🧵Few things to look out for in tomo’s Budget/Spending Review.
First, economic growth forecasts
They will almost certainly be raised - but by how much?
As you can see we are already running above the levels forecast in Mar. But when if ever do we get back to trend (dotted line)?
Given it’s a Budget we’ll doubtless have more taxes. But actually most of the action on this front has already happened. The Corp tax and NICs increases represent the biggest combined tax increase since the early 1990s. Seems unlikely anything tomo will change this big picture
It’s already been leaked that @RishiSunak will freeze fuel duty.
One can understand the rationale given soaring petrol costs.
But it’s a v hard one to square with govt’s green pledges. This is the UK’s biggest green tax!
Most likely is if the Chancellor does freeze fuel duty he announces a host of incentives for electric cars alongside it. But it’s still somewhat discordant, coming the week before COP. If UK is too scared to raise this tax on emissions then what hope of reaching net zero?
But perhaps the most consequential thing tomorrow is the Spending Review. It’s the first multi-year SR since 2015. And given all @George_Osborne’s SRs were really austerity reviews (largely abt NOT spending), it’s the first “proper” SR since the Gordon Brown era. (chart: @theIFS)
With that in mind, a v quick primer about what on earth the spending review actually IS.
In short: it sets departmental spending totals for the coming three years. The key word there is “departmental”. Why? Let’s remind ourselves where the govt actually spends our money…
Here’s ALL govt spending in the latest year for which we have data: just over a trillion quid.
Well over half of that is spending that can’t easily be controlled year-on-year: debt interest, pensions, welfare etc. The blue bits here - technical name Annually Managed Expenditure
The Spending Review is only really focused on the RED bits here - “departmental spending”.
If we pull them out you see departments spend 385bn on day-to-day costs (wages etc) and 100bn on capital investment (broadband, roads, hospital buildings etc).
Those figs are going up...
So take day-to-day (resource) spending. It's going up by £56bn. But we already know £14bn is going on the NHS (that announcement last month). We know about £6bn shd go on schools/aid. So the SR is really about what's left: £36bn. Who gets that?
Certainly, for some depts the settlements will be disappointing. While this SR isn't all about cutting, many depts still have real terms budgets way below their 2010 levels. Aid is no longer as generous as during the Cameron era. But nonetheless: this is not an austerity SR.
So perhaps the most interesting thing we'll learn tomorrow is: what does a Tory chancellor do when they have the opportunity to spend money rather than slashing it? It's really the first time we'll have had an answer to that question.
Of course there will be plenty of other stuff too: new fiscal rules most probably, something on business rates, specifics about some of the capital spending plans (tho I'm told HS2 strategy won't get announced tomo). Not to mention the inevitable rabbits 🐇.
Today is @RishiSunak's third Budget. But it might be his first proper Budget. A few things to look out for in today's bit political event news.sky.com/story/budget-2…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ed Conway

Ed Conway Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @EdConwaySky

20 Oct
OK that’s enough cross-country comparisons. How is the situation in the UK re cases, admissions and deaths? These charts tell some of that story. In short, the vaccines seem to be doing their job. Back in the late 2020 wave, look how correlated those lines were. Not any more.
I say the “vaccines are working”. But hang on: in that case why are even more vaccinated people dying of COVID now than unvaccinated people?
The answer comes back to CONTEXT, which is all-important here. Consider the latest data from English hospitals… assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…
In the most recent period (13 Sept - 10 Oct) there were 2,805 Covid deaths in this database.
2,136 of them were fully-vaccinated.
Only 557 of were unvaccinated people (NB by unvaccinated I mean no doses at all).
Easy to assume from that the vaccines aren’t working. But hold on
Read 16 tweets
20 Oct
I really REALLY didn’t want to have to do another Covid thread. Really. But given the numbers are on the rise - along with the inevitable hot takes (we’re heading for disaster! The vaccines aren’t working!), I’m dipping my toe back in the waters. Hopefully not for long. 🧵
Let’s start with this chart. You’ve prob seen it elsewhere. This Scary Chart shows that the UK’s COVID situation looks UNIQUELY terrible. Just look at that red line compared with other countries!
But that chart 👆misses out the most important bit of context: for better or worse the UK is doing far more Covid testing than almost any other country (first chart here). Put those two datapoints together to see positive tests as a % of total and UK situation looks less dramatic
Read 17 tweets
19 Oct
If net zero is going to happen we need to re-do the industrial revolution all over again.
It’s hard to express how big a deal this is.
But I’ve had a go here:
edmundconway.com/the-industrial…
The point is the Industrial Revolution wasn’t just about steel or textile manufacture.
It was a chemicals revolution
A concrete revolution
A glassmaking revolution
An aluminium revolution
A metals refining revolution
Plastics, silicon, fertilisers, batteries… I could go on…
And, guess what, ALL of those processes emit carbon. Sometimes via energy (OK so we can power them via renewables)
But also invariably carbon is emitted as part of the chemical/industrial process itself.
This chart from today’s HMT review of net zero underlines it.
CO2 EVERYWHERE
Read 4 tweets
18 Oct
Here’s a thread abt a few of the most important things you need to know about getting to net zero and eliminating carbon emissions, but before we get stuck in let’s begin with a question.
How much do you suppose governments around the world are spending on research into energy?
If you’re anything like me you’re probably assuming they’re spending more than ever before. After all, they say they’re serious about averting climate change. They’ve pledged to eliminate emissions by 2050, right? And to do that we’re going to need serious tech breakthroughs…
This is an @IEA chart that underlines that need for tech breakthroughs. These bars show you how the world eliminates CO2 emissions by 2050. The key thing to focus on is the yellow bit.
Nearly HALF of all the emissions reductions are due to “technologies under development”
Read 30 tweets
8 Oct
New: Kristalina Georgieva's position as IMF managing director is hanging in the balance. She's up before the IMF Executive Board today in what insiders fear could turn into a dismissal hearing. If so it would make her the shortest-lived IMF MD in fund history.
Georgieva's position has been in doubt since an internal investigation concluded she was involved in manipulation of data in a key World Bank report, Doing Business, which favoured China. She denies any wrongdoing. If other things weren't aligned against her perhaps she'd survive
IMF sources fear Georgieva has fallen out of favour with the White House, and given the US has the most votes at the Exec board that is a big problem for her. She may retain the backing of some EU states but most are waiting to see what the Biden admin decides
Read 6 tweets
28 Sep
It’s all very well govt assuring us there’s no shortage of petrol supply, or that the crisis is abating.
I've no reason to doubt them.
But surely the simplest way to assure everyone would be to publish the last few weeks' data on fuel stocks and sales?
news.sky.com/story/when-jus…
We know such data exists because up until v recently BEIS was publishing it - every week - as a COVID-related stat.
They stopped doing so v recently.
Based on the publication schedule we won’t get fresh data on this latest period for MONTHS.
This is not good enough.
There’s nothing stopping govt from publishing this data, save - I presume - for an inherent bias towards secrecy.
If they published it it could prove definitively that there was no shortage in forecourts before the panic buying.
So for heavens sake SHOW US THE DATA…
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(