It's common to think that:

– middle-income countries only have high CO₂ emissions because they're making stuff for rich countries

– rich countries have only managed to reduce CO₂ because they're exporting emissions elsewhere

🧵with data on how we can test these assumptions
The @gcarbonproject publish annual estimates of consumption-based emissions. These adjust for emissions embedded in the making of traded goods.

We present all of this on @OurWorldInData here: ourworldindata.org/co2-emissions#…

Map shows:
– Net exporters (blue)
– Net importers (red)

1/
This confirms what most of us would expect.

Most countries in 'West' import emissions. Rather than making goods themselves (and dealing with those emissions), they import from other countries.

Most countries in the 'East' export emissions. They produce goods for others

2/
But extent of this varies a lot.

This shows traded emissions as a % of a country's domestic emissions.

Positive = net importers
Negative = net exporters

e.g. China's net exported emissions are 10% of its domestic emissions.

UK's net imports are 42% of its domestic

3/
This means is that UK's 'consumption-based' emissions are 42% higher than production-based.

For net exporters, like China, it's the opposite. Production-based emissions are 10% higher than consumption-based.

Data for other countries here: ourworldindata.org/grapher/produc…

4/
I think many assume that some countries – like China – only have growing per capita emissions because they're producing goods for everyone else.

This was more true in the past than it is today. It used to have net exports of 20-25%. This is falling and is now "only" 10%

5/
Middle-income countries have moderate emissions because their citizens now have higher standards of living (which require energy). They're no longer serving the rest of the world.

Here is per capita CO₂ adjusted for trade. China sits in middle.

bit.ly/3nLo0Yw

6/
Are rich countries *only* reducing emissions by exporting them elsewhere?

Yes & no

In UK, reductions less impressive with consumption-based emissions (-19% since 1990, rather than -37%)

But *are* falling by both measures

Data for other countries 👉🏼 bit.ly/3EsQAom

7/
Many countries have been able to increase GDP while reducing emissions. And this is not just because they're offloading emissions elsewhere. It also applies to consumption-based emissions which adjust for this.

ourworldindata.org/grapher/co2-em…

8/
Overall, a lot of the narrative on CO₂ exports & imports is outdated

➜ West imports; East exports
➜ Less than people assume
➜ Trade isn't what's solely determining differences in CO₂ across the world
➜ Rich countries not only reducing CO₂ by offloading it elsewhere

9/
Thanks to @gcarbonproject for providing data that helps us untangle these questions.

At @OurWorldInData we did further number-crunching to make it all accessible. You can explore this data for different countries via our interactive charts here: ourworldindata.org/co2-emissions#…

/end

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Hannah Ritchie

Hannah Ritchie Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @_HannahRitchie

14 Sep
There's a new study out on young peoples' attitudes to climate change.

Survey on 16-25yo across 10 countries. 1,000 people in each country.

Since it's in the media quite a bit, but data not quick to find, I plotted some of the results 🧵👇
56% of surveyed young people said "humanity was doomed" due to climate change.

1/
75% of surveyed young people said the "future is frightening" due to climate change.

2/
Read 9 tweets
6 Aug
A common claim is that smallholder farmers produce 80% of the world's food. UN FAO has repeated this.

This is not correct.

Smallholders produce around one-third of the world's food.

My latest @OurWorldInData article looks at the numbers: ourworldindata.org/smallholder-fo… Image
A key problem here is that people start using 'small farms' and 'family farms' interchangeably.

But these are different. Family farms can be any size: some are huge.

Unfortunately the use of these terms interchangeably creates a bit of a messy trail in the literature.

1/
Smallholder farms (less than 2 hectares) produce around one-third of the world's food.

Family farms (which has a very broad definition) produce around 80% of the world's food.

These are not the same. And policies focused on these groups will not be the same.

2/
Read 6 tweets
12 Jul
Food is about more than calories: we need a wide range of nutrients, vitamins & minerals.

A healthy diet is more than 4 times the cost of a basic, calorie-sufficient one.

As a result, three billion people cannot afford a healthy diet.

My latest post: ourworldindata.org/diet-affordabi…
You can get calories in cheaply if you rely on staple foods like cereals & starchy roots.

Across the world, the cheapest calorie-sufficient diet costs about $1 per day.

Unfortunately hundreds of millions still go without.

1/
'Healthy' diets that meet nutritional guidelines are much more expensive because they contain a wide variety of foods.

Costs around 4x as much in most countries.

Three billion people cannot afford this even if they spend most of their income on food.

2/
Read 7 tweets
1 May
Where does the plastic in the ocean come from?

A new study published in @ScienceAdvances updates our understanding.

My latest @OurWorldInData article looks at the global picture of plastic pollution: ourworldindata.org/ocean-plastics

Thread of key points 👇
Previous studies suggested a small number of big rivers accounted for most of ocean plastics.

But higher-resolution data suggests many more small rivers play a big role.

To cover 80% of plastic inputs you need to tackle > 1,000 rivers.

1/
Factors that matter a lot for a river's plastic inputs:
– waste management practices
– distance to coast
– cities nearby
– precipitation rates
– slope of terrain

Here are the top 10 rivers 👇
(most are small rivers in the Philippines)

2/
Read 10 tweets
4 Mar
Half of world's ice- and desert-free land is used for agriculture. Most for meat & dairy.

Dietary changes could reduce this by as much as 75%.

But you don't have to go vegan: massive reductions by simply switching to chicken, eggs, fish.

Latest article: ourworldindata.org/land-use-diets
A point that comes up often: "grazing land is not suitable for growing crops".

True. Two-thirds of grazing land is not great for crops.

But that's okay: more plant-based diets tend to need *less* cropland, not more.

How can this be true? 👇

2/
It's because so much of our cropland is used to produce feed for animals.

Less than half of the world's cereals go directly to human food.

3/
Read 6 tweets
14 Jan
"We only have 100 / 60 / 30 harvests left" often hits the headlines. It's a myth. No scientific basis to it.

In fact, soil erosion rates span five orders of magnitude. Some are eroding quickly, some very little, and others are actually thickening.

1/

ourworldindata.org/soil-lifespans
First global assessment of soil lifespans by @DanEvansol & colleagues shows:

→ lifespans cross five orders of magnitude
→ 16% had < 100 years
→ 50% had > 1000 years
→ One-third had > 5000 years
→ some soils are thickening

2/
So the "60 harvests left" claim is overblown. But it shouldn't detract from the fact that soil erosion *is* a problem.

Thankfully there are things we can do:
→ cover cropping
→ minimal or no-till
→ contour cultivation

These soils showed longer lifespans in the study.

3/
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(