Today’s House Rules committee met to further proceed on the recommendation of the @January6thCmte to refer Steve Bannon for criminal contempt of Congress. @BennieGThompson and @RepLizCheney both testified about democracy and accountability. But then🧵👇🏻
Sheriff shoot-n-holler and the Animated Sugar Daddy both came in to testify. That’s the unjacketed Jim Jordan and Ice cream enthusiast Matt Gaetz respectively. It was wild, you should really watch the whole thing. But what caught my ear was Gaetz using Steve Bannon’s words.
Gaetz said to ‘catch the signal, and not the noise.’ Ok, then. What did Gaetz and Jordan ‘signal’ today? Well, Jordan argued that the 600 people being prosecuted for the Jan 6 Insurrection are being investigated by the executive branch. That’s where investigations should be.
The implication too is that is where it should end. He literally just threw the trump voters under the bus. He’s signaling the DOJ has everyone involved, look no further. Certainly don’t look at me. Congress has no right to do investigations.
Benghazi Jim Jordan may wish to have a word with January 6th Jim Jordan.
Jordan also ‘signaled’ that he spoke with trump *during* the Insurrection. Remember when Jordan was asked if he had spoken to trump and said uh, well, uh, hummuna, hummuna, I speak with him all the time, I don’t remember.
Chairman of the House Rules committee McGovern deftly asked Jordan if he had spoken with trump before, during or after the insurrection. Jordan then said he spoke with him while we were in the safe room.
Now, the reason Jordan was in the safe room was what? THE INSURRECTION!
McGovern also brilliantly set the stage for what is to come. McGovern asked Jordan and Gaetz if *they* would answer questions of the @January6thCmte. Jordan replied I have nothing to hide. We’ll see.
The ‘signal’, that McGovern sent resonated loud and clear. The @January6thCmte *will* be requesting information from Members of Congress. This ‘signal’ is further amplified by the mere presence of Jordan and Gaetz in the House Rules meeting. They aren’t House Rules members.
They are what you might call, getting ahead of the news cycle. Gaetz went as far as to throw Kevin McCarthy under the bus. Gaetz used his name more than once when talking about information requests. Jordan referenced ‘big tech’ & ‘carriers’ because they complied with subpoenas.
Another ‘signal’ from Gaetz is his ardent defense of McCarthy saying the @January6thCmte is only looking to criminalize the process and set up criminal cases against political opponents. Now, why would he be so worried about criminal prosecutions of Members of Congress?
If we’re looking for ‘signals’ and not noise, then the signals are signaling more subpoenas to come, Jordan’s name may be included, Gaetz name may be included, Kevin McCarthy’s name may be included. Further criminal prosecutions may occur. @January6thCmte is on track.
END
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This Oleg Deripaska news is a BFD. Take a huge step back and realize what it means when the FBI performs a ‘law enforcement activity’ at 2 separate locations owned by the same individual. A wee thread for perspective 🧵👇🏻 nbcnews.com/politics/justi…
Todays FBI ‘activity’ had to have been a coordinated effort. The field offices would have been in communication, planning, sharing information. They would have had to have some probable cause for this to have occurred. They would have also needed permission, perhaps warrants.
On October 10, 2020 there was a ‘Patriot Muster’ rally put on by a group called United American Defense Force. The rally was in Denver, CO. The UADF was led by a former Benghazi security contractor named John Tiegen. You’re gonna wanna read this one.🧵👇🏻
You may recall during 2020 there were many protests. The George Floyd protests took place over the summer. Armed men dressed in battle fatigues were patrolling gas stations in Kentucky. Armed men dressed in battle fatigues stormed various State Houses.
As a matter of fact 2020 was so nuts, just 2 days before the UADF’s Patriot Muster in Colorado, the FBI released a statement about a plot to kidnap The Governor of Michigan. Crazy, right? Like, super nuts.
Wow…have you read the testimony of Acting Attorney General Jeffrey Rosen? The link is below. The thread attempts to provide context and highlights what I found to be of some importance. Wow…just…wow. 🧵👇🏻 judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/…
Chuck Grassley, the Senate Pro Tempore who was poised to step in if Pence didn’t certify the election as per Point 1 in the Eastman Memo, defense of trump is that trump ‘listened to his advisors and didn’t replace Rosen with Clark for not sending the Clark letter so no harm.’📌1
While true-ish it also completely negates the fact that there *was* a Clark letter to begin with. Yes, there was a meeting in the Oval in which 6 of the 7 lawyers present thought the Jeffrey Clark scheme was a bad one. The 7th lawyer was Clark.
The Subverting Justice report released by the Senate Judiciary Committee shows a scheme by former president trump to use the Department of Justice 🗣 to OVERTURN THE 2020 ELECTION. It reveals a lot more than that if we care to look. Here is a wee meaningless thread🧵👇🏻
Some may argue the first impeachment of trump for his quid pro quo with Ukraine on a not perfect phone call was meaningless because the Senate had no intention of convicting their golden goose that laid federal judges and tax breaks for donors.
Some may say that impeaching trump for a second time for inciting an Insurrection was meaningless. He was out of office during the Senate trial. Ted Cruz, a sitting juror in the impeachment, was seen providing aid to trump’s lawyers. It was a sham.
We absolutely cannot allow the media to do to this Senate Judiciary Committee Report on trump’s Pressuring the DOJ to OVERTURN THE ELECTION, what they did to the Mueller report and Volume 5. These things are all connected and the context matters. 🧵👇🏻
The pieces are coming together. Jeffrey Bossert Clark (not in a position of leadership at DOJ) was making a proposal to the President of the United States, without the knowledge of his bosses, to send a letter to ‘relevant’ states 🗣to aid him in OVERTURNING THE ELECTION!!
The letter was not signed by then Acting Attorney General Jeffrey Rosen so it was never sent to the states. The scheme was for the DOJ to tell the states they thought there were irregularities that should be reviewed. Just because they felt like there might have been fraud.
Sen Kyrsten Sinema’s objectively hypocritical approach seems very Republicany. Why? When she was shoulder to shoulder with John Cornyn, I began to worry she was a plant so I took a wee look.
Sinema was the lead sponsor of a bill called S1967, the “Childcare Expansion for Military Families Act of 2021”. Her bill provides construction of child development centers. But she won’t support the Build Back Better Act which provides universal pre-k and other child provisions?
Sec 3 of Sinema’s Bill reads: ‘Education and Infant And Early Childhood Mental Health Consultation Services for Infant and Early Childhood Mental Health’, but she doesn’t support the Build Back Better Act that would expand healthcare to children?