If you are looking to "punish" Labour or the LibDems for not being (as you see it) not "instant rejoin enough", you might do well to consider that by the end of the next parliament...
...not a single person in their 20s will have had the chance to vote in the 2016 referendum.
Britain surely has had enough of narcissistic politics.
Those 20 somethings, & soon 30 somethings, who had no power over Brexit surely deserve better than to be held hostage by people trying to play silly games.
Time for sensible politics.
Strategic thinking.
& clever voting.
If the already 60%+ who dont want a Tory govt can find a way to get Conservative seat count below 310 then the next govt will be a coalition of 2 to 4 parties - all of whom have pro european voters, members, MPs & leaders.
If that isn't good enough for you - YOU are the problem.
With a fair wind rejoining the Single Market or at least something approaching it...is doable in the next parliament.
Not easy...but doable.
"Officially rejoining" the EU isn't.
But SM gets us 80% of the way there.
YOU can help make it happen.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
If theres anything that should gladden a rejoiners heart its this sort of article.
You can't cant rule out Britain chaning its mind in the coming years. That would be the end of democracy...which can only mean one thing:
...Brexiters are running scared.
The article is obviously correct in many things, eg:
"There is no appetite for letting the UK rejoin at any time soon – most certainly not with the budget rebate and opt-outs from Shengen and the Euro it previously enjoyed."
Which is why Rejoiners need to play smarter.
Every weakening of Brexit, every softening is a move in the right direction.
& part of that process will involve a phase of "making Brexit work" - rejoiners will have to campaign for making Brexit work as if Rejoin is a discreet far off dream, even as it brings it nearer...
One of the enduring myths of the last few years is that “before we joined Europe we traded more with the commonwealth & empire.”
It’s amazing how embedded this myth has become to the point that even some remainers believed it.
But it’s utterly wrong.
For the last 200 years Britain’s biggest trading partner has been Europe - not the empire and not, later, the commonwealth.
This makes sense both from geography as well as comparable industrial development reasons.
However there was a time in history when this wasn’t the case…
The time when UK traded more with empire than Europe was during the “trilateral trade” era - when Britain exported manufactured goods to Africa, slaves to America, then agricultural goods back to UK.
Of course this was not free trade” but “coercion trade”.
Boris Johnson is the expression of "Brexitism national will".
What Brexit is..is what Boris Johnson wants it to be today, not what Johnson said it was last year - which could be something utterly different.
That is why you must get rid of Boris Johnson 1st.
All flows from that.
Its hard for many to grasp this.
Indeed especially hard for many remainers who are immune to Johnson schtick.
It seems so..."unbritish".
But that is where we are.
To deny this is to deny the journey this country has been on.
We cannot even begin to roll this back until he goes.
)0% of people dont the difference between free trade, the WTO & a customs union.
Why should they..they have busy lives to lead.
Brexit thus can only "percieved" as a "feeling" or a "picture" thru which hopes/emotions are projected.
Matt Hancock to be rejected by the UN after publication of Britain’s disastrous handling of the Covid pandemic.
Boris Johnson had attempted to place former UK health minister Hancock in an top United Nation’s Africa Covid role but UN now look to have turned this down.
Matt Hancock had apparently been advised by Boris Johnson that his appointment was “in the bag” and so announced his position before checking with the UN.
BBC confirms story.
UN nations, particularly African countries, resented having someone who was in charge of one of Europe’s worst Covid response being foisted upon them by Boris Johnson
OK don’t hate me but I’m coming round to the “world cup every 2 years” idea.
There are more reasons than one might think at 1st glance why this makes sense.
1. The premier league is turning into a super league in itself with 5-6 other European clubs dominating football.
The gap between these and most clubs is widening every day.
International football is now, strangely, a more equalising force in football than club football.
In other words as club football gets more detached from the mainstream - international football is filing this gap by providing genuine completion where money is not the overriding insurmountable factor.