Why would the green-biased media be the ones making the issue out of the story?
What's the relevance of a daft study (probably from CAST, or some other such outfit) being removed from a government website be significant?
Where's the outrage?
What's the relevance of a daft study (probably from CAST, or some other such outfit) being removed from a government website be significant?
Where's the outrage?
Turns out it was actually written by the Behavioural Insights Team themselves.
Having a quick scan, it does seem to have been removed because it's a total liability for the government's agenda.
Which is ironic, isn't it, for BIT...
Having a quick scan, it does seem to have been removed because it's a total liability for the government's agenda.
Which is ironic, isn't it, for BIT...
No wonder they deleted it. It's crass.
They get paid a fortune to produce this guffage.
They get paid a fortune to produce this guffage.
the Been and Graun seem to be upset, because they love the BITs bitches.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
