It is understandable but wrong to blame parents for children who become addicted to hard drugs. Of course parenting matters. But so too do the facts that the culture encourages drug use; we lack a functioning mental health system; and that SF has effectively legalized hard drugs
The fact of the matter is that Corey is already everyone else's problem.
What makes Jacqui special, a rare jewel among the millions of parents with drug-addicted children, is that she overcame her shame to speak out publicly, and demand action
She first did so in the fall of 2019 & has continued to speak out ever since
I admire Jacqui very much and am proud to call her my friend
Out of admiration for her and her courageous story, I made her a pivotal character in San Fransicko
As a parent of two, I can't imagine the horror of losing a child to drug addiction, overdose, or poisoning. It's fair to say there are few things worse than having a child die. Nearly as bad is having to spend years worrying about whether your child was dead or alive.
Jacqui is doing the courageous, intelligent, and compassionate thing in demanding that her son be arrested. She is taking responsibility and deserves the gratitude of the whole of society. It is she, not the politicians nor the activists, who is speaking out for justice.
I think the people who are quick to blame parents are often themselves quite pained by the horror and confusion created by America's drug death crisis. In blaming parents, they seek to resolve the cognitive dissonance at how such a good nation could allow such horrible things.
But it's wrong to do so. Jacqui is taking responsibility, as should other parents. But even those parents who aren't doing anything can hardly be blamed: they are devastated emotionally, spiritually, and often physically. It's a miracle that Jacqui has the courage to speak out.
And so I would ask all whose instinct is to blame the parents to take a beat, and reflect empathically on the situation. Let he who is without sin throw the first stone.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
My friend Jacqui is trying to save her son’s life but progressives won’t let her. Why? Because he needs to be arrested, and the drug dealers who stab him & sell him fentanyl need to be arrested, and deported, and progressives are against arresting people they label “Victims”
Progressives say arresting murderous drug dealers & addicts is wrong and they point to Portugal and Netherlands as nations that legalized drugs as models.
But both Portugal and Netherlands arrest drug addicts and drug dealers and sentence them to prison or mandatory drug rehab
I asked the head of Portugal’s drug program point blank what would happen to people like Jacqui’s son who shoot heroin and smoke fentanyl in public. He said, “They would be arrested.” When I feigned surprise he said, “Yes! You would be sent to the police station.”
Democrats modeled their climate & environmental plans after California but we are facing energy shortages, saw our electricity prices rise 7x more than rest of US over the last decade, and are going to replace our last nuclear plant, which provides power to 3 million, with diesel
Californians spend 30% more for gasoline likely due the deep corruption at the highest levels of government, which have existed ever since former Gov @JerryBrownGov manipulated pollution laws, and killed nuclear plants, to benefit his family’s oil monopoly
California gasoline prices are now $4.50/gallon, which is 50% more than the national average
California is their model for the rest of the U.S. because in the progressive view, energy is bad and should be scarce and expensive — a win-win for oil barons & Malthusians
Greta Thunberg said “I want you to panic” and nations did. They over-invested in unreliable weather-dependent energy sources & under-invested in reliable energy. Now, global energy shortages are forcing the poor to choose between food & electricity
Overdependence on unreliable energies isn’t the only reason for energy shortages. Post-pandemic economic recovery resulted in higher energy demand. And too little natural gas stored on-site after a colder-than-expected winter played a role.
But the heavy investment in unreliable renewables made energy supplies more vulnerable to a single commodity’s volatility. Today’s grids mean that high gas prices cause energy price spikes and a return to the dirtiest forms of electricity production, including diesel and coal.
Everyone’s mad at West Virginia @Sen_JoeManchin but if Democrats really wanted action on climate change they would just do what the British, French, and Japanese have all just announced they will do, which is return to building nuclear power plants michaelshellenberger.substack.com/p/if-democrats…
In an extraordinary coincidence of timing, progressive climate activists discovered last weekend that West Virginia Senator Joe Manchin has ties to the coal industry at the very same moment that he made clear he wouldn’t support their legislation.
The novelist Don Winslow created a powerful Twitter video showing links between to the coal industry and Manchin’s wife, son, and daughter. It has gone super-viral.
Progressives are mad that Sen. Manchin killed the climate provisions in Biden's budget, but they shouldn't be. The provisions would have increased electricity prices, blackouts, and emissions. Congress should pass nuclear-focused legislation instead.
Progressives are mad that moderate Democratic @Sen_JoeManchin has reportedly opposed the inclusion of climate-related legislation in President Joe Biden’s budget “This is absolutely the most important climate policy in the package,” said Canadian political scientist @LeahStokes
Stokes helped write the legislation. “We fundamentally need it to meet our climate goals," she said, "That’s just the reality.”
But that’s not the reality. The “Clean Energy Performance Program” is not needed to meet climate goals, and might actually undermine them.
Readers of Apocalypse Never will recall that the book pivoted around my visit to Britain in 2019, where I had the surreal experience of making the case for nuclear at 10 Downing Street, and to then Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, as Extinction Rebellion activists shut down London
Why, I wondered, were the people who claimed to be most apocalyptic about climate change — eg Extinction Rebellion activists glueing themselves to train cars — also the most opposed to nuclear power?