#EACTS2021

This 🧡is related to Thursday's symposium on Edwards' Inspiris Resilia aortic bioprosthetic valve

The hospital in which I work used this valve for ~2yrs before stopping, so I was intrigued to hear the experts

A thought-provoking session!
@rafasadaba @GilbertTangMD
#EACTS2021

First talk from Prof Takkenberg, who needs no introduction to any of you. A very important talk in which she questioned the primacy of RCTs and spoke up on the importance of 'real world' registry data, often dismissed as poor quality
#EACTS2021

I learnt a new acronym today - GOBSAT!
Good Old Boys Sat Around the Table!
i.e. expert consensus, LoE - C! Love it!

She emphasised that a lot of our evidence, esp in VHD, is GOBSAT!

@mirvatalasnag @mrjzacharias
#EACTS2021

Correctly, she highlighted that 1 issue with RCTs is the very selective nature of the patients enrolled - often leading to much better outcomes in trials than we see subsequently in real life - TAVI & SAVR example here

This reduces external validity of the results
#EACTS2021

Other problems highlighted with RCTs were under-representation of women and ethnic minorities - again reducing external validity of results

If data are mostly from Caucasian males in affluent countries...how relevant are the data on a global scale?
#EACTS2021

Concluded by emphasising that RCTs and observational / real world data should be viewed in combination and as complimentary, not as RCTs are the untouchable gold standard that should never be questioned...
#EACTS2021

Next talk from Dr Kocher giving an Austrian single-centre experience of the Inspiris Resilia valve
#EACTS2021

Starts off with an explanation of the valve structure.

Based on the highly successful Perimount valve design, with new features to reduce leaflet calcification & for ring to 'expand' to facilitate future V-in-V TAVI when AVR degenerates
#EACTS2021

This slide is a little over-hyped imho...the valves were explanted after just 8 months...we need a longer timeframe, but I understand the premise - these leaflets are hopefully less prone to calcification
#EACTS2021

INDURE registry data upcoming...
#EACTS2021

Maybe I'm just spoilt by excellent outcomes where I work, but I was worried by these data

30-day mortality 2.6% in a cohort with mean age just 60, and 94pts are <60yrs old? We didn't have STS scores that I saw, but this seemed really high to me

Is that unfair?
#EACTS2021

Final talk in this symposium by Professor Bert Meuris from Leuven. Health economic data...hmmm...let's see!
#EACTS2021

Starts by highlighting that implant rates for mechanical valves in ALL age ranges are falling, including the <60s...that was quite striking to see
#EACTS2021

However, if you put tissue valves into younger patients, you're going to have problems (well, the patients will...)
#EACTS2021

Again, the data (that Prof Meuris' team conducted) showing significantly less leaflet calcium on the Inspiris compared to Perimount valve after 8 months in an animal model...my thoughts on this later...
#EACTS2021

Many registries and small studies conducted

The pitch was very much that these valves may be used in patients that would otherwise receive a mechanical valve - mAVR means more bleeding, tAVR means more re-do procedures
#EACTS2021

Retrospective review of patients that had been allocated to mAVR or tAVR with Inspiris - latter group had shorter stays in ICU & overall in hospital
#EACTS2021

This slide was...interesting

There was NO mention of the cost of the Inspiris Resilia valve itself and how that compares to a mechanical valve...see end of thread for why that matters...
#EACTS2021

These slides were used to illustrate that anticoagulation comes at a price, soemtimes due to low INR needing admission for correction or bleeding complications causing admission and possibly major harm
#EACTS2021

Conclusions here from Prof Meuris
#EACTS2021

So, my thoughts? Well, this was a cleverly crafted session. The constant theme through the talks was to question the primacy of RCTs & showcase the utility of real world data

Now, as it happens, I *agree* that RCTs have major flaws, especially some done recently...
#EACTS2021

Cherrypicking patients to maximise likelihood of a significant difference between two arms is not useful, if the outcomes achieved in an RCT - upon which FDA / CE approvals may be based - simply cannot be recreated in our daily practice
#EACTS2021

However - where I disagreed is what we do about this. The answer is not to embrace retrospective observational studies even more but to improve RCTs! We *have* to demand better of our randomised studies. There's a reason randomised studies are considered best
#EACTS2021

Randomisation evenly & randomy distributes all variables - known & unknown - that could influence outcomes

So, must do better to enrol women, to enrol ethnic minorities & to reduce exclusion criteria...of course, *obvious* reasons trial sponsors may not be keen
#EACTS2021

In our hospital, we stopped using Inspiris Resilia due to cost. These were valve costs to us:

Mechanical AVR - Β£1100
Perimount Magna Ease - Β£1500
Inspiris Resilia - Β£3000
(Sapien 3 TAVI - Β£20,500 - just for info)

So, Inspiris was DOUBLE the cost of Perimount
#EACTS2021

Our surgeons were not very happy. But, on this occasion, I had some sympathy with the managers too. The new valve is DOUBLE the cost of the old valve and there are ZERO data (by definition) *proving* that it lasts longer than the original Perimount Mgane Ease
#EACTS2021

In theory, the valve should last longer & V-in-V TAVI should have better outcomes-but of course no-one knows for sure, as that hasn't happended yet

So, if you work in a wealthy nation without restrictions, I can understand you may opt to pay more for the new valve
#EACTS2021

But, the Perimount Magna Ease is already a very good valve! Most patients get >10 years from it and a decent % get between 13-15 years

Are we saying we think Inspiris Resilia will last significantly longer than that?? I'm not so sure...
#EACTS2021

I'm sure I'm coming across as too cynical. I don't mean to. I applaud Industry for spending R&D funds on improving bioprostheses & Edwards has been a leader in the field

But, it would be nice to have a well-conduced RCT of Inspiris vs mAVR in 50-60yr olds

End! πŸ˜€

β€’ β€’ β€’

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
γ€€

Keep Current with Benoy Shah MD πŸ’™

Benoy Shah MD πŸ’™ Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @dr_benoy_n_shah

15 Oct
#EACTS2021

Good morning everyone!

Spoilt for choice, unsure which session to attend but I am at Controversies in Transcatheter valve treatments

First talk is on TAVI in nonagenarians (>90 yrs old) - is there a survival benefit? by @RoxanneStL

Great and vital question!
#EACTS2021

If someone has already lived far past the average life expectancy in their country and is now into their 90s, can we *promise* the patient that TAVI will make them live longer?

In our centre, we feel that patients >90 need to be very motivated to have a procedure
#EACTS2021

Retrospective study looking at everyone age >90 that had TAVI & then matched them to the Quebec general population that are >90 years
Read 35 tweets
15 Oct
#EACTS2021

This is a 🧡all about Transcatheter Mitral Valve Implantation (TMVI). If you don't know a lot about this and want to learn more - read on! This is a summary of a great expert focus session

First talk from Dr Gry Dahle (Oslo), on why TMVI is not the same as TAVI
#EACTS2021

1st TAVI was done 10 years before 1st TMVI

TAVI has revolutionised treatment of aortic stenosis; TMVI is further behind largely due to anaromical complexity of treating the MV compared to the AV - the AV valves are much more complex than the semilunar valves!
#EACTS2021

Historical timeline of the TMVI journey (left) and the large number of devices still competing for approval in the transcatheter mitral space (right)

@GilbertTangMD @mrjzacharias @BISMICS @SCTSUK @BrHeartValveSoc
Read 25 tweets
14 Oct
#EACTS2021

Abstract session on Hot Topics in Transcatheter Therapies

Presentation from Dr Justin Robinson on use of TAVI in patients with very large aortic annuli - Results from the Michigan TAVI Quality Collaborative
#EACTS2021
Methods here: just over 200 patients with aortic annuli in excess of the normal ranges for both the Edwards Sapien and Medtronic Corevalve systems
#EACTS2021

This was not easy to read. Key data here:

Mean STS score ~5%
Device success ~95%
Pacemaker - 6% Sapien 3 vs 11% Corevalve (p<0.05)
In-hosp mortality ~2%
Read 6 tweets
14 Oct
#EACTS2021
Heart Team - does it still exist?

A very interesting session this morning - a 🧡
#EACTS2021
Dr Alfieri reminded us that medicine has a long history of collaboration between different specialties and areas of science/engineering

He gave the example of Lowell Edwards (engineer) & Albert Starr (surgeon) to create the ball-in-cage valve - same for Bjork-Shiley
#EACTS2021

Why do we have a Heart Team?

Dr Alfieri highlighted this can broadly be divided into these three categories. I really like this...
Read 21 tweets
13 Oct
#EACTS2021

Great first day. My favourite presentation was on the Carmat Total Artificial Heart (C TAH), presented by Professor @netuka_ivan

@rafasadaba
#EACTS2021
The C TAH is probably the world's most advanced total artificial heart & is designed for patients with severe biventricular failure (i.e. for whom an LVAD would be insufficient).

It gained a CE mark last year and has an FDA approval for early feasibility studies
#EACTS2021

The device has an implantable prosthesis and an external power supply to which it is constantly connected
Read 14 tweets
4 Sep
This is a 🧡 about physical examination, and what role it (still) plays in modern clinical practice. Decided to write this after seeing a post earlier this yr by @RichardLehman1 on this issue and some people replying that examination was much less relevant in the modern era
I'd like to share 3 case examples of why I don't believe that is true. POCUS is a valuable *adjunct* to the initial clinical assessment, which includes both history & exam (H&E). The H&E should direct which tests you want & what Q you're asking

1. MR case
2. AS case
3. HF case
Case 1
Pt referred to @UHS_valveclinic with new murmur. Completely asymptomatic, very fit & active. Phys exam revealed a prominent systolic murmur, no other abN findings.

TTE images were hard...here is PLAX

@echo_stepbystep @iamritu @purviparwani @rajdoc2005 @mswami001
Read 23 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(