Share this page!

Gurkirat Singh Gill Profile picture
Twitter logo
1 Nov, 4 tweets, 2 min read
By the way, for what's it worth, I didn't think that intent was an issue with Indian batters. The first 4 wickets fell to attempted boundary shots. KL's dismissal was the most unfortunate one. The only thing different IND could have done is send Pant at 4
and not have Kohli & Rohit bat together vs spin. Once Rohit was out at 40-3 at the 7.4 over mark, there was no way Pant could have attacked freely with an out of form Pandya to follow. KL's wicket was the turning point. India never really recovered from
there. And while it can be argued that why was Rohit demoted & Kishan not kept in the middle order to tackle spin, the think tank probably wanted to maximise the powerplay with both Kishan & KL since Rohit is a slow starter. Batting first you need some of these things to do your
way, but for India, nothing did. And the added pressure of a knock out game made them even more doubtful of their approach which is what Virat also pointed out in the post match presentation.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Gurkirat Singh Gill

Gurkirat Singh Gill Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @gurkiratsgill

Gurkirat Singh Gill Profile picture
2 Nov
Thread:

As a great man once said, sport isn't about revenge. It's about respect & pride. Star Sports have often forgotten this, which has led to some unforgotten second hand embarrassment for Indian cricket fans.
Here's a thread of those campaigns/promos
Image
1. 2012: #AaneDo for home series vs Pakistan. Ind lose ODI series 2-1
2. 2015: #WeWontGiveItBack. Dhoni had even said 'the cup doesn't belong to us. We took it from someone and someone else will take it from us.
3. 2015: Calling Bangladesh 'Bacha' (A kid) before the series.
Result: Bangladesh beat India for the first time in an ODI series.

4. 2019 Ind Aus series: Showed Aussie players to be pissing at the prospect of facing India. The most disgraceful promo ever I have seen. Result, Aus beat India 3-2 in ODIs and 2-0 in T20Is.
Read 7 tweets
Gurkirat Singh Gill Profile picture
1 Oct
If you look closely at all the tactical mistakes that PBKS have done in the last two seasons, you'll know that the root cause is that the think tank doesn't realise/accept that T20 is fickle format where you can do most things right but still lose due to freak things. (1/n)
+
First game last season, they lost to DC in a super over while playing a perfect team, but the result of that was that they dropped their best death bowler in Jordan for the next match and played Neesham at 7, who didn't add much to their bowling or batting. Not only that, (2/n)
it also meant Rahul was anchoring and Cottrell, who was a new ball bowler, was bowling at the death, which resulted in loss to RR at Sharjah. Next game, they drop another bowler to strengthen the batting and go in Maxwell, Neesham & Gowtham to bowl 8 overs against MI. A line up
Read 12 tweets
Gurkirat Singh Gill Profile picture
30 Sep
Contrary to what seems to be the popular belief that a 10 team IPL will increase the gap between Top 3-4 teams and others due to player quality, I believe it's the quality of think tanks that will make a bigger difference. You need to look at a PBKS or SRH and see for yourself.
+
Even DC, one of the successful teams in the last 2-3 seasons, haven't been great with their OS buys. Also, have a look at the players who are on the bench. SRK, Porel, Umesh, Ishant, Mishra, Gowtham, Jagadeeshan, M Ashwin, V Vinod, Sarfaraz, Markande etc can be good additions
+
Then look at OS players who franchises miss out on picking because of their Aussie bias. I believe that two new teams will help us in seeing more individual talent for sure, but if it translates to more competitive cricket or not, will depend totally on who the two new franchises
Read 4 tweets
Gurkirat Singh Gill Profile picture
6 Feb
So many things wrong in this tweet that I can't even...

1. It's NOT a turning track.
2. Sweep with conviction & be aggresive are two different statements which could easily be mutually exclusives.
3 Field was already spread.

Will explain the 2nd point in the thread below

+ Image
Cook played the sweep with conviction in 2012 but he wasn't overly aggressive while facing Indian spinners. Plus, sweep is a special shot which not every batsman can play. Pietersen was aggresive in Mumbai but he didn't play the sweep much because the pitch had extra bounce.
+
Pujara & Mayank are pretty aggresive when it comes to playing spin, but they rely on using their feet. Pujara does it to play along the ground, while Mayank goes aerial. Same for Rohit, out of these 3, only Mayank rarely plays the sweep. In fact, in the current top 6, only Pant
+
Read 6 tweets
Gurkirat Singh Gill Profile picture
17 Jan
Thread:

Single performances winning you tests are rare, and as a batsmen nearly impossible as a team need 20 wkts to win. So the argument that a player performs in 'wins' is not a good enough to judge someone's ability in any way. Those performances have turned out to be winning
contributions because others have stepped up. Wins only make those performances memorable. On the other hand, what carries more weight regarding an individual ability is the performance(s) that come in a loss, because they truly show where you stand apart from your peers in terms
of skills & character. Tendulkar & Kohli are often brought down by the logic, 'ohh they have performed in losses & are not match winners or are selfish'. Anyone saying this couldn't be more wrong since those performances showed everyone else why they were better than the rest.
Read 10 tweets
Gurkirat Singh Gill Profile picture
14 Jan
Think adjusting for OS spinners in Asia on their first tour is very similar to how Asian pacers adjust outside Asia. Mostly, the first tour is a struggle regardless of quality because they are not able to judge the right kind of line & length to bowl. Sharing the numbers for Lyon
Swann & Panesar to add some weight to what I want to say.

Swann avged 39.5 & took 8 wkts at a SR of 75.3 in his first tour to Ind (& Asia) (08-09). In 2012, he avged 24.75 & took 20 wkts at . Massive improvement which was also due to one tour each in BAN, UAE & SL.
Panesar took 5 wkts from 6 inns at an avg of 62.4 & SR of 141 in his first tour to IND (2006). In 2008/09, he avged 50.5 & took a wkt every 101 deliveries for his 6 wkts. Those numbers came down to 26.82 (avg) & 64.5 (SR) with him taking 17 wkts. Again, constant improvement.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get emails when @gurkiratsgill has new unrolls!

Check out other threads from @gurkiratsgill!

Read all threads by @gurkiratsgill

:(