Apparently saying that you don't have to have the Qur'an memorised cover to cover in order to be a solid Talib 'ilm is "destroying the aspirations of students and causing confusion to the beginning student in his methodology of pursuing knowledge".
I'd say some of the statements in that thread are what destroys the aspirations of new students.
Imagine X who just got off the roads at 25 and wants to seek knowledge and he's told you cannot become a Talib 'Ilm or do anything until you've memorised the Quran cover to cover.
The beginning student is of varying levels. A 7 year old beginner is not the same as a 26 year old beginner. A person who grew up surrounded by ilm is not like one who grew up surrounded by sin and misguidance and who has only just come to the truth
Painting them all with the same brush of "You can't do anything until you've memorised the Qur'an cover to cover" is unwise and impractical.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
‘We should ignore the issues of Khilaf amongst those who claim to be part of the Ummah and unite to focus on the external enemy’?
قال الفريابي:
حدثنا هشام بن خالد الأزرق، حدثنا أبو مسهر، حدثني عون بن حكيم، حدثني الوليد بن سليمان بن أبي السائب أن رجاء بن حيوة كتب إلى هشام بن عبد الملك:
بلغني يا أمير المؤمنين أنه وقع في نفسك شيء بأمر قتل غيلان, وصالح، فوالله لقتلهما أفضل من قتل ألفين من الروم والترك
Rajaa’ b. Haywah sent a letter to the Caliph Hisham b. Abdul Malik after it reached him that the caliph had doubts regarding the command to kill Ghaylan and Salih.
Rajaa’ said:
“By Allah the killing of Ghaylan and Salih is superior to killing 2000 Romans and Turks”
“If a woman prays her 5, fasts her month, protects her private area & obeys her husband it will be said to her “Enter into Paradise from any of its doors””
إذا صلت المرأة خمسها وصامت شهرها وحفظت فرجها وأطاعت زوجها قيل لها ادخلي الجنة من أي أبواب الجنة شئت
After a brief look into this Hadith, it seems that it’s inauthentic.
Shadd Al Rihaal: Did Ibn Taymiyyah break the Ijmaa’?
A common claim made against him is that he broke the consensus that Shadd Al Rihaal is permissible to other than the 3 mosques.
Is this accurate?
No it’s not. In fact it’s not even an Ijma’ amongst Ash’aris before we even consider the other schools of thought attributed to Islam.
Al Nawawi says in his commentary on Sahih Muslim:
واختلف العلماء في شد الرحال وإعمال المطي إلى غير المساجد الثلاثة كالذهاب إلى قبور الصالحين وإلى المواضع الفاضلة ونحو ذلك فقال الشيخ أبو محمد الجويني من أصحابنا هو حرام وهو الذي أشار القاضي عياض إلى اختياره