REACT-1 results from today:
-highest SARS-CoV-2 prevalence since the study started in May 2020
-very high prevalence in primary & secondary school kids
-higher infection in households with children
-⬆️ in AY.4.2 to 11% end Oct
- 4x increase in SW - due to Immensa scandal
REACT-1 shows the overall prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 was higher than in any previous round of REACT-1 since May 2020. It estimates that ~1.2 million people were infected on any day towards the end of Oct. Swab positivity declines towards the end of Oct coinciding with half-term.
The study finds the highest prevalence of infection ~5.7% among primary and secondary school age children, with increased risk for those living with children. They say this is driving the rise of infection in the 65+ age group where prevalence has *doubled* between Sept and Oct.
There is a 4x increase in positivity in the South-West that is very likely linked to the Immensa scandal. This figure says everything:
It's clear 1. that schools are driving transmission substantially 2. This is driving up infections in more vulnerable groups ultimately translating to more hospitalisations and deaths
Much of this is down to the lack of mitigations & vaccination in children
We see declines in infection in children, but also reflected in other age groups around half-term. Shows a clear picture of impact of school holidays on transmission among children & in the community. Unfortunately these are likely to be short-lived as school re-open.
REACT-1 concludes that there is risk to vulnerable children & household contacts. It says that accelerated vaccination of children is likely to make a difference. So far children's vaccination has been very slow, and delaying offering this appears to have had huge -ve impact.
The harm done by multiple govt policies, and lack of oversight of contract provision is very clear in this study. Despite vaccines, it's shameful that we have the highest infection rates we've ever had.
A lot down of this is down to very high rates of infection in children (due to lack of mitigations & vaccination) spilling over into other age groups, which has also resulted in higher hospitalisation & death rates than this time last year (when we didn't have vaccines!)
The huge surge in the SW appears to be down to the Immensa scandal, which the govt is still denying had any impact. This almost certainly led to loss of life, as have our exceptional policies of almost no mitigations and huge delays in vaccination in schools.
Who is accountable? JCVI's minimisation of COVID-19 in children, with clear repeated narratives of infection being 'advantageous' for children and important for the UK COVID-19 pandemic has almost certainly been fatal for many.
There is so much govt could be doing to avoid >1,100 deaths per week and unsustainable pressure on the NHS- simple measures that don't disrupt people's lives, but ensure they can get healthcare, children can go into schools protected without disruption.
But will it?
Also worth adding about AY.4.2 - we don't know much about it but the consistent growth (even if not very fast) is worrying. The last PHE report showed a significantly higher. household secondary attack rate compared to delta (more likely to transmit to contacts).
At this point, anything outcompeting delta, and showing a higher proportion of contacts infected worries me, given how transmissible and able to escape delta is.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Lockdowns happen when governments delay public health measures until too late. Scientists have been arguing for masks, ventilation, vaccination, support for isolation which have little/no negative impacts. Why're we portrayed as 'pro-lockdown' when we're trying to prevent them?
Almost every single interview I've done in the last few days has involved the interviewer conflating public health measures like mask wearing, social distancing etc. with lockdowns, speaking about a 'balance' between mental health & economic impacts and health. Please do better.
There is no dichotomy here. Masks, ventilation, vaccination, are all essential to contain COVID-19, and therefore essential to protect health, economy, and freedoms - because if we don't put these measures in place, it is likely we'll need more severe restrictions.
Letter from our council today to parents.
'Schools are working hard to balance safety' with 'children receiving the education they deserve'...
Don't children deserve safety and education, especially when making their environment safer is what ensures they can stay in school?🧵
The next bit tells contacts they don't need to isolate, but are advised to get a single PCR test. The first bit of advice is to 'wash your hands for 20 secs'.
Kids are expected to 'wear a face covering.. where they encounter lots of people in an encloses space'.. except schools!
I couldn't bring myself to read the rest. Our children are being let down badly- by govt, by JCVI, by RCPCH, former PHE (now UKHSA), and local authorities. I feel completely hopeless for our children- who are getting infected in droves, while other countries protect theirs.
Ok, so let's be clear on what people have been saying which is is that *current death rates* in the UK are >2x higher than *Western Europe*. This is entirely true. This tweet uses *cumulative deaths* which is misleading & conflates Europe with W. Europe.
There is *no doubt* that early lockdowns would've saved lives. A small first wave does not mean a large exit wave, as many SE Asian countries & Israel showed pre-delta. Those that did have large 2nd waves had these because of alpha spread from England!
Concerned at the lack of understanding of basic public health principles. Let me correct this.
"We are asking asymptomatic children to test, so we can detect infection before it spreads to others, so we can keep children & families safe & not fuel transmission in schools"
Most transmission happens at the pre-symptomatic stage, and many children are asymptomatic. They have the same virus levels and replicable virus as those who are symptomatic, and can transmit. It's mass superspreading in schools that causes absenteeism, not protective measures.
Having mass transmission in schools is far from harmless. Why aren't you advocating for urgent mitigations + vaccination of children, rather than pushing for misinformed policies that are likely to expose even more children to the impact of COVID-19
Interesting paper out in JID examining viral load, and viral replication in <=21 yr old children with COVID-19 in the US. TL;DR
-viral loads & virus replicability do not vary by age
-highest viral load 0-2 days after symptoms
-asymptomatic children are likely infectious too!
🧵
We often hear that children are possibly less susceptible to infection than adults, and that older children are more susceptible than younger children. Much of the evidence around this is based on flawed studies that relied on symptom-based testing.
Younger children are more likely to be asymptomatic and missed on routine testing, which is reliant on children developing symptoms, and being tested. This study compares virus loads across age groups - and among asymptomatic and symptomatic children, and mild and severe illness.
The 43K false negative test error is not minor. If you consider an R=1 & even 1 generation of infection (likely more, considering the 35 day period over which errors occurred), it's likely that >43,000 more people got infected which means a significant no of avoidable deaths.🧵
It's not enough to say 'people will be notified but site names won't be released'. This is a huge issue- there needs to be transparency with the public & we need to know numbers underestimated in different regions so we can correct regional trends.
We also need urgent transparency on where the 43,000 figure comes from. How do we know the extent of the problem, and how sure are we that this doesn't extend back further, or more samples were not affected? There needs to be an urgent independent enquiry.