence on Bhagat Singh, who distributed copies of his book and quoted from them.
British Colonial power were not dumb. They knew Gandhi was useful to them and Savarkar a threat:
"those willing to play the game under the devious rules set by the colonists were rewarded for their cooperation and those who tried to scuttle the game were brutally punished..."
"The 'Mahatma' enjoyed his 'rest periods' in jail...in addition to special servants his prison suite consisted of three rooms with a garden... he betrayed the cause of the people by calling off the Civil Disobedience Movement" (using "ahimsa" excuse 🙄).
We are enamored of Western "advancement." But till the 19th century, and even later, the West was very primitive in understanding basic health and hygiene. They didn't "civilize" natives, but vice versa as they copied knowledge from those they colonized.
Most of Europe was a filthy dump, rife with poverty and disease. No wonder their biggest weapon against Native Americans was the diseases they brought from Europe.
It is only after massive transfer of wealth from loot of colonies that get basic civics.
Incas, Aztecs were more advanced than their European conquerors.
"Tenochtitlan was much larger than any European city of its time, and had wide, straight streets, stone aqueducts to bring fresh water from springs and a large, well-organized marketplace."
I'm always amazed at the level of technical proficiency of major government sites in India. This is just using the main "search" box on the Census site.
Bad UI, errors in routine work. India's "English Advantage" in IT gives dividends everywhere.
Meanwhile Chinese programmers, learning in Chinese medium, are hacking into the US government sites, exceeding the US in AI patents.
I doubt the Indian govt even has a way to figure out all its sites that are hacked, let alone hack into others. 😏
Yup, and our assorted "socialists" and communists want the government to keep running airlines and businesses, when they are clearly completely incompetent at even running a website.
Please read my article and then ask yourself why you posit that “Indians are corrupt.”
E.g. if the same question was asked in a Western research context it would be posited as “human beings are corrupt” or “are humans moral”? What is your “other” for Indians? The West? Think.