@arambaut @BioSRP @bmj_latest @BallouxFrancois @Ayjchan One fault in the argument, @arambaut:
You are assuming that the mine workers were infected with RaTG13.

All we know is that
1. They tested IgG+ to some SARS like BatCoV and had symptoms very similar to COVID-19

2. RaTG13 (then BatCov4991) was sampled from that Mine in 2013
@arambaut @BioSRP @bmj_latest @BallouxFrancois @Ayjchan Now as you know, there would likely have been a mosaic of BatCoVs somehow similar to RaTG13 in that mine in 2012.
It’s not because we only know of RaTG13 that it’s all there was.

From there the Mojiang Passage Theory can make sense.
@arambaut @BioSRP @bmj_latest @BallouxFrancois @Ayjchan What we would need is much more sampling of that mine, at different times of the year too.

But there is not much available - and access is restricted. So this is not going to happen soon.
@arambaut @BioSRP @bmj_latest @BallouxFrancois @Ayjchan Another possibility is to retest the sera of the miners.

But all that we got is some rather odd back-pedalling from the WIV, explaining that the samples never tested positive against all evidences and the theses unearthed by DRASTIC.
Great.
@arambaut @BioSRP @bmj_latest @BallouxFrancois @Ayjchan Personally I would suspect that you are more likely to find a backbone closer to SARS-CoV-2 somewhere else in south Yunnan or north Laos.

RaTG13 obfuscation may point to the fact that the WIV sequenced it in 2018 after calling it ‘boring’, because they were already working…
@arambaut @BioSRP @bmj_latest @BallouxFrancois @Ayjchan on implementing the first steps of DEFUSE, especially the one that explicitly calls for the revisiting of positive sera from Yunnan.

"Subtask 6.4 Test previously-collected human sera from Yunnan Province to assess SARSr-CoV QS spillover (WIV)."
@arambaut @BioSRP @bmj_latest @BallouxFrancois @Ayjchan In all, between the two EHA papers of 2017 and 2018 they only identified 15 positive cases in close to 1,800 people at risk (2.7% and 0.6%) and all these 15 were subclinical.

So clearly the logical thing was to go back to the sera of the miners, 3 of which had died.
@arambaut @BioSRP @bmj_latest @BallouxFrancois @Ayjchan Which is why they suddenly sequenced ‘boring’ RaTG13 back in 2018.

Something that the WIV would be very keen to hide because it opens the DEFUSE can of worms, and the backbone question.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Gilles Demaneuf

Gilles Demaneuf Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @gdemaneuf

19 Oct
Oh Marion, what would we do without you?

You had a good time calling the research-related hypothesis 'Debunked' at the KNAW-symposium in Dec 20.

Alongside meteorite (!), snakes and some other flotsam.
You had been working for a while with your the Chinese side of the WHO-Team (remote work started around Oct-Nov 20) and you were already pretty clear on your convictions.

You made the same claims in June 21, adding that there was no point going further:
You were also very dismissive of any criticism, and fully in line on this with a now very compromised Peter Daszak, who at the time was hiding DEFUSE:
Read 10 tweets
18 Oct
Important insights.

Jeffrey Sachs basically had to get rid of Daszak and anybody linked to him after he refused to disclose to him the WIV grants he was involved with.

Jeffrey had to learn about them via FOIA'd documents and via the DEFUSE leak. Very unpleasant experience.
“I said there was no way he could be task force chair or on the commission if he didn’t share those.”
"The other 11 people on the task force refused to remove Daszak from their ranks, but agreed to make Keusch their chair instead."

So basically he first asked Daszak to step down from any work on the origins and keep working on the epidemiology side first.
Read 7 tweets
17 Oct
Take the same compromised people, add a few more, find a biosafety expert that lauds the excellent biosafety of Chinese labs and decries ‘typical conspiracy theories’, sugar coat it with a few neutral names and you have a SAGO cake. dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1…
A cake with a near null dose of honest biosafety expertise (1 in 26), but a fat dose of EcoHealth devotees with a fully formed and reliable opinion as to the necessary zoonotic origins of COVID-19.

Here are Fisher and Koopmans (both in SAGO) having a good laugh at critics.
Watch the video - it's edifying.
Read 13 tweets
16 Oct
@kcz100 @MonaRahalkar @thackerpd @amymaxmen @alisonannyoung @Ayjchan @R_H_Ebright @FilippaLentzos Kathrin Summermatter, about a possible research-related accident:

“I consider this very unrealistic, a classic conspiracy theory.”

“Ich erachte das als sehr unrealistisch, eine klassische Verschwörungstheorie.”

headtopics-com.translate.goog/ch/stammt-das-…
@kcz100 @MonaRahalkar @thackerpd @amymaxmen @alisonannyoung @Ayjchan @R_H_Ebright @FilippaLentzos Kathrin:

“China has had a very high level of high security laboratories for over ten years. They have frequent inspections and very strict safety standards.”
@kcz100 @MonaRahalkar @thackerpd @amymaxmen @alisonannyoung @Ayjchan @R_H_Ebright @FilippaLentzos “During the Sars epidemic in 2004, employees were infected outside a laboratory. As a result, the biosecurity of laboratories in China has been greatly improved.”

Well, at least we know where Kathrin stands.
Great addition to the SAGO team, no doubt.
Read 12 tweets
15 Oct
It is amazing to see how the NY Times and no less than Nature have been distorting the significance of the BANAL BatCovs found in Laos.
@carlzimmer @SmritiMallapaty
nytimes.com/2021/10/14/sci…
Both articles have left the scientific domain for the opinions one - if not the political opinions one - by asserting that the Laos BANAL BatCoV finds reinforce the zoonotic origin hypothesis.
nature.com/articles/d4158…
Now let's cut through the noise and go back to the horse mouth, Marc Eloit the main author of that paper - from the Institut Pasteur.

On the key issue of the absence of the not-banal-at-all FCS in all the BANAL BatCoVs:
"It is possible that it was acquired in a lab"
@Ayjchan
Read 15 tweets
15 Oct
Another good article by ⁦@ParkSuAm1996⁩ and ⁦@simonelmc

Science turns nasty in Covid-19 origins argument on Twitter | South China Morning Post archive.is/2021.10.14-234…
Jesse Bloom:
“I no longer think it’s a conspiracy theory that the furin cleavage site could have been engineered,”

He also added that he was “stunned” to see the DARPA proposal and questioned why the scientists involved didn’t come forward to disclose it earlier.
Holmes said that it was “staggeringly inept” for Peter Daszak, the head of EcoHealth Alliance, and the scientists involved in the DARPA application to not have made it public “when everyone is looking for transparency”
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(