one of the reasons we should care about police, prosecutors, and judges is that they are the way people who own things enforce the inequalities and injustices of our society against people's bodies.
police, prosecutors, and judges are the ones who remove your family from your home if you can't pay the landlord or the bank.
police, prosecutors, and judges are the ones who cage you if you take the insulin medication your child needs but that you can't afford.
police, prosecutors, and judges are the ones who deport you if you cross an imaginary political boundary created through imperial conquest, in search of a better life and to flee right-wing paramilitary groups trained and armed by U.S. military.
so, it's very important how these bureaucracies function, to whom they are accountable, how much power and discretion and money they have, and what surveillance technology and weaponry we give them.
in other words, the threat of imminent violence against people's bodies is how many of the injustices and inequalities in our society can exist. i try to explain it in detail, with hundreds of examples, here: yalelawjournal.org/forum/the-puni…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Thread. The copaganda crisis is now causing a scandal at the Associated Press. This @ap article on Portland police is one of the single worst examples of media reporting on police I've ever seen. I explain below why it's so dangerous. abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/l…
The thesis of the article is that police are powerless to stop Portland from becoming "lawless" because of a relatively toothless law that restricts use of rubber bullets and chemical irritants. (The history of police violence and criminality that led to it are not mentioned.)
1st, note that the article is basically a police union press release. It takes a pet issue of the union and local real estate developers and is full of false claims (repeated without skepticism).
Thread. The idea that "defund the police" is a "failed slogan" is one of the silliest things you see a lot of in the media today. If you hear people saying it, here are some thoughts on how to respond:
First, the idea that a social movement is a "failure" a few months after it first appears is odd. People like this would have declared the anti-slavery movement a "failure" in 1850, and would have said that women's suffrage, same-sex marriage, climate change, etc... all "failed."
Second, "defund the police" isn't a "slogan." It is a demand that people harmed by police violence make to get people to see that unprecedented U.S. spending on cops, weapons, and cages could be reduced and investment in arts, housing, schools, healthcare, wages, etc.. increased.
Thread. This week, the New York Times's recent dangerous reporting on "crime" reached a new low. I try to document what happened carefully below, because what happens to the leading newspaper in the U.S. has effects on how we all get information about the world.
The NYT just published an article blaming nationwide corporate consolidation at Walgreens on a supposed wave of shoplifting by the poor in San Francisco. nytimes.com/2021/10/13/us/…
As you read, ask yourself: who determined that this Walgreens press release blaming shoplifters for corporate consolidation should be a NYT story, and why did they chose to tell the story the way they did?
THREAD: In January, I argued a case before the California Supreme Court. The question was: is it illegal in the United States for a human being to be caged and separated from their family prior to trial solely because they lack cash, even though they are presumed innocent?
Think about how easy this legal question should be. It is easy for people like my grandmother--she got to listen to the oral argument online and immediately thought we won the case because she believes that it's wrong to put someone in a cage because they are poor.
And yet, wealth-based human caging is so normalized (and beneficial) for prosecutors, judges, and wealthy bureaucratic interests that our civilization is still pretending to argue about this issue in its highest courts as if it's a serious intellectual question.
Thread. This story of rampant physical and sexual attacks against children inside Texas's prisons for children is not an isolated incident of "bad guards." This is what child cages look like in every state. We must draw a few lessons: nytimes.com/2021/10/15/us/…
First, this is what Texas's child prisons look like decades after so called "reform." When the purpose and function of a bureaucracy is control, domination, punishment, violence, discipline, submission, and crushing the human spirit, it cannot be "reformed."
Second, notice that almost none of the rampant "violent crimes" against children were recorded by Texas police and prosecutors and judges as "crimes." When "crime data" is reported to you, it systematically excludes crimes against people in cages.
Thread: There are some important things missing from the media's welcome attention on the humanitarian catastrophe at Rikers. Here are a few more things you should know about it: nytimes.com/2021/10/11/nyr…
First, not once in this story about the deplorable conditions at Rikers are the words "judge" or "prosecutor" mentioned. But know this: the most proximate cause of this disaster are the illegal and inhumane money bail, probation, and punishment practices of local judges/DAs.
Second, people have been talking about horrific jail conditions in thousands of U.S. jails since jails were created. Look at Eugene Debs' fantastic memoir Walls and Bars, or read this fantastic interview with Michel Foucault in the NYT from 1975: archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.co…