Thread by @DavidLat

1/ THREAD. @AaronSibarium of the @FreeBeacon, who last week broke the story of the Yale Law School email controversy, has this must-read follow-up about how the YLS community is responding.

bit.ly/3C6T5M8

2/ Two Yale Law School professors expressed displeasure with the initial statement released by YLS.

One of them is renowned corporate law scholar Roberta Romano (who Yale Law students and alums know is a badass—and I mean that as high praise):

3/ I tweeted some positive things yesterday about Marina Edwards's message, which seemed to sound some conciliatory notes.

Please see the new additions to the thread below. I've retracted those earlier comments of mine.

https://twitter.com/DavidLat/status/1449863290331541508

4/ The two student-group messages that followed Edwards's message, included in @aaronsibarium's latest article, suggest that the offended students, rather than entering into a new, more constructive phase, are doubling down and digging in.

5/ Over the years, many admitted students have asked me for advice about where to matriculate for law school.

When Yale Law was on the table, I almost always said "go to Yale"—as a loyal YLS alum, but also because I genuinely believed it.

6/ I still believe Yale Law is a great institution.

Those of us who have expressed concerns in recent days about recent events at YLS want it to be the best version of itself.

We believe things can get better. We wouldn't bother speaking out otherwise.

7/ But if a conservative or libertarian law student asked me if they should go to Yale Law today—over some other top law school, especially one giving them scholarship money—I would have to think long and hard about my answer.

8/ I fear that the intellectual environment at Yale Law School right now is extremely hostile to conservatives.

Again, just read the student-group messages in @aaronsibarium's article.

9/ And, at least if recent events are any indication, administrators at Yale Law School—or at least the two involved in the attempted reeducation of Trent Colbert—are not being honest brokers. Instead, they take sides.

10/ Dean Heather Gerken is far better than the two administrators who dealt with Trent Colbert. I've had only positive interactions with her. She has always been willing to listen and have a dialogue.

But I have a quibble with her message from today:

11/ The message Dean Gerken should have sent at this fraught time should have been scrupulously neutral—above suspicion, like Caesar's wife (can I still say that these days?).

But paragraph 3 reads like a passive-aggressive dig at critics:

12/ Go back to the third paragraph. Imagine how much better it would have read WITHOUT that second sentence (beginning "I will not").

Read it again, without that sentence. That would have been the neutral message we needed from Dean Gerken at this time.

13/ One thing I should mention again about myself.

As I said in the post below, "My own views have drifted leftward over the years, so I'm not sure I would still consider myself a conservative or a libertarian."

bit.ly/3DKcWl4

14/ So my concern for free speech doesn't flow from a desire to help my own political team, since I'm no longer a conservative or a libertarian, and I'm certainly not a Republican.

But I don't think such folks are evil or should be shouted down.

15/ I should add that I also don't think the offended students are evil either.

I might disagree with them vehemently, but I don't think they're evil. Nor would I deny them the right to state their views.

16/ I don't know where this will all lead. I hope it will lead to a better place.

But I now fear, contrary to my more optimistic assessment from yesterday, that student tension & the climate for free speech at Yale Law will get worse before they get better.