You can easily observe that law enforcement is already on this trajectory.
-Violating human rights during arrests
-racial bias towards arrests and public interactions
-an increase in radicalization of officers
-surveillance of private citizens
-protecting property not people
@MgS_2011 is warning us. Alberta is moving into full blown fascism.
Law enforcement loyal to the government & imbued with police state authority is a classic fascist characteristic.
With a provincial police force loyal to UCP, human rights, freedom and liberty would be eradicated. If the police have the power to document history as they see it and imagine it, we’re royally screwed.
These powers could be used by the government to radically reform Alberta.
If police document covid is over and endemic, then it is accepted as truth. No medical opinions would matter because when the police write it down, it becomes fact.
With no access to the courts, human rights tribunals would be the only recourse to grieve this issue.
Now do you understand why the expansion of CHRT’s purview is being fought by the federal government?
Why this court case against AFN, Blackstock and CHRT is not about children at all. It’s about stemming the expansion of CHRT’s power grab.
The far right may be using Blackstock’s activism and rage over being surveilled illegally to aid in the CHRT’s power grab.
I say may, because the possibility remains that radical FN are aiding the far right in this endeavour. I don’t know one way or the other.
Is Cindy Blackstock being used as a “weapon” to unravel the judiciary as a branch of fed govt? It wouldn’t surprise me. Complicit or unwitting, this radical faction of FN is aligned with the far right’s ambition to neuter legitimate federal authority. That’s fact not conjecture.
I’m gobsmacked myself that I didn’t realize this. FFS!
In the effort to privatize (read control) justice and the courts, control of the quasi-judicial authorities is essential. That includes federal & provincial human rights orgs.
This has already occurred at the macro level.
Foreign Investment Protection Agreements (FIPAs) remove the Canadian judiciary from adjudicating conflicts.
International trade tribunals have replaced the Canadian courts in determining responsibility for loss of profits and compromised national sovereignty.
How? I’ll explain.
If a federal government creates policy that compromises the profits of a foreign investor in Canada (covered by a FIPA, like China), the investor can sue the GOC for loss of profit and removal of the legislation limiting their profits.
IN A SECRET TRIBUNAL.
The International Trade Tribunal has been created to keep proceedings secret (confidential) until a decision is made. And there is no recourse for an appeal. It’s a final decision.
Meaning, LPC has legislated carbon levies & if it impacts foreign investor profits, they can sue.
It’s all behind a shroud of confidentiality. The public won’t know it’s even happening until the final decision is made. Neither litigant can discuss the case publicly. Meaning Chinese foreign investors (among others) could be suing Canada for multiple issues & we wouldn’t know.
The public won’t know until the Tribunal, stacked with corporate investor adjudicators, decides whether carbon levies negatively impact foreign investor profits. The tribunal can order Canada to repay any lost profits and GOC could be forced to rescind the offending legislation.
Especially if several foreign investors are suing GOC on the same basis.
The tribunal is not required to recognize natural disasters, climate change, section 35 indigenous human rights or any other Canadian based legislation that protects national sovereignty or human rights.
This is the booby trap that Harper set for all future governments.
That’s on a macro level.
Kenney is attempting to implement this on the provincial level.
Many may not remember, but UCP gave themselves absolute power to legislate in April 2020.
They revoked that power in Spring 2021. But how many anti democratic laws were passed that citizens didn’t notice because of the pandemic?
This law @MgS_2011 is warning about is one of them.
I remember some discussion of the dangers of this law.
But I didn’t then connect the ramifications of this provincial legislation with an overall strategy. Right now it’s limited to drunk driving. Get caught driving drunk and your licence can be removed instantly and you have zero access to the courts to prove otherwise.
Meaning, if you get pulled over by the police & they record that you’ve been drinking and are over the legal limit, you have no access to the court to prove you were actually returning home from visiting the hospital and hadn’t touched a drop of alcohol. crystalgaze2.blogspot.com/2021/02/albert…
There is no appeal or access to the court. The police information is accepted as fact. Truth and facts have become irrelevant.
Piss off the “powers that be” and you can lose your independence in transportation. And be levied several fines to create additional stress.
