1/ Jeremy Rosen, a prominent (conservative) appellate lawyer, has this excellent piece in @TheAtlantic about John Eastman, the closest thing to a "brain trust" for Trump's attempt to overturn the 2020 presidential election.
bit.ly/3pjKq5w
bit.ly/3pjKq5w
2/ Jeremy Rosen acknowledges—and criticizes—the attempts of some groups to "to silence anyone who thinks differently from them."
As he notes, these threats to free speech come from both the left AND the right—and deserve condemnation in both cases.
As he notes, these threats to free speech come from both the left AND the right—and deserve condemnation in both cases.
3/ Here is Jeremy Rosen's bottom line on John Eastman (with which I agree): 
4/ Here is John Eastman's own account of his supposed "cancellation."
Note that @FedSoc didn't revoke his membership or even his leadership role (which many folks called for).
bit.ly/3lXlEpJ
Note that @FedSoc didn't revoke his membership or even his leadership role (which many folks called for).
bit.ly/3lXlEpJ
5/ In a nutshell, John Eastman wasn't picked to be a speaker at certain @FedSoc events—which happens all the time, for all sorts of reasons.
And some members spoke critically about him at Society events—as is their right.
And some members spoke critically about him at Society events—as is their right.
6/ If you haven't done so already, read Jeremy Rosen's full piece over at @TheAtlantic, which @ElectionLawBlog accurately describes as a "must-read."
bit.ly/3B3VExk
bit.ly/3B3VExk
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
