After at least a DECADE of hysterical front pages, divisive political rhetoric, & polarising clickbait radio & TV discussions about immigration, it speaks volumes that swathes of UK voters STILL don't know what the differences are between refugees, asylum seekers, & migrants. 🤬 Image
I don't think this is satire or a parody account. ImageImage
A REFUGEE is a person who has fled their own country because they are at risk of serious human rights violations & persecution there. The risks to their safety & life were so great that they felt they had no choice but to leave. Refugees have a right to international protection.
An ASYLUM SEEKER is someone fleeing their own country because they are at great risk, but who hasn’t yet been legally recognised as a REFUGEE & is awaiting a decision on their asylum claim. There's no obligation on refugees to seek refuge in the first safe country they come to.
Despite claims, misleading news stories & political rhetoric, those trying to cross the Channel can legitimately claim asylum in the UK if they reach it. Seeking asylum is a human right - everyone should be allowed to enter another country to seek asylum.

fullfact.org/immigration/re…
There is no internationally accepted legal definition of a MIGRANT, but most people, agencies & organisations, understand migrants to be people staying outside their country of origin, who are not asylum-seekers or refugees.
Some MIGRANTS leave their country because they want to work, study or join family. Others leave because of poverty, political unrest, violence, natural disasters etc. Many people don’t fit the legal definition of a REFUGEE but could well be in danger if they went home.
Just because MIGRANTS don't flee persecution, they're still entitled to have all their human rights protected & respected, regardless of the status they have in the country they moved to. Govts must protect migrants from racist & xenophobic violence, exploitation & forced labour.
While there is no universally accepted definition for migrant, the UN defines a migrant as being a person who lacks citizenship in her or his host country.

Migration flows stabilised in 2018 - 2019, & then decreased dramatically in 2020, due to the #COVID19 pandemic.
So which OECD member countries accept the most MIGRANTS – which includes foreign nationals moving to the country as well as those already there on a permanent basis? The most recent data for all OECD member countries is from 2018. Let's compare Britain & Germany.
The UK received 486,452 migrants into the country in 2018, according to OECD data, a 6% decline from levels approved the previous year.

Additionally, the country received 37,365 asylum applications in 2018.
Germany received 1,383,580 new migrants into the country in 2018 - just 438 fewer than in 2017, but a substantial reduction of the more than 2 million new migrants who arrived in Germany in 2015.

The country also received 161,930 applications from individuals seeking asylum.
According to the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), there were 82.4 MILLION forcibly displaced people worldwide at the end of 2020 as a result of persecution, conflict, violence, human rights violations or events seriously disturbing public order.
Of this 82 million displaced people, 48 million
are internally displaced (staying within the borders of their home country), 26.4 million are refugees, & 4.1 million are asylum-seekers.
More than two thirds (68%) of all refugees under UNHCR’s mandate & Venezuelans displaced abroad come from just five countries (as of end-2020).

Syria 6.7 million
Venezuela 4.0 m
Afghanistan 2.6 m
South Sudan 2.2 m
Myanmar 1.1 m
Turkey hosts the largest number of refugees, with nearly 3.7 million people. Colombia is second with 1.7 million, including Venezuelans displaced abroad (as of end-2020).

Turkey 3.7 million
Colombia 1.7 m
Pakistan 1.4 m
Uganda 1.4 m
Germany 1.2 m
(UK 132K)
In the year ending March 2021, the UK received 26,903 asylum applications. In 2020, the highest number of asylum applicants received in the EU+ were received by Germany (122,015) & France (93,475). In the same period, the UK received the 5th largest number of applicants (36,041).
The UK's 36K asylum applications is around 7% of the total asylum applicants in the EU+ & UK, making the UK's the 17th largest intake when measured per head of pop. World-wide  around  85%  of all refugees live in developing regions , not in wealthy industrialised countries.
At the end of 2020 there were  132,349  refugees, 77,245 pending asylum cases  & 4662  stateless persons  in the UK.

The vast majority of refugees – 4 out of 5 – stay in their region of displacement, and consequently are hosted by  developing countries.
There is no such thing as a "bogus asylum-seeker" or an "illegal asylum-seeker".

As an asylum-seeker, a person has entered into a legal process of refugee status determination.

*Everybody* has a right to seek asylum in another country.

unhcr.org/uk/asylum-in-t…
People who don't qualify for protection as refugees will not receive refugee status & may be deported, but just because someone doesn't receive refugee status doesn't mean they are "a bogus asylum-seeker".
The majority of asylum-seekers do not have the right to work in the United Kingdom & so must rely on state support.

