2/ Using the outside view requires finding and applying an appropriate reference class, or base rate. The more businesses you learn about, the more you improve your probability distribution of outcomes.
Goal: Find a gap between what is priced into a stock and likely reality.
3/ Example: Assume SaaS company X reveals only partial data about unit economics. X provides no data to investors on churn or CAC. An investor with the right reference class (data about similar businesses) will be more able to spot a mis-priced opportunity. Pattern recognition!
4/ A venture capitalist who has seen the unit economics of many businesses acquires pattern recognition skill that helps them understand an investment they are evaluating. Base rates inform them about the probability of success. They can do sensitivity analysis on key factors.
5/ A founder of a business can use pattern recognition developed via base rates to make judgements about where to devote time and attention to improving unit economics. For example, they'll know from the data the benefits of greater retention (lower churn) can be non linear.
6/ A manager inside a business (eg Netflix) knows exactly what customer churn is and can break it down by cohorts. Investors don't always have the data. Investors with pattern recognition via base rates are better positioned to identify gaps been current price and actual value.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ "You sometimes hear an entrepreneur say: ‘Oh, we’ll just make it viral.’ As if virality is something you can choose to add in after the product is baked – like a spell checker. If virality was easy, there would be no advertising industry.” Josh Kopelman.
2/ "Virality is something that has to be engineered from the beginning…and it’s harder to create virality than it is to create a good product. That’s why we often see good products with poor virality, and poor products with good virality." Josh Kopelman.
3/ "Most viral acquisition is built around incentives. Users are incentivized either explicitly (with a clear dangling carrot) or implicitly (through product mechanics) to invite other users.” Sangeet Paul Choudary.
2/ Existing existing missile defense systems can’t stop all incoming missiles with nuclear payloads possessed by China, Russia or the US even now.
Low earth orbit satellites with sensors in polar orbit are the new early warning systems for a: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractiona…
3. "Will you be disappointed if the nuclear missiles don’t come from the North Pole, like Santa? The US with more than a thousand nuclear weapons, will avenge your family either way. However, it’s crazy to base U.S. security on the threat of mutual annihilation forever."
1/ Simba: "Why isn't the 'sit on you ass' investing style not more popular?"
Mufasa: "Because it is hard for anyone to earn management fees on a portfolio of less then ten stocks that rarely changes. As I said before, if you show me the incentives, I will show you the outcome.
2/ Simba: "Is sit on your ass investing the only way to invest successfully?
Mufasa: "No. My standard prescription for the know-nothing investor with a long-term time horizon is a low fee index fund. Less than 10% of stock market investors can beat an index after fees."
3/ Simba: "Index fund investors seem to have more free time to do things like going on hikes and playing golf."
Mufasa: "Of course they do. But they are not earning investment management fees while they are playing golf, like active managers that closet index their portfolios.
1/ Trillions is a new book by Robin Wigglesworth. The book's core is a lively telling of the creation story of index funds. The author skillfully uses the contributions of colorful individuals to inform the reader about the investing system's origins. amazon.com/Trillions-Rene…
2/ Wigglesworth’s narrative describes the contributions of the people and organizations who invented, developed and promoted the index fund phenomenon. I found the book's discussion of the motivations and contributions of John Bogle and Vanguard insightful and interesting.
3/ After I read a review copy of a book I inevitably ask myself whether I would have purchased the book. In the case of Zillions, my answer is definitely yes. If you are unsure about this, I encourage you to listen to Wigglesworth describe his book in a podcast. It is worthwhile.
1/ A highly maneuverable weapons delivery system (i.e., a missile) moving at hypersonic speed from a polar low earth orbit can be countered by a global system of thousands of sensors also operating a low earth orbit that can direct anti-missile systems. google.com/amp/s/amp.ft.c…
2/ The assertion by FT that hypersonic weapons development is something that US and other nations have not been aware of isn't remotely credible. The people who actually do understand hypersonic weapons can't talk about them, because that is the nature of a security clearance.
3/ That a person is being quoted in a well-known publication doesn't mean they understand what they are talking about. This story about hypersonic weapons is just one example. By thinking independently you have an opportunity to avoid the Murray Gell-Mann amnesia effect.
1/ Simba: "Investing based on ratios like P/E isn't working."
Mufasa: "That's because stock prices reflect transactions between investors selling the present value of future flows they expect a business to produce and buyers who expect even higher future cash flows."
2/ Simba: "Looking up ratios on a web site is easy. Doing a Price-Implied Expectations Analysis requires some work."
Mufasa: "Do you want to use an investing system that is easy or do you want the PIE system that actually works? Use the on-line tutorial." expectationsinvesting.com/online-tutoria…
3/ Simba: "Can't I just invest in great businesses?
Mufasa: "You can't earn superior returns on stocks that are priced to fully reflect future performance. Picking stocks is searching for mistakes What revisions doesn't the seller understand? To start, know what they expect."