That Time Natives Gave @MLB Commissioner Rob Manfred An Award: A Thread
Last week MLB Commissioner Rob Manfred decided that racial justice for Natives is over by announcing he was cool with the @braves racist name, chop, and chant.
Rob Manfred knows he's the best ever at solving all of the Native baseball racism because he has one Native friend, the National Congress of American Indians @NCAI1944, who gave him an award for it in 2019.
For being so good at not doing racism that he made sure that no Natives had to see that horrible chief wahoo when they turned on the TV or opened a magazine.
Natives are lucky Rob Manfred is around to let us know that what we thought was a gross stereotype that harms children due to negative representation of Natives isn't that at all. Turns out it's only racist if it doesn't make money.
Rob Manfred led by example by never taking a clear stance on chief wahoo, letting his actions (retiring the logo for on field use but still making money off of it) speak because those are much louder than words. Rob Manfred is an ally.
This year Rob Manfred once again reminded us of his superbest Native allyship when he courageously stood up for correct Native representation and meekly suggested that Cleveland change their name in 2018.
Changing the name was definitely not a PR move made to protect the MLB brand due to a much needed and long overdue social justice reckoning but because Rob Manfred mentioned it in passing 4 years ago. I mean, that's why he wins awards.
So the @braves. There are two schools of thought on this. One is when you see the name "hey..." then hear the opening strains of the chop music "wow that's really not ok..." and then when you see the tomahawk chop "OMG WHAT IS GOING ON I THOUGHT ROB MANFRED SOLVED RACISM".
The second isn't so much a school of thought as it is a state of being, one that is so integral to who you are that you're not certain who you are unless you can be it: A @braves fan.
Let's see what history has taught us. Rob Manfred is cool with it and he's the best at all the baseball racisms and not doing them because that's what his award says probably. Check.
I mean, he said Natives in that region are "wholly supportive of the Braves program, including the chop" and nothing will change because
"way before this became an issue, Atlanta cultivated a relationship with the Native American community which was very helpful in terms of making decisions like the two that have been raised."
Yes, ok, the braves and the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians are bffs who paint each others nails when they have sleepovers and that's been going on, according to the braves, for almost two decades and mlb.com/braves/communi…
they, like Rob Manfred, are cool with all of it so issue resolved. Not racist. Rob Manfred is still the most correct of everyone ever when we talk about baseball racism. Gotcha.
Except...
Here's some Natives protesting in Atlanta. The braves are in Atlanta. According to the sign one of them is holding they want the braves to #stopthechop.
According to the caption they are protesting the use of the Native term for warrior (brave) as the team name. According to the title this happened in 1993.
According to math and how time works this picture of Natives not supporting the name, chop, and chant was 28 years ago which is longer than the almost two decades long friendship between the team and EBCI,
He fights tirelessly against doers of racism. He gave us the rules to know if something is baseball racist or not (is Rob Manfred cool with it and does it make money=keep on movin' no racism to see here).
He'd never pay lip service to racial justice by making a series of calculated moves designed to pacify Natives, like, say a gesture of a name change that in actuality is doing as little as possible to the point that it rings hollow.
Except...
Two weeks after he got his Supreme Not Having Any Racisms Near Him Ever Award in 2019 he said, “The Braves have taken steps to take out the tomahawk chop. I’d be remiss if I didn’t mention that.” So yes it's racist. mlb.nbcsports.com/2019/02/25/ado…
But then Sooper sekrit Rob Manfred sources said in maybe these exact words, "whoops Rob Manfred got his racisms confused. He meant to say no more chief noc a homa because that's definitely a racism but the chop is cool and definitely not a racism have you seen my award."
To be fair he'd only had it for two weeks so we should give Rob Manfred the benefit of the doubt when it comes to this racism mistake because we know Rob Manfred always has the best interests of Natives in mind and in his heart.
Except...
