Thirty years ago, the Soviet Union ceased to be. The flag was lowered for the last time on Dec. 25, 1991.
That moment still begs deep questions for the U.S.S.R’s heirs: “Who were we as Soviets and where are we going as Russians?” wapo.st/2XXuPNW
Many of those answers can be found on a Moscow boulevard.
Welcome to Tverskaya Street. It was the Soviet Union’s display window on the bright future Kremlin-run communism was supposed to bring. wapo.st/2XXuPNW
It's where Russians danced in the time of the czars, where Stalin ordered buildings moved, where Western fast food arrived and where dissidents still gather.
Under President Vladimir Putin, it is a symbol of his dreams of reviving Russia as a great power. wapo.st/2XXuPNW
In the 1990s, Tverskaya embodied the fast-money excess of the post-Soviet free for all.
In later years, it was packed with hopeful pro-democracy marchers.
Join a tour of Moscow’s famed Tverskaya Street: wapo.st/2XXuPNW
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
While the public may have been surprised by what happened on Jan. 6, the makings of the insurrection had been spotted at every level, from one side of the country to the other.
Intelligence officials never envisioned a mass attack against the government incited by a sitting president.
Yet Trump was the driving force at every turn as he orchestrated what would become an attempted political coup leading up to Jan. 6. wapo.st/3mvC3lN
Again and again, top government officials received warnings but did not act.
The FBI largely regarded social media posts about Jan. 6 — even those discussing bringing firearms, arresting lawmakers and shooting police — as protected First Amendment speech. wapo.st/3mvC3lN
Tens of thousands of diplomats, researchers, protesters and presidents from around the globe are scheduled to descend on Glasgow, Scotland, starting next week for a critical United Nations climate summit. wapo.st/3BiAeNa
The overarching goal of COP26 is to get countries to commit to more ambitious, detailed plans to cut their planet-warming emissions and collectively slow climate change.
The Post spoke to people around the world — including youth activists, scientists, government leaders and people whose livelihoods are threatened by climate change — to hear in their own words why COP26 matters and what is at stake if countries fail. wapo.st/3BiAeNa
Facebook researchers had deep knowledge of how coronavirus and vaccine misinformation moved through the company’s apps, according to documents disclosed by Facebook whistleblower Frances Haugen. wapo.st/3mmERBx
But even as academics, lawmakers and the White House urged Facebook for months to be more transparent about the misinformation and its effects on the behavior of its users, the company refused to share much of this information publicly.
Most political parties in Poland have complaints about Facebook’s algorithms, the obscure formulas that decide which posts pop up on a user’s news feed and which fade into the ether.
The Confederation’s content generally does well, including a slew of anti-lockdown, anti-immigration, vaccine-skeptic posts often punctuated with large red exclamation marks.
It’s a “hate algorithm,” said the head of the party’s social media team. wapo.st/3GvqiDC
That Facebook might be amplifying outrage — while driving polarization and elevating more extreme parties around the world — has been ruminated inside the company for years, according to the internal documents known as the Facebook Papers. wapo.st/3GvqiDC
Facebook’s news feed algorithm has been blamed for fanning sectarian hatred, steering users toward extremism and conspiracy theories, and incentivizing politicians to take more divisive stands. wapo.st/3bdEHpG
It’s in the spotlight thanks to waves of revelations from The Facebook Papers and testimony from whistleblower Frances Haugen, who argues it’s at the core of the company’s problems. wapo.st/3bdEHpG
Since 2018, the algorithm has elevated posts that encourage interaction, such as ones popular with friends. This broadly prioritizes posts by friends and family and viral memes, but also divisive content. wapo.st/3bdEHpG
Starting in 2017, Facebook’s ranking algorithm treated emoji reactions as five times more valuable than “likes,” internal documents reveal.
The theory was simple: Posts that prompted lots of reaction emoji tended to keep users more engaged. wapo.st/3GniSCx
Facebook’s own researchers were quick to suspect a critical flaw.
Favoring “controversial” posts could open “the door to more spam/abuse/clickbait inadvertently,” a staffer, whose name was redacted, wrote in one of the internal documents. wapo.st/3GniSCx
The company’s data scientists confirmed that posts that sparked angry reaction emoji were disproportionately likely to include misinformation, toxicity, and low-quality news.
For three years, Facebook had given special significance to the angry emoji. wapo.st/3GniSCx