3. The on-going friction over negotiations in a sub-group of only part of the membership (“#plurilateral” talks, officially “joint-statement initiatives”, JSIs, seen as a way to progress when the membership is deadlocked) versus objections.
“A couple” = India and SAfrica
3/4
In this case it’s plurilateral on digital trade and multilateral on the moratorium on tax.
In an earlier annual report it’s about domestic regulation in services. On that point, see this comment from @DmitryOpines
FOR—suspending protection will allow countries to copy vaccines and other products
AGAINST—other solutions are effective, protection is needed as incentives for innovation, no evidence that a #TRIPSWaiver will help transfer technology
2/7
More interesting (1)—the US
According to sources: US said
• it appreciated both sides’ efforts
• members should focus only on vaccines to ensure consensus
• seek solutions likely to gain consensus
1. These are talks among a subset of the @wto membership—a “plurilateral” involving 65 of the 164 members—a negotiation among the willing. It’s seen as a way of getting around the consensus rule.
2. There has been some opposition from India, South Africa and some others who complain that deals among only some members violate the “multilateral” principle of the WTO.
But may be difficult for them to block this one. It all depends on the details