There’s a VERY blurry livestream of the
Dallas gathering awaiting the return of JFK (Sr? Jr?).

Looks like a couple hundred people on the Grassy Knoll with another gathering right across the street. People are shouting gematria into the camera: “You’ll find out = 165.”
The streamer is yelling for people to “get out of the road.” They seemly have gotten excited by a red car driven by a person w/flamboyant hair, which stopped near them.

I am unironically glad she’s being a get-back coach for them. I’d like us to get through this w/no casualties.
I’ll update this if anything unexpected happens but in all likelihood it’ll be a pretty standard Great Disappointment: people will be crushed at first but will swiftly rationalize.
Incidentally, for people who are like “why does JFK Jr matter to these folks?”, Dappergander has you covered.

Click into the tweet if you want access to a GREAT explainer — it’s on Patreon but I believe it’s free.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with The Q Origins Project

The Q Origins Project Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @QOrigins

2 Nov
We have *definitely* reached the “bargaining” stage of JFK Watch 2021.

“They have to be safe,” explains a woman to a steadily dwindling audience in a QAnon live chat. “That’s why everything keeps changing.”

“Hold the line,” urge others.

A caller from Ireland says, “We won!”
Also: don’t be a dick in the replies. These people aren’t stupid; QAnon, like any other cult, meets their emotional needs in the short term & absolutely ruins their lives in the long term.

So: are they stupid? No. Dangerous to democracy? Yes. Victims? Kinda.

Life’s complicated.
The audience is dropping off little by little — roughly 400 people departed in about 15 minutes.

The current speaker is big into numerology, and is explaining how this is a “beautiful gift” but “people who don’t have an open heart and open mind… will never experience” it.
Read 50 tweets
2 Nov
I'm listening to a livestream of QAnon believers waiting in Dallas for JFK (Sr. *or* Jr.) to return. Could be tomorrow, could be as soon as 11 PM Central tonight!

"See, that's what I'm wanting to know: at what price have we won?" asks the host, WILDLY outkicking his coverage.
Anyway, the vibes are generally pretty positive. In particular, folks are pumped up about the revalue -- when the worthless Iraqi dinars they've bought will suddenly be worth $1 apiece & they'll be rich.
Stream ended. I found a YT channel with not-quite-live footage.

People at the event are claiming that OAN and Right Side Broadcasting are there for the big reveal tonight and "everyone" will be there tomorrow.

I'd be shocked if either outlet knows this is happening.
Read 6 tweets
31 Oct
There *is* no equivalent among Democrats, but we need to build one in a hurry if America is gonna survive.

First, because it’s true; that’s how bad the situation has gotten. Second, bc unilateral disarmament’s killing us — we need radical action but the base doesn’t want it yet.
And by “radical action” I mean things like:

*split up California into a zillion small, reliably blue states to control the Senate for decades to come;

*expand SCOTUS before the conservative majority destroys our chance to deal with climate change;
* pass laws making it illegal for candidates and officeholders to claim an election was stolen or *will* be stolen, unless they can prove it in court, w/real penalties attached (this is the most narrowly targeted way to prevent a J6 redux, & the Constitution’s not a suicide pact)
Read 7 tweets
28 Oct
I’m worried I’m leaving a BUNCH of people out, but:

@2021_Karma, @QuacksAnonymous, @ResearchFQX, @kunstderfuge1, @AlxnderThaGr8, @nickbackovic himself, @TheOndrakGuy.

Also, shout out to @conspirator0 and @ZellaQuixote, who were THE first two analysts to notice & explain QAnon.
OK, more people:

@get_innocuous for Stop the Steal fuckery in general and its intersection w/QAnon in particular

@GThonks for having had only one (1) bad take and about 1,000,000 good takes on QAnon, which is MUCH better than me

(Also, if you think I’m leaving you out, DM me!)
NON-QANON LIGHTNING ROUND:

@bellingcat for inspiring me to get into OSINT work at all and, inexplicably, publishing me three times (!!!) — special thanks: @AricToler

@NataliaAntonova for teaching me to be sweatily paranoid about how easy it is to stalk people online (TOO EASY)
Read 14 tweets
27 Oct
Everyone agrees it's *very* dangerous -- and *very* bad for democracy -- to have GOP electeds screaming "fraud!" every time they lose an election, then trying to install Stop the Steal types to *run* the next round of elections.

But how can we impose *consequences*? My take: 1/9
* Pass laws -- at the federal and state levels -- making it a crime for an officeholder or political candidate to say that an upcoming or just-completed election was fraudulent, *unless* a court finds it really was fraudulent. Trials would be super-expedited; penalties, 5-10 yrs.
This, of course, would run into 1st Amendment issues right away. But the Constitution is not a suicide pact, and the threat is grave.

Also: y'know how gov't employees don't have unrestricted free speech in all circumstances (& can't perform certain political activities AT ALL)?
Read 10 tweets
25 Oct
I generally stay out of The Discourse™, but a bunch of antifascist accounts have been big mad at my friend Amanda today, on the grounds that she was infiltrating fascist movements *in the wrong way.*

I've read the critiques.

There is a 0% chance they'd say this about a man.
Zero

per

cent.

And what are the giveaways? The critiques are both vague *and* unsupported by facts. One account, e.g., claimed that REAL infiltrators coordinate with researchers -- which Amanda did; I can personally attest to that -- and local antifascists (she did that too!).
So... it's weird to make those claims, especially without trying to find out the truth! It's...

It's almost as if they're looking at a woman getting lots of publicity for doing the same kind of work *they* do, and going: "What? What? How DARE *she* be more visible than *me?*"
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(