First you need to download the Reads referenced in the paper. PRJNA605983. This is an NCBI accession number for a BioProject that will lead you to many SRR#s related to the samples within the BioProject.
You will need 4 open source software tools that run in Linux/Ubuntu.
SRAtoolkit -Downloads reads from NCBI
samtools- general file I/O
Trim_galore- Trims reads of adaptors
bwa mem- Maps reads to a reference.
You will need lots of disk space.
Once you have SRAtoolkit installed, you can use fastq-dump.
kevinmc$ fastq-dump --accession SRR11092057
you will get 2 fastq files (16Gb each). You can us --gzip to download compressed and the next steps can work with zipped files.
Next step is to Trim the Illumina adapters off the sequence. Every Target DNA molecule has primer sequences adapted to them for PCR and Sequencing. Need to remove them before alignment to a ref.
This leaves you with some large files and a few report files itemizing how aggressively it trimmed the reads.
Final step is to map these reads against Nipah Virus.
You will need to download this genome accession number.
The Quay paper is good for this. They reproduced the original short preprint paper. I wanted to reproduce this with different tools to ensure it's legit.
AY988601.1
The Quay paper is good read. They went deeper on this problem and found more smoke.
What do we see?
If you want to visualize a BAM file you will need to index the file and use IGV to open it.
samtools index AY_WIV_x_Nipah.bam
Not only are reads found that map to many parts of the Nipah virus, the reads that map to the end of the virus have novel sequence.
The read mapping profile across the genome reproduces Quay et al.
Quay et al, noticed the reads that map to the ends of the virus had novel sequence on them that matched a cloning vector. This is evidence WIV is probably performing GOF on Nipah virus and that the patient may not have been infected by Nipah but that the lab is dirty.
Here is an example of reads that reach into the cloning vector at the end of the virus. The lower reads boxed in red are paired end reads where the reverse read doesn't land on the reference. A BLAST of these unanchored paired reads hits deep into the cloning vector. Makes sense.
Internal regions of the virus also have regions like this which is odd. Need to dig more here.
This is solid Evidence that WIV is gambling with even more deadly viruses. They need to explain this mess. The people that funded them to do this have a lot to answer for.
The take home message. WIV is handling BL4 viruses and cant seem to keep them from getting into BL2 sequencing projects. Its a mess.
Fauci is funding this work by laundering the money through a fall guy. DARPA rejected funding this work as it was too dangerous. Doesnt stop Fauci
He just finds a few loop holes through the regs he authored and sends it to a sweat shop in China that can't keep their chocolate from getting in their peanut butter.
It probably helps that his wife is on the Ethics committee.
I knew in 2020 we were in for it when many people in our field tried to cancel @KyleTurley for suggesting cannabinoids might help for coronaviruses.
What is better than a drug that not only slows the replication of the virus but also boosts the host?
In retrospect, the same people that called for medically censoring an elite athlete, would soon censor physicians, scientists, economists, musicians, artists and intellectuals
No one is qualified to enough to speak out and dissonants need to be banned from society @joerogan
Drugs we knew the most about were exchanged for experimental mRNA transfections using rare and immuno-ablating pseudouridines (as opposed to native uracil). The therapy is a toxic spike protein at very high copy numbers.
The placebo group was torpedoed
The liability waived.
This paper profiles SARs-CoV-2 derived exosomes but does NOT report any spike protein. If anyone has data that counters this or suggests I misread the supplement, I'm all ears. I was expecting both to have them but the vaccinated to have more due to dose frontiersin.org/articles/10.33…
We keep hearing from @drsanjaygupta that the vaxxed are less likely to get C19.
Not true for many age groups.
This was evident in the Pfizer trial data. There is negative VE 2 weeks after the shot.
I hope @drsanjaygupta reviews the references on myocarditis.
It’s 1:5000 from the Vax.
1:1M from the virus.
Asymptomatic spread is NOT 40% of cases. Iceland showed kids don’t transmit it.
You don’t have immunity from the Vax.
Antibodies levels are poor proxy for outcomes.
Myocarditis in kids.
You are pimping dangerous medicine that is being mandated. You are on the wrong side of history and show up to Joe Rogan better prepared with citations …not CNN talking points.
HiC from @PhaseGenomics on Psilocybe cubensis.
204 Million 150bp reads (30 billion bases) are generated to produce a Proximity ligation map of the cubensis genome. The Blue boxes are the 13 Chromosomes.Most of which have telomeres now.
13 Chromosomes from 4.675Mb to 2.3Mb in size.
The dense diagonal lines represent the likelihood of those regions of the genome being in close proximity to other regions.
Since chromosomes tend to be wound by chromatin, cross linking of the chromatin, followed by digestion
And ligation provides you with chimeric DNA that represents the 3D structure of the DNA as it’s wrapped around chromatin.
Pieces of DNA, 1 million bases apart but on the same chromosome, are more likely to be captured in this sequencing process.