Thread by @UR_Ninja

172 had wrote that "antifa is a group of extreme left wing members that is violent during their protests" on his questionnaire

Judge Moon asks that if he heard antifa was present at Unite The Right, would he assume they were responsible for the violence? "I would assume that was most likely" - 172
Moon asks that if the plaintiffs are not 'antifa' can he differentiate them and still decide the case fairly

172 wrote on his questionnaire that he could set aside his opinions when deciding the case, Judge Moon asks if that's still the case, he says yes. Moon sends him back to the jury room.

Plaintiffs have more Qs for this juror and ask for time to submit them - they're being sent on notes for Judge Moon to read

172 is asked if the plaintiffs prove "these defendants conspired to come to Charlottesville and conspired to take violent action... even tho other groups may have committed violent acts, can you try the case btwn these plaintiffs & these defendants, regardless...?" 172 says yes.

Potential juror 176 is in now - being asked the usual question about hardship, medical concerns, etc. - doesn't seem to be any

Judge Moon asks 176 if he'd heard of the "Unite The Right rally", 176 confuses this with the term "the right to rally." 176 says he doesn't really know much about the event, hadn't heard of the defendants. Tells Moon he doesn't have any reason to think he couldn't be a fair juror

some kind of squeaky device sounding like a rubber ducky just squeaked in the courtroom(?)

Plaintiffs submit a note asking 176 if he is "aware of any preconceived notions about the case" in favor of any parties", he says no. The squeaky sound is back again, probably a chair(?)

Richard Spencer says "since we don't have the questionnaire that he filled out, would it be appropriate for him to answer the questions that were on the questionnaire?" Plaintiffs suggest he fill out the questionnaire (apparently missing) - 176 says "it's in my car"

176 leaves, probably to get the form from his car, 177 is to come in next. Plaintiffs ask to raise an issue before they come in. "In regard to some jurors' extreme views about antifa, we do not think questions about the plaintiffs not being antifa...are sufficient"

Jurors with these views are "more likely to believe defendants' claims of self defense...while we don't think the plaintiffs are antifa we don't think [stating that] cures the issue".

Judge Moon. -"the evidence is likely to say that antifa committed certain acts of violence at this Unite The Right rally... but the fact that persons had not committed acts, that's one of the things where... the jury says they will follow the law and the evidence, i don't know"