Here is Chris Huhne of the 'greenest government ever', announcing the Green Deal, promising 'the most ambitious blah blah blah... ever'.
As far as governments and political parties are concerned, the green agenda is extremely "flashy".
They believe, because they are surrounded by blobs, that the public are mad keen for it.
But they are disconnected from the public who do not share their green vision.
Into the bubble, and away from the public are the commenters who have drunk even more of the Kool Aid, and who have totally failed to scrutinise any aspect of the green agenda whatsoever.
That's you, that is, Dunt.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Climate Assembly was an attempt to overcome the public's lack of interest in the climate agenda -- to manufacture a mandate for #NetZero, as I explain here.
Climate technocrats and fake academics had to force the Assembly into making decisions, and to then torture the data from their votes, to make it look like the Assembly had agreed with them, as I show in the report and here.
Lots of terrible coverage for the government's #NetZero agenda, even from allies. A growing gulf between realists and zealots. I wonder how long it can survive in its present form, even assuming success at #FLOP26.
Britain could emerge from the global jawfest as a "climate champion", but then be one of the first countries forced to pull out of the very deal it brokered, because of domestic political pressure.
There is precedent.
Within months of the 2017 COP23 at Bonn, Germany was revealed to have missed its own green targets.
And within a couple of years of the 2015 COP21 in Paris, rising energy prices sparked a protest movement demanding Macron's resignation in weekly protests.
It's an even less plausible figure, which only serves to demonstrate the imposition of toxic political orthodoxy over free and unfettered scientific investigation and debate, not a meaningful scientific consensus.