The @ncai1944, who gave him his Magnificent Decider Of Baseball Racisms Award, which conferred upon him that gilded "I did the right thing I'm a Native Ally" golden glow said that yes indeedy Rob Manfred got his racisms wrong again
and that yes the braves name, chop, and chant are 100% racist.
They said that they'd been telling Rob Manfred this since before he sold Natives out
by letting Cleveland continue to make money off racist chief wahoo as everyone yelled about the retirement of the gross mascot while whispering that it was only retired for on field use,
giving the appearance of having taken decisive and swift moral action against baseball racisms when in reality he'd done the exact opposite. Suddenly his award is a Not As Great Sounding Now That We Know Rob Manfred Didn't Actually Earn It award.
To sum up, Rob Manfred, The Most Perfect Person To Be Handling Baseball Racisms It Says So on His Award Sorta, mistook a racist mascot for a not a racist according to his own rules hand gesture made by fans of the braves,
a team who have had the support of the entire Native community in that region for longer than anyone's raised any concerns except for those two protesters and also a lot of others who specifically wanted the name changed and the chop stopped in 1993 which was 28 years ago,
before the braves and the EBCI had a playdate set up with each other by their parents almost 20 years ago.
I'm starting to think that "is Rob Manfred cool with it" and "does it make money" aren't the questions we should be asking to determine if something is racist in baseball. We should ask "Is Rob Manfred cool with it *because* it makes money?"
If the answer is yes (SPOILER ALERT: The answer will always be yes. See: continued sales of chief wahoo) then that's your answer for if it's just plain racist or not.
What people don't understand is that you can do and participate in things that are racist without being racist yourself. It's your understanding of what you are doing or participating in that makes the difference.
Lets talk about your Aunt Bea.
Aunt Bea loves baseball and is a huge ATL fan. She became a fan when they were the Boston Bees because it tickled her that they shared a name. Her fandom continued when they became the Boston @braves, then the Milwaukee braves, and now as Atlanta.
I was going to answer individually but, shockingly, Atlanta fans vocabulary is really limited so they just repeat each other. Here's my response.
Yes I: am fat, have blue bangs, could eat more salads
No I: am not a guy, white, going to fuck myself/die
Oh! And...
For those simply tweeting my profile pic I feel bad that you can't use your words so here's some more for you to choose from so I don't get bored. Again.
Thanks for the chance to look at some really great memories!
What I'd really like is to go back to not having to talk about this but I made a promise to my kid in 2014. She was told in a college class that racism against Natives didn't matter because of the Washington, Cleveland, Atlanta, and KC names and mascots.
I promised her that I'd do everything in my power to make sure she never had to hear anything like that again.
I failed.
Two months later a woman who was upset that she had to wait for something in a retail setting due to a technical issue called my kid a wetback beaner. My kid bowed up and informed her she was Native. The lady then called her a retarded redskin.
The other night the @Braves dimmed the lights so their fans could once again perform the disgusting tomahawk chop, lit by their phone flashlights and amplified by their faclke Native chant. This despite years of Natives opposing the chop as racist.
Speaking as a Mvskoke and Semvnole violently targeted by @Braves fans for vocally opposing the use of Native iconography by Atlanta I can tell you it doesn't matter what we say about it.
There's nothing vaguely negative about that comment. It was a targeted attack using disgusting stereotypes. You say that was sarcasm but in the next breath dismiss our concerns as something that doesn't actually matter. You can't have it both ways.
Yes. I described the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians using the word "pet" .
Since some Atlanta fans are using their cerebral cortices to remember the tomahawk chant instead of learning how actual words work I'll explain, not that they'll bother to admit they misunderstood.
English contains 8 parts of speech that have specific functions in a sentence: nouns, verbs, adjectives, adverbs, pronouns, prepositions, conjunctions, and articles.
For our purposes we'll focus on nouns and adjectives.
This is the sentence Atlanta fans are upset with. The contentious portion is "pet tribe", which people wrongly believe I used to compare EBCI with animals.
"Atlanta can buy a pet tribe in the Eastern Band of Cherokee but until this ends and they #changethename they are too."