The Poison of Male Incivility: The degradation and dismissal of women — as disgusting, crazy, infantile, incompetent, irrational, and stupid — has been key to the building and maintenance of disproportionately male power in American political, economic, social, & sexual life 1/4
Powerful men’s “reduction of their would-be female peers — their ideological and electoral adversaries and competitors for power — has helped clear away potential impediment to their own professional trajectories.” 2/4
But this white male opportunism, whether in the form of aggressive insults or simple acceptance of systemic advantages that broad systemic disrespect of others affords them, is rarely examined as the kind of active force that it has always been. 3/4
Men’s use of the (male) ‘gender card’, and their abuses of power, are taken for granted and go unexamined. While women’s reasonable reactions to men’s abuses are painted as disruptive. thecut.com/2020/07/aoc-sp… 4/4
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
What Prime Minister Scott Morrison should tell the men of Australia
“I ask you to join me in acknowledging that – for too long – we have turned a blind eye, a deaf ear, and a cold heart to the unacceptable discrimination, harassment, and violence faced by Australian women." 1/5
“The vast majority of reported sexual assault and sexual harassment is perpetrated by men. Men who may be our dads, brothers, sons, mates, colleagues, and yes, even ourselves.
The responsibility lays squarely with men. With ALL of us.” 2/5
Listening and acknowledging "will not be an easy thing to do. It will be confronting, it will make us feel defensive, even angry.
We should not shy away from that discomfort. Weigh it against the very real trauma, exasperation, and justified anger of women in Australia" 3/5
Violence against women: 6 problems with a focus on telling women how to maximise their own safety. 1) This fails to hold perpetrators accountable for their behaviour, and locates responsibility with the potential victims. 2) Women *already* use a multitude of such strategies. 1/4
3) It accepts that some men will use violence, rather than focusing on how to prevent and reduce this, and places the burden on women to police and limit their lives. 4) The strategies are false assurances. Women may ‘do everything right’ and still be assaulted.
2/4
5) The strategies typically focus on potential assaults on women by unknown men and in public places, whereas most assaults are by men known to the victim (boyfriends, husbands, male acquaintances, etc.) and in familiar locations. 3/4
Sexual violence: It is comforting, but wrong, to think that only a tiny proportion of men ever commit sexual violence. Studies among men on US campuses find that anywhere from e.g. 1.6% in the last year to 25% by the end of 4th year in college have perpetrated sexual violence 1/4
International studies, similarly, find that significant proportions of men, from 2%, to 10%, to 51%, have ever used sexual violence against a woman. This survey (2011) finds that men’s lifetime reported use of SV was around 9% in most countries. icrw.org/publications/e… 2/4
So why do some men perpetrate sexual violence against women? Because of gender socialisation and gender inequalities, in particular. Because of sexual entitlement and gender-inequitable social norms. Authoritative review of scholarship on perpetration: xyonline.net/sites/xyonline… 3/4
If feminist attention to men is to make a real contribution to progressive social change, 3 conditions must be met. Michael Flood on the ‘turn to men’ in gender politics and its implications. In full here: xyonline.net/content/turn-m… 1/7
1) Our vision of the problem and the solution must be much more robustly feminist. Squarely focused on the structural, material, and institutional dimensions of gender inequality, how men and masculinities are implicated in these, and thus the need for their transformation. 2/7
Efforts focused on men should involve a much more substantial call to action. They should set the bar high. They should expect that men will strive for gender-egalitarian identities, practices, and interpersonal relations and contribute to community action. 3/7
Young men who agree more strongly with rigid masculine norms are more likely to: perpetrate violence and harassment, have thoughts of suicide, drink at risky levels, be involved in traffic accidents. Report and fact sheets at jss.org.au/what-we-do/the…@JesuitSocialSer@VicHealth
Among men, belief in rigid masculine norms is 20 times more important than demographic variables in predicting the use of violence, 15 x more influential in predicting binge drinking, and 10 x more influential on negative mood. jss.org.au/what-we-do/the…@VicHealth@JesuitSocialSer
The impact of conformity to traditional masculine norms on outcomes: depends in part on *which* norm, and *which* outcome. See my commentary on the ‘Man Box’ survey findings, pp. 40-43 of the report here: jss.org.au/what-we-do/the…@VicHealth@JesuitSocialSer
A woman who is a domestic violence victim may stay in or return to the relationship with the violent man, for *understandable* reasons. Fear of what he will do if she tries to leave. Loves him. Wants the relationship, but not the violence. Hope that he’ll change. 1/5
For the sake of the children. Financial dependency. Social isolation. Blames herself. Feels powerless. Pressure from others. No means to survive if the relationship ends. Fears of homelessness and poverty. Etc. 2/5
Note that many of these represent the impacts of *the partner’s violence and control*. He may have threatened to harm her, relatives, or the children, pets or property, or to kill himself, if she leaves. Tried to make her feel stupid, hopeless, and responsible for the abuse. 3/5