I think many assume that some countries – like China – only have growing per capita emissions because they're producing goods for everyone else.
This was more true in the past than it is today. It used to have net exports of 20-25%. This is falling and is now "only" 10%
5/
Middle-income countries have moderate emissions because their citizens now have higher standards of living (which require energy). They're no longer serving the rest of the world.
Here is per capita CO₂ adjusted for trade. China sits in middle.
Many countries have been able to increase GDP while reducing emissions. And this is not just because they're offloading emissions elsewhere. It also applies to consumption-based emissions which adjust for this.
Overall, a lot of the narrative on CO₂ exports & imports is outdated
➜ West imports; East exports
➜ Less than people assume
➜ Trade isn't what's solely determining differences in CO₂ across the world
➜ Rich countries not only reducing CO₂ by offloading it elsewhere
9/
Thanks to @gcarbonproject for providing data that helps us untangle these questions.
Previous studies suggested a small number of big rivers accounted for most of ocean plastics.
But higher-resolution data suggests many more small rivers play a big role.
To cover 80% of plastic inputs you need to tackle > 1,000 rivers.
1/
Factors that matter a lot for a river's plastic inputs:
– waste management practices
– distance to coast
– cities nearby
– precipitation rates
– slope of terrain
Here are the top 10 rivers 👇
(most are small rivers in the Philippines)