I'm a little late to this but it's absolutely hilarious how transparent the Whistleblower/Transparency 'journalists' are in dismissing & attacking any whistleblower who cuts against their narratives (aka does not attack Dems).
OH MY GOD! The (highly-educated) woman who works in tech is a liberal? Well, this changes everything. She is wholly discredited now because....uhh reasons. The only 'correct' type of whistleblowers are the ones who support Donald Trump (unlike me, who does not support Trump).
Wow, someone potentially, maybe might profit from their leaks? Better ignore the substance then. It's important to personalize it.

And btw, Glem is DISGUSTED that anyone might make money off of leaks. He would never think to do such a thing.
So old I remember that 'Julian Assange's motives, including openly cheering for Trump, saying that he was dropping (misleading( docs for maximum impact, to make Clinton lose...all of that is completely irrelevant, as long as the documents are authentic.' That's different b/c....
And they all did the same thing with the Ukraine whistleblower when he came forward to say that the president was using his power to extort an ally. "Not a real whistleblower bc maybe their motive was political and they're not being thrown in jail." Just so transparent.
Finally, will leave you with Glem's rule for whistleblowers. Yet another 'guiding principle' from the world's biggest hypocrite.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Centrism Fan Acct 🔹

Centrism Fan Acct 🔹 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Wilson__Valdez

15 Oct
That was...not a swing.
Absolutely comically bad way to end a great series. Ump-ball, baby.
I mean, that wasn't even close.
Read 5 tweets
13 Oct
It's actually against the constitution for congress to investigate anything that I've already declared I was right about. If anyone tries to own me, that's a violation of my 1st amendment rights.
Imo, the president and his allies organizing a plot to overturn the results of the election are just 'political activities'. Breaking in to the capitol and assaulting police officers? Also merely political activities. No different than say, calling your lawmakers.
Truly one of Glenn's best self-owns in the last couple of days. And a perfect representation of how 'rigorously' Glem researches his arguments. Weeks!
Read 5 tweets
8 Oct
I've eaten relatively healthy these past couple days so...time to reward myself with cheesesteak round 2.
You just know a place called "Gooey Looies" is going to make a good cheesesteak.
I wish I was a little more shameless about filming because the color commentary as I eat this outside is just unbelievable. An old italian south philly man & woman (with the most perfectly stereotypical philly accents) just smoking cigarettes, holding court and opining on life.
Read 4 tweets
8 Oct
Just circling back and, yet again, the 'no coup, nothing to see here, don't be hysterical' anti-anti-Trump GG-Tracey-Taibbi axis just straight up ignored the report. That's just what they do whenever something doesn't fit their narrative. Truly the most cowardly people.
And it's not like all these stories (that they keep burying their heads in the sand and pretending don't exist) are just some one off articles from like Newsweek or something....they don't even have plausible deniability to say, 'oh I didn't see that.'
The other thing is that they used to pretend that their opposition to any 'bad' Trump stories (especially when it came to the Russia stuff) was solely due to 'anonymous sources' but increasingly it's named sources, many under oath and...they still just ignore/disregard them.
Read 4 tweets
3 Oct
This is just sick. I've run out of ways to describe how awful (and full of opinions masquerading as facts) the NYT & the political media has been...but this is just on another level. Utterly deranged.
Anddd she deleted. Can't wait to see that vaunted @nytpolitics social media guidelines in action. Any day now, they will do something. Just pretend she mocked a Republican. You can do it.
Sorry, she failed upwards to @washingtonpost. I regret the error.
Read 8 tweets
1 Oct
Help me make a life-altering decision. What should I do for lunch:
(the falafel would be in a pita, just to clarify)
lol you people are just as indecisive as I am.

Since the poll is within the margin of error, think I'm just gonna make an executive decision and do the hoagie today. Save the falafel for next time. Thanks for the feedback.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(