Housing is provided, but asylum-seekers cannot choose where it is, and it is often ‘hard to let’ properties which Council tenants do not want to live in.
Cash support is available, currently set at £39.63/person/week, which makes it £5.64 a day for food, sanitation & clothing.

In the year ending March 2021, a total number of 12,967 asylum-seekers or refugees entered the 'detention estate' - 44% fewer than the previous year.
The ‘detention estate’ comprises Immigration Removal Centers (IRC), Short Term Holding Facilities (STHF) & Pre-departure Accommodation (PDA). It excludes those who are detained under Immigration powers in prisons.

gov.uk/government/sta…
In 2020, there were 3,327 enforced returns (& 4,646 voluntary) from the UK - less than half the number than 2019.

Although the number of enforced returns has been declining since the peak in 2012, the sharp fall in the latest year was related to the impact of the pandemic.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with GET A GRIP

GET A GRIP Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @docrussjackson

17 Oct
Obviously it's exclusively the hateful Lefties who are too loose with their 'dangerous rhetoric'. ImageImage
And of course the hateful Leftist "scum media" played its role in amplifying dangerously irresponsible rhetoric too. ImageImageImage
And as for those awful Lefty MPs saying all sorts of terrible things... ImageImageImage
Read 5 tweets
17 Oct
Ages ago I replied to a tweet with some duff info about the Mont Pelerin Society, which I quickly deleted.

This person from the weirdo CATO institute dug up a screenshot of the deleted tweet & tweeted it out - I assume because I'm very critical of the Koch-funded CATO Institute. Image
This is the deleted tweet he's obsessed with - which was, as I say, duff information - & he's now smearing me by making spurious claims about the tweet.

It was seen by just TWO people before it was deleted (not sure what the foreign language is at the bottom). ImageImage
This is the thread that seems to have so rattled him (or perhaps his bosses at the CATO Institute).

The exchange that upset him is at the end.

Read 6 tweets
16 Oct
Stephen Colbert: "Why did you go from acting into politics?"

Glenda Jackson: "Because my country was being destroyed by Margaret Thatcher. Anything that I could have done that was legal to get her & her Govt out of office, I was prepared to have a go at"

"The clincher for me was when she said 'there's no such thing as society', & even though I'd seen my country being destroyed, everything I'd been taught as a child to regard as vices, she told me were virtues: greed wasn't greed it was 'independence'..." Image
"selfishness wasn't selfishness, it was 'taking care of yourself & your family'; & a friend of mine, an artist, came back from the centre of London & said 'London is now a city that Hogarth would recognise' - & he would have recognised it, because..." Image
Read 5 tweets
16 Oct
The Adam Curtis documentary #HyperNormalisation argued that governments, financiers, & technological utopians have, since the 1970s, given up on the complex "real world" & built a simpler "fake world" run by corporations & kept stable by politicians.

theguardian.com/world/2021/oct…
In relation to #COVID19, the UK Govt has been “systematically #normalising” the UK’s current rate of infections.

“They’ve been acting like this is inevitable, seeming relaxed about infections going up".

The UK has suffered twice as many COVID deaths as civilian deaths in WWII. Image
“People often want a generic psychological explanation (for the perceived lack of concern), but we mustn’t ignore the political & ideological context in which this is happening. We’re looking at a phenomenon of #normalisation.” Image
Read 10 tweets
16 Oct
This grotesque far-right account pumps out divisive, inaccurate, deliberately inflammatory anti-"illegal immigrant" bile 24/7, yet I have my suspicions about whether the account holder is who they claim to be, & despite being a "proud patriot", if the account is even based here. ImageImageImageImage
Like many unhinged populist nationalists who subscribe to a far-right ideology, it does a popular line in saying "anti-racists are the most racist" while regularly insulting Greta Thunberg.

And of course it LOVES 'strong men' Xi Jinping, Putin, Modi & Andrew Neil, AND GB "News". ImageImageImageImage
The insidious & disingenuous nature of its tweets follow a rhetorical style you can see here - it's the equivalent of the "I'm not racist but",

It often mocks concern for & trivialises racism, & throws in a lot of 'law & order' rhetoric too.

academic.oup.com/bjc/article/58… ImageImageImageImage
Read 4 tweets
15 Oct
Essex police have just issued a press release declaring "a terrorist incident, with a potential link to Islamist extremism" - @BBCNews
There are hundreds if not thousands of these despicable far-right accounts who have spent the day demonising or blaming Angela Raynor for the death of David Amess.

Police have now confirmed it's 'being treated as a terrorist incident with potential link to Islamist extremism'. ImageImageImageImage
David Amess killing declared a terrorist incident.

Man, 25, in custody as police investigate ‘potential motivation linked to Islamist extremism’.

theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/o… ImageImageImageImage
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(