In the 1968 psychology paper, experiments on horse track gambler was undertaken.
Some were questioned prior to making a bet, others right after it.
Turns out those who made the bet were more confident than those who didn’t yet. Act of commitment itself can be a major fallacy.
You see this echo chamber of thinking across Twitter finance, from stocks & venture capital to real estate.
It is very difficult to find an investor who isn’t “talking to his book” and has a skill set of optionality to turn from one asset class to another objectively.
In other words, you don’t invest in multifamily real estate because your grandpa started the family business and you were spoon-fed the narrative.
You allocate capital there because it has the best risk to reward profile vs all other opportunities available to you at that time.
Our family business is in luxury real estate and has been doing great for over two decades now.
However, when allocating our capital, we look at each and every opportunity as objectively as possible with as little bias as possible.
Despite our family business expertise…
…if the luxury real estate in our markets becomes too expensive, and therefore too risky,
I’d much rather allocate capital to an opportunity — in another asset class — that has a better upside potential with a lower risk and ample margin of safety (asymmetric bet).
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I’ve tweeted this many times, but it doesn’t hurt repeating. When executing our luxury projects:
• we hardly ever use debt and if we do it would be well below 50% LTC
• we don’t use outside investors but our own permanent capital which has long term patience & staying power
• we demand a margin of safety (e.g. meaningful discount at entry) and we’d rather have a missed opportunity than to “pay up for quality” because paying up will hurt you in the luxury game
*unlike GPs that buy at any valuations chasing fees & promote our only upside is profit*
For years, I’ve read macro newsletters which held views of deflationary forces.
These academically gifted people, majority of whom never practiced what they wrote, were convinced deflation would persist because Treasury bonds were rising (yields were falling).
Quick example.
We are fortune enough to be invested in real estate in 4 different jurisdictions, on 3 different continents.
Over the last few years, especially last few months, all I’ve seen is rise in prices.
Even this morning I received a letter from Czech electricity…
…giant telling me they are permanently rising prices from today.
My local builders in various countries tell me the cost of materials is up by 20-30%, in some cases much more.
I run my Twitter as a investing journal of everything I’ve done and learned over the years, and…
• 7 out 10 respondents said achieving capital gains (not income) is the most important aspect when allocating to new alternative assets
• Many families are simply seeking good opportunities wherever they arise (not running a fixed portfolio)
• portfolio diversification (various funds, managers, global regions, asset classes, etc) and generating outsize returns are front of mind for most HNWIs & FOs
• In terms of sectors, Techonology is still the key focus, with the ongoing demand for venture capital deals/funds
• The key for most families is having access to the best-performing managers (most want to know that the fund managers they back are real rising stars)
• In times of crisis special situations & distressed credit funds should be an area of interest, and they have been popular
Evergrande should have defaulted years ago, so this isn't a surprise.
As an investor, I do hope the Chinese don't follow the footsteps of the West, especially the Europeans, who bailed everything and everyone out — creating a zombie economy.
Risks haven't been there for only a month, they have been there for a long time.
If the Chinese economy goes through a property market de-leveraging, it will be very painful in the short term, but create a fantastic buying opportunity.