Share this page!

Maybe Scrolly?
GET A GRIP Profile picture
Twitter logo
17 Oct, 10 tweets, 5 min read
Obviously it's exclusively the hateful Lefties who are too loose with their 'dangerous rhetoric'.
And of course the hateful Leftist "scum media" played its role in amplifying dangerously irresponsible rhetoric too.
And as for those awful Lefty MPs saying all sorts of terrible things...
These awful Lefty MPs really should stop with their dangerously irresponsible rhetoric about bombing & hanging fellow MPs.
I mean, the Right would NEVER say anything inflammatory or provocative, & would certainly never follow the lead of every single grotesque dictator throughout history by mobilising dangerously polarising populist nationalist rhetoric designed to turn citizens against each other...
During year ending March 2020, 1,487 PREVENT referrals (24%) were due to concerns related to Islamist radicalisation & 1,387 (22%) were referred for right-wing radicalisation. The remaining 210 referrals (3%) were related to other types of radicalisation.

theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/n…
In the year ending March 2020, of the 6,287 referrals to Prevent, 3,203 (51%) were for individuals with a mixed, unstable or unclear ideology, of which almost half (1,521; 47%) had no concern identified following an initial assessment.

gov.uk/government/sta…
As Jacob Rees-Mogg said in 2019, about shouts of "NOOSE" & "TRAITORS' GATE" in relation to Jeremy Corbyn from Tory activists during a Boris Johnson speech, the language used by his party was nothing compared to comments made by Labour MPs & supporters. 🧐

huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/tory-jok…
🧐
In 2018, The Sunday Times quoted an unnamed Tory MP: “The moment is coming when the knife gets heated, stuck in her front & twisted. She’ll be dead soon.”

Another said May was entering “the killing zone”, & a third said: “Assassination is in the air.”

huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/backlash…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with GET A GRIP

GET A GRIP Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @docrussjackson

GET A GRIP Profile picture
18 Oct
In 1971, along with Sandy Lieberson, David Puttnam had the audacity to bid for the rights to the book ‘Inside the Third Reich’ by Albert Speer.

Rank outsiders in pursuit of the rights, the publisher agreed that we might at least travel to Heidelberg to make their case in person.
"Albert Speer, Hitler’s former Architect & Armaments Minister had walked out of Spandau prison five years earlier, having served twenty years for war crimes – he patiently listened for several hours as we took him through our reasons for wanting to make the film".
"To our amazement, he agreed that if a movie was to be made, it should be produced by & for a younger generation. That was the start of an adventure which took us and our screenwriter Andrew Birkin on numerous occasions back & forth to Heidelberg."
Read 17 tweets
GET A GRIP Profile picture
18 Oct
Conservatism? Liberalism? Neoliberalism?

It's been argued that neoliberalism originated as much in opposition to fascism as to socialism – a point that Foucault addresses in detail in his analysis of ordoliberalism in his lectures on biopolitics...

journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.11…
'Opposition to fascism did not lead to a uniform view of the role of the state, liberty or sovereignty, & from its inception in the 1920s, neoliberalism has a complex & uneasy relationship with other movements on the political right, in particular conservatism & libertarianism.'
At the Walter Lippmann Colloquium in 1938 – the starting point of European neoliberalism for Foucault – differences were aired that became more significant over time. The majority of those present sided with Hayek in calling for the reinvention of liberalism.
Read 37 tweets
GET A GRIP Profile picture
18 Oct
Dominic Raab looking moody.
Read 5 tweets
GET A GRIP Profile picture
18 Oct
James Weinberg researches the psychological pressures of political life & the problem of violence & intimidation of politicians.

Dog-whistle & aggressive populism, partisan & personalising political news & improved democratic education all play a role.

theconversation.com/david-amess-ki…
Even before the challenging #COVID19 pandemic, a recent Hansard Society audit of political engagement concluded that “opinions of the systems of governing are at their lowest point in the 15-year Audit series – worse now than in the aftermath of the MPs’ expenses scandal”.
In the #GE2017, 56% of surveyed parliamentary candidates expressed concern about abuse & intimidation. Misuse of anonymous social media accounts has intensified these problems & created a toxic environment for MPs that regularly exposes them to online rape & murder threats.
Read 11 tweets
GET A GRIP Profile picture
17 Oct
A #THREAD on polarisation.

Imho, we've arrived at a curious historical juncture, wherein the strategy adopted by either 'side' of *any* issue now follows a familiar format, regardless of what the issue is (I'm NOT claiming "both sides" of a debate have equally valid arguments):
1) delegitimise opposing organisations/beliefs/groups by claiming they're funded by anti-democratic individuals/organisations with a sinister ulterior/ideological motive

2) flood social/print/online media with divisive rhetoric demonising & negatively stereotyping the other side
3) claim supporters of a particular view have been brainwashed/radicalised by sinister anti-democratic forces

4) claim THE TRUTH is being deliberately suppressed

5) claim sections of the media are pushing a grotesquely distorted view

6) exclude non-partisan voices from debate
Read 15 tweets
GET A GRIP Profile picture
17 Oct
Ages ago I replied to a tweet with some duff info about the Mont Pelerin Society, which I quickly deleted.

This person from the weirdo CATO institute dug up a screenshot of the deleted tweet & tweeted it out - I assume because I'm very critical of the Koch-funded CATO Institute.
This is the deleted tweet he's obsessed with - which was, as I say, duff information - & he's now smearing me by making spurious claims about the tweet.

It was seen by just TWO people before it was deleted (not sure what the foreign language is at the bottom).
This is the thread that seems to have so rattled him (or perhaps his bosses at the CATO Institute).

The exchange that upset him is at the end.

Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get emails when @docrussjackson has new unrolls!

Check out other threads from @docrussjackson!

Read all threads by @docrussjackson

:(