Thread by @PokerPolitics

I'm seeing a lot of discussion about what exactly "Ron is Q" means and If Ron Watkins is really Q or not and what exactly is the evidence to support Ron being Q so I'm going to make it clear what I mean when I say "Ron is Q".

I've always made it clear that the writer of the QDrops is the least important part of the whole QAnon project. Jim and Ron Watkins ran 8Chan/8Kun which Q declared he had made his exclusive home after leaving 4Chan.

When there was a dispute over which account was the Real Q Account Ron stepped in and verified who Q was. Ron made it clear that he was the one people should trust when it came to the identity of the Q account.

So Ron could take the Q account away from anyone and give it to anyone. Ron could remove a QDrop from the boards if it displeased him. Ron had editorial and publishing control over Q.

Between all this and the fact that Ron broke down and did his whole "Me telling people the hidden truth for years on the chans was just my thing bro...But not as Q. Never as Q. I'm not Q. (Laughing)" but on the HBO documentary makes a clear case about his involvement.

One last thing I'll point out is that while Q was silent about COVID for a long time and QAnon was ranting and raving about it being a White Hat Op that was going to arrest Tom Hanks and Ellen, and also saving the Mole Children. Ron Watkins was saying it was a Chinese Bioweapon.

When Q finally got off his butt to address the issue he strangely went against the QAnon preferred narrative about COVID being a White Hat Op and backed Ron's theory. By this point Q was a cheerleader to the movement so it's odd that he did this.

To me "Ron is Q" is about the fact that he was in control of the message and in control of the forum the message was posted on, and in control of the account. That the writing of the QDrops may or may not have been him is meaningless. A different writer doesn't absolve Ron.

So Ron is Q, I am the walrus and Flores checked his swing. Here's Shirley.