"We are public defenders. New York’s gun laws eviscerate our clients’ Second Amendment rights." scotusblog.com/2021/10/we-are…
"Faced with a 3.5-year mandatory minimum prison sentence, Jose pled to a lesser charge. His sentence was one year on Rikers Island — a 'good deal' for simple firearm possession in New York City. For exercising a constitutional right, Jose is now a so-called violent felon."
"That licensing requirement is the key to New York’s ban on firearm possession: It is a pretext whose true purpose is to make firearm possession unlawful. For our clients, it makes the Second Amendment a legal fiction."
"In New York City, where we practice, the licensing structure allocates total and unilateral discretion to the NYPD to decide whose firearm possession is lawful and whose is a 'violent felony.' It charges hefty fees, disproportionately burdening indigent people."
"As former Mayor Michael Bloomberg explained, the city believes that racially disparate approach is justified. As a result, virtually all — about 96% — of the people arrested by the NYPD for simple firearm possession are Black or Latinx."
"These broad laws make every simple possession case a 'violent felony,' even reaching people who did not actually intend to possess a loaded firearm at all."
"The victims of this system include Victor Mercado, whom police arrested this summer after they allegedly found a handgun in his car. Unable to pay the $100,000 bail that a Bronx judge set, Mercado contracted COVID-19 at Rikers. Last week, he died."
That's the thing, though: They don't want gun laws to be challenged, ever.
"Instead, the Supreme Court must invalidate New York’s licensing requirement, so that the state can no longer pretextually violate its people’s constitutional right to keep and bear arms."
"However, because of New York’s licensing requirement, none of this is legally relevant: Everyone who possessed a firearm for self-defense, but without a license, is a 'violent felon.' That does not square with a constitutional right to keep and bear arms for self-defense."
"Like people in other states that properly recognize the Second Amendment, Jose and Mercado also had that right. They did not deserve to be punished for exercising it."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Everytown's Federal Legal Director says that this lawsuit "is about the NRA's radical gun agenda, not the law," and that it "has nothing to do with the Constitution and everything to do with gun industry profits."
Everytown's Federal Legal Director says that "the NRA wants to use this case as a first step towards rolling back hundreds of gun safety laws across the country" and that it will "put nearly every gun safety law at risk"
New York v. NRA (NY state court): National Rifle Association's opposition to motion to intervene
"This baseless Motion is a transparent effort by a member of the Association to frustrate the collective will of millions of members..." iapps.courts.state.ny.us/nyscef/ViewDoc…
Nelson asks McDougall about mootness. Asks if it fits into capable of repetition but evading review, or should be just kept alive for damages. McDougall says the county never said they wouldn't do it again, and they still have the power to do it again.
NYSRPA v. Bruen (#SCOTUS, 20-843): Reply brief for petitioners
"The state now retreats to the equally indefensible claims that the right vanishes in 'populous areas' and extends only to those with a 'non-speculative need' to exercise it." supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/20/2…
"When the state is not rewriting the historical record, it is attacking arguments petitioners did not make, while defending a law it did not pass and licenses it did not issue."
"The Court should reverse the decision below and hold that petitioners have a right to do what even the state now concedes the Constitution protects: bear arms outside the home for self-defense."
NEW: Fischer v. Remington (S.D. OH): Federal judge orders man to pay Hornady $3,600 after falsely claiming that his rifle contained the company's ammo when it exploded, when it was actually using handloaded ammo from 1993. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
Mr. Shope sent a letter to the court last May after learning that Hornady wanted sanctions against him, where he said that the company "was kinda nasty with me" and that "it wasn't a deliberate lie or my grandson would have won, not lost."