The current angst that the FT is reporting in some parts of the "investment community" tells us more about the woefully inadequate state of most investment analysis than it does about the fair value of TSLA shares
Let's examine this a bit more closely :
1. Equity Investment is about buying growth
- and the best growth to buy is that which will continue for a long time
2. To be able to see and buy growth you have to look out out into the future at least 5 years and preferably 10 years
3. When Buying a stock it is largely irrelevant what today's or next year's earnings are or what today's or next year's P/E Multiple is or will be
- and yet that is all you hear most of the time
4. In a world where P/E Multiples are the most common valuation metric, all you need to know about the future is the projected Net Income
- and you need to have the skill to estimate this based on unit metrics, sales prices, gross margins and overhead costs
5. As a first level of reference, to be a worthwhile Equity Investment a company's Net Income should be expected to grow by at least 2x over the next five years or by at least 4x over the next 10 years
- and this should be easy to determine
6. As a first order of business, analysts should start by taking management's own projections for their business performance and valuing them on that basis
- and yet in Tesla's case we see analysts deliberately avoiding doing that, by large margins
This is perverse
7. Second-guessing management is a dangerous game, and should only be considered as a counterpoint after fairly valuing management's own guidance
- and it should be clearly disclosed as such, with specific reasons
8. If you are going to discount the future Equity Value of a company back to the present, you should use a desirable long-term Equity Rate of Return
- and not some rate cobbled together from interest rates or called WACC which is actually a blend of Equity and Debt costs
9. If you keep it simple and approach the analysis intelligently, it is not at all difficult to see why Tesla is valued at its current stock price
The Wall Street community of "equity investment analysts" seem to have lost sight of these simple, basic and fundamental rules
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Tesla has booked 45 GWh of Lithium Iron Phosphate LFP batteries from Chinese power cell giant CATL for next year's sales plan, primarily for the Model 3 and Model Y vehicles, 36kr reported today cnevpost.com/2021/10/29/tes…
In addition to booking 45 GWh of batteries from CATL, Tesla plans to add to existing orders, and the two sides are already in talks, the report said, citing people familiar with the matter
CATL would not comment, the report said
Tesla and Panasonic's Nevada battery plant will also expand to produce more than 40 GWh in 2022, and together with supplies from LG Chem, Tesla's 2022 sales will be at least 1.5 million units, the report said, citing industry sources
Hertz's global business model is based on franchising, and in Sweden the rights are held by First Rent a Car AB
- We are owned by Volvo Cars and mainly provide Volvo and Polestar, says Swedish Hertz mestmotor.se/recharge/artik…
Cecilia Saberi, communications manager at Swedish Hertz, tells Dagens Industri that customers have been asking if Tesla cars will be available for rent in Sweden
The answer is no
Swedish Hertz itself decides which cars to buy
And its ownership by Volvo is a strong reason for them not to buy Teslas in Sweden
"Right now we are seeing a high demand among electric cars for the Polestar - a car that we are unique in offering to our customers" says Michel Basberber, Hertz sales manager in Sweden