🧵 Bullying and cyberbullying: feeling compelled to defend yourself
When bullies impugn your character, this for many people is the red line 'I cannot let this pass, I can't let them get away with this'.
Unfortunately this is a very common tactic employed by bullies.
(1/18)
A lot of this thread is not unique to this kind of bullying but I'll use it as the main example.
The bully attacks, and attacks, and recruits other people into the attack. Bullies can work in networks that are coordinated to varying degrees.
(2/18)
They also 'recruit' other people into the bullying in less active forms such as exclusion and isolation. Raising questions about the character of the victim is a powerful means of doing this because this elicits very strong reactions as well a kind of obscene curiousity.
(3/18)
The victim may have done action A (or is thought to have done it, no real basis is required). Compared to 'They did A', 'What kind of person could do A?' is usually a far more powerful motivator of social interest, disgust and judgement.
(4/18)
Such character 'concerns' or attacks can be more contagious and simultaneously be hard to both pin down as well as refute.
E.g. 'She thinks she's so much better than everyone else!'.
Did she ever say that? I don't know but you just have to look at the way she acts.
(5/18)
How does she act?
She doesn't talk to anyone, she just keeps to herself (because you've excluded her).
She got angry with us for no reason (because you kept harassing her).
She keeps crying, acting like she's the victim here (because she is).
(6/18)
Have you ever spoken to her yourself?
No, I don't like people who are so full of themselves.
Are you in the same class/department as her?
No, but I've heard about her from other people.
This is to illustrate the contagion and how the victim is damned if they do/don't.
(7/18)
As an aside, if the victim speaks to the people who have been recruited in this way after the abuse has passed, they often cannot really recall what it was all about (because it was about v. little that was tangible) & may be puzzled as to why the victim feels resentment.
(8/18)
For the victim, the attack on one's character is crushing. 'How can they say these things? How can they be this way? What could I have done to deserve this?'
They find themselves having to defend themselves solely because they are being attacked (classic abuser tactic)
(9/18)
The outrage at this attack on their character, pushes the victim into fighting back to defend their character 'I am not who they say I am'. The victim wants to at least give their own account of themselves if not achieve the outcome of defending their character.
(10/18)
The bullies don't care about the outcome, their interest is in the process i.e. attacking the victim. Every reaction of the victim becomes additional fuel to add to the fire.
The further the victim engages, the more intense the attacks.
(11/18)
They can't back down or walk away because it feels like they would be failing to defend themselves. And all the while they never had to.
The bullies got them into this position, and sometimes they are further trapped by their own very rightful indignation and outrage.
(12/18)
'I can't let them get away this!'
The victim tries to regain some power by wresting it back from the bullies by trying to win the intellectual and moral argument (which even if they win, will not lead to them being able to walk away having regained power).
(13/18)
The powerlessness and hopelessness of the situation are crushing.
What can you do?
Very often there is no way to win from within the situation.
However there can be the option to change the playing field and retake some of your power.
(14/18)
This essentially means refusing to play the game. The price will be knowing that you did not take on and win the moral and intellectual argument. That can feel v. difficult and like one has failed.
(15/18)
To quote my colleague @sadiestrong it's difficult because 'it activates parts of us that had no voice in the past' but 'the difference is choosing not to speak rather than having silence forced upon you.'
(16/18)
It can help to have other people remind you that this was never the game. For most of us there is little chance of justice and reparation within the systems in which we are bullied. Thus it is vital to find supports within the system and outside who will stand with you.
(17/18)
Others who will bear witness, who will remind you that your character is not in question and that you do not need to question or defend yourself, who will support you and stay with you either as you ride out the abuse or make plans to escape it.
(18/18)
PS: Just want to clarify, this thread is not about (or for) me or my experiences.
It is however particularly about and for victims who have the least privileges and most disadvantages.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵COVID-19 and how a minority who hold power have endangered the world:
This isn't the only situation in which this minority have done this (see climate catastrophe) but I'm just talking about controlling the pandemic here or to be precise our inability to do so.
(1/8)
At the very outset, a global pandemic should have had a concerted and coordinated global response i.e. novel virus, serious acute illness, let's play it safe and suppress. Instead, you know what happened.
(2/8)
Over the last several months, we've seen what has happened when countries that had successfully managed their pandemic (Vietnam, Singapore) tried reopening. Cases & deaths started to rise again. Because once you open up travel you'll start bringing in cases again.
(3/8)
🧵 LongCOVID and post-COVID sequelae:
Minimisation now sets up minimisation later
About how these are being minimised right now & for the future, with reference to the JCVI plan to deliberately infect children to control the UK pandemic and serve as boosters for adults
(1/18)
This isn't going to be a summary of the research so far on this area. We now have more than enough evidence* that COVID is associated with a risk for ongoing ill health as well as for future ill-health.
*enough to know that you would much rather not have it.
(2/18)
It is now clear that LongCOVID alone can be a very severe and debilitating illness. However LongCOVID most likely represents the more severe end of early post COVID sequelae.
*enough to know that you would much rather not have it.
(3/18)
If you have not heard it, I highly recommend listening to this fantastic interview performance from @dgurdasani1, both for the clear communication of information and risks and for calling out the misogyny is real time.
(1/21)
She doesn't call it out as misogyny in the interview. She just calls out, names and challenges the inappropriate treatment she receives.
That inappropriate treatment is misogyny and she calls it out in this tweet. And very rightly.
(2/21)
When women call out misogyny, the most typical male response (and to some extent, the female response) is outrage, 'how dare she accuse me of misogyny?'.
This is based on a very literal and incorrect view of misogyny based on intentionality 'you're saying I hate women!'.
(3/21)
This was the 🧵I had planned for this weekend. It started out with mental health systems but then got a bit into COVID as well.
It's about how scarcity shapes, and is used to shape, systems and the people within them.
(1/50)
I'm going to start with mental health services (MHS), partly because they will always be closer to heart, but also because it'll help illustrate the various levels this operates at. It'll take a bit of unpacking so please bear with me.
(2/50)
A couple of points upfront: 1. Scarcity has to be thought about as both an in-the-moment & a long-term factor i.e. it shapes systems and people over the longer term and has accumulated effects that interact with the in-the-moment scarcity.
(3/50)
🧵About these tweets by Phil Magness: why is he talking about lockdowns?
TL; DR: Assume there's a purpose.
Earlier today, Phil QTed a poor article he wrote this week last year about the 'strawman' of lockdown and followed it up with a list of the people in the article.
(1/24)
Why retweet this now? I get it's about a year to the date but you only usually mark the anniversaries of things that are significant or good.
The article is on the website of AIER, which is closely linked with the GBD, and are pro-herd immunity & increasingly anti-vax.
(3/24)
🧵 'Living with' COVID-19: why do we have to & what is it going to be like?
(TL;DR: because that's what our leaders have led us to & it'll be a bit like what things are like now in the UK and Sweden, only a lot worse.)
Longer answer ⬇️
(1/30)
'Living with the virus' is not going to be for everyone. One major group it won't work very well for are those who will die from* the virus (conservative estimate- in the region of 40,000 every year in the UK)
*if you're going to say 'with', this isn't the 🧵 for you.
(2/30)
It will mean living with ongoing infections and their short and long term consequences, for health and for the rest of life. In case there is any doubt, COVID-19 is not an infection you want to catch, it is definitely not one that you would want your child to catch.
(3/30)