You’d have to access a human rights tribunal or sue the government of Alberta and law enforcement for breach of your Charter rights. Costing you much financially. And it would take time to get through the federal courts or through Alberta or Canadian human rights tribunal.
In the mean time, you can’t drive.
This is the same with Bill 1 anti protest legislation blocking public infrastructure. The law is bogus and breaches Charter rights and freedoms.
But who has been brave enough to take on the Alberta government to prove that in court? A few.
UCP is removing our human rights and freedoms one by one. Using transfer of authority to police to determine guilt extra-judiciously. And now they are planning their own loyal police force.
F**k!
The UCP needs to be removed ASAP.
Now it makes sense. The judiciary is being rendered irrelevant.
Harper & Kenney complained often about the court’s decisions interfering with parliamentary/legislature purview.
I said Kenney wasn’t dumb and I advised that he doesn’t care if people like him. I also warned waiting until the next election wasn’t an option. There won’t be another free and fair election in Alberta until UCP is removed.
NDP aren’t the traditionally moderate socialists anymore. They’re left libertarian. Anarcho-syncalist.
What does that mean?
Glad you’re wondering. Their beliefs will be familiar and explain the similarities between NDP and CPC.
The first principle is anarchism. Removal of any central authority. Anarcho-syndicalists (AS) believe in power distributed among the people. Not in political representatives.
This belief includes a preference for direct democracy. Everyone’s voice is equally valid.
Equally valid includes issues which require knowledge, experience & expertise. For eg. covid measures; direct democracy advocates believe restrictions should be decided by everyone, not experts or govt. Because a physician’s opinion is no more valid than a mechanic or waiter.
Some people are clearly incapable of thinking about anyone but themselves.
It’s fascist to mandate safety? It’s appropriate to wish ill upon a child activist?
It’s an extreme example, but this is the far right mindset.
These types are just the loudest examples.
I often wonder if people who say this kind of stuff out loud have the capacity to understand the level of repugnance they generate in the rest of society. I don’t think they do. Honestly, who could be this disgusting and self aware?
It’s absurd how lacking in self awareness these people are. Imagine gaining joy from using swastikas to smear reputations or wishing a child dead because she’s an effective communicator.
This is pure egotistical hedonism. Depravity, turpitude, vulgarity.
There are times when PMJT is amazing. He certainly is in his element when answering questions in a crowd. Especially when people are asking honest questions and not loaded questions that act like land mines. I admire his skills to relate to others. It’s inspiring.
But I’m not sure if those who watched this caught the bombshell he announced during this Q&A session.
I imagine it will come to the forefront in a matter of days at COP26. But the writing is on the wall for the Canadian O&G industry.
PMJT announced that the ceiling of fossil fuel expansion has been reached. There will be no more expansion of the fossil fuel industry. From this point forward, O&G is in decline. Sunsetting the industry is now the goal and replacing it with green energy options.
If you know what the case is about, it’s clear why the government will not let this fade without a Supreme Court ruling.
The decision to expand the mandate of CHRT should be made by parliament, not by the courts.
It’s like PHAC grabbing more power by making a decision outside of their purview. You’d expect the federal government to seek a court decision to reverse that breach of protocol.
Schweitzer answered the question. He just did it like a coy politician. He says HE didn’t fire her. He points to Human Resources and identifies the Premier’s office as running HR.
It could be the premier, his chief of staff, or Director of Issues Management. Maybe a couple others, but that’s it.
A likely scenario was Dreeshen complaining to Kenney that his ex intimate partner was harassing him. Kenney said get rid of her and one of the others made it happen. But that’s a guess.
That’s the reason I write. Collect information and analyze it. My health doesn’t permit me to do much more. But the cognitive ability is still intact and functions just fine.
I support LPC because they are the ONLY political party that acknowledges ALL indigenous peoples.
I have NEVER suggested FN narratives be silenced. I’ve merely recommended they be open and honest. I won’t tell you how to feel or think. Because I don’t believe that’s an ethical action. But you regularly tell others what they should think, as do members of your faction.
I’ve never delegitimated the option to not reconcile. That isn’t what I want, but it remains a valid option. For this fascist FN faction, that’s what reconciliation is. Regardless of what other indigenous peoples want. Dissent from that belief means exclusion from the in group.