I've been writing about #Stoicism and #psychotherapy for nearly a quarter of a century now. I started by giving talks on Stoicism at conferences for psychotherapists and discussing it with student counsellors, therapists, coaches, etc., on the training programs I ran in the UK.
My first book on Stoicism was meant to be an overview of the history of its influence on modern psychotherapists, for academics and clinicians. Instead, it became more widely read among nonacademics and "laypersons". Stoicism then became more popular, partly due to Stoic Week.
Authors like Bill Irvine, Ryan Holiday, and Massimo Pigliucci were reaching a wider audience of nonacademics. Communities for Stoicism formed on the Internet. Stoicism became a "thing" again. But something did NOT happen. To my surprise, psychotherapists largely ignored it.
I think there's a lot to learn from the relationship between Stoicism and modern psychotherapy. Nobody ever talks about Paul Dubois, for instance, a once-famous psychotherapist who was writing about Stoicism as a therapy at the start of the 20th century.
I'm just reviewing edits on an article I wrote about Stoicism and psychotherapy for a forthcoming Cambridge Companion to Marcus Aurelius' Meditations and thinking "Why don't people seem to know any of this stuff?"
A couple of years ago, I co-authored a review of how Stoicism compares to CBT for the journal "The Behavior Therapist", reaching out to modern clinicians. I got permission to republish it free of charge online so laypersons could read it as well. medium.com/stoicism-philo…
I kind of feel like this is all I've been talking and writng about for 25 years but I'm still surprised that when people talk about Stoicism today they often know nothing about how it relates to CBT or how specific psychological practices actually formed part of ancient Stoicism.
This is what ancient Stoics "did" with the philosophy.
It's how they put it into practice on a regular daily basis. I think in the information-centric age, though, everyone craves practical advice but few actually put it into practice.
Why do so many people read the Stoics but so few actually put it into practice in their daily lives? What could we do to help/encourage more people to actually experiment with Stoic psychological practices?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Donald J. Robertson

Donald J. Robertson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DonJRobertson

19 Aug
In The Meditations, Marcus thanks the gods he didn't fall under the spell of a Sophist when he first began to study philosophy. He must surely have in mind Herodes Atticus, who was by far the most famous Sophist of the era, and a family friend.
Herodes was raised in the household of his maternal grandfather, alongside Marcus' mother, Lucilla. However, he was in Athens when Marcus' higher education in rhetoric began, although he was appointed his Greek rhetoric tutor somewhat later.
Although Herodes was a family friend, arguably the leading intellectual of his day, and the most famous of his tutors, Marcus doesn't mention him once in The Meditations. Instead of Herodes, he praises more obscure teachers, including an unnamed tutor who was probably a slave.
Read 4 tweets
19 Aug
Here's a quick thread about how we know when The Meditations of Marcus Aurelius was written because although generally people get this right sometimes they're way off with the dates...
First of all, a note of caution, we don't know for certain that the whole text was composed around the same time, but I think it probably was. Marcus was a diligent student of philosophy and rhetoric and enjoyed writing. I doubt he'd have taken many years over these notes.
He mentions waiting for a baby to emerge from his wife's womb. Faustina's last child is believed to have been born 170 CE, so if taken literally this part is from 169/170 CE.
Read 10 tweets
23 Sep 20
Freud held back scientific progress in psychotherapy by roughly half a century.
Freud's notion of the unconscious mind was "...the sovereign means for believing what one likes in psychology, and for turning what might become a science into a tumbling-ground for whimsies." - William James
People think "Oh back in the day there wasn't any research." That's wrong. The Soviets were doing research on psychotherapy at the start of the 20th century and so were American behavioural psychologists. Freud and his followers nixed all that because... pseudoscience! :/
Read 8 tweets
23 Sep 20
🧙‍♂️ Socrates: If you love someone because they satisfy a need, like a medicine healing a sickness, then what reason do you have to continue loving them after the need has been satisfied?
"For if there were nothing to hurt us any longer, we should have no need of anything that would do us good.
"Then would be clearly seen that we did but love and desire the good because of the evil, and as the remedy of the evil, which was the disease; but if there had been no disease, there would have been no need of a remedy." – Plato, Lysis
Read 4 tweets
22 Sep 20
Paul Dubois:- A young man into whom I tried to instil a few principles of #stoicism towards ailments stopped me at the first words, saying, “I understand, doctor; let me show you.” And taking a pencil he drew a large black spot on a piece of paper.
“This,” said he, “is the disease, in its most general sense, the physical trouble – rheumatism, toothache, what you will – moral trouble, sadness, discouragement, melancholy.
If I acknowledge it by fixing my attention upon it, I already trace a circle to the periphery of the black spot, and it has become larger. If I affirm it with acerbity the spot is increased by a new circle.
Read 5 tweets
15 Sep 20
Some problems with allowing the emotion of anger to motivate your words and actions...
1. Anger biases our attention so that we narrow down the scope of our focus and selectively leave out information that would lead to a more accurate and balanced appraisal of complex situations.
2. Anger tends to be associated with a slew of cognitive distortions such as mind-reading, over-generalization, etc.